Legislature(2011 - 2012)BUTROVICH 205
02/02/2012 09:00 AM Senate STATE AFFAIRS
| Audio | Topic |
|---|---|
| Start | |
| SB130 | |
| SJR10 | |
| SCR17 | |
| SB131 | |
| Adjourn |
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
| *+ | SCR 17 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| = | SB 130 | ||
| = | SJR 10 | ||
| = | SB 131 | ||
SB 131-DIVEST INVESTMENTS IN IRAN
9:18:54 AM
SENATOR WIELECHOWSKI announced that SB 131 was again before the
committee. Since the committee heard the bill, the governor made
a surprise announcement that he is asking the Alaska Permanent
Fund Corporation (APFC), Alaska Retirement Management (ARM)
Board, and Department of Revenue (DOR) to divest their holdings
from any companies doing business in Iran. He said he applauds
the governor's support for divesting, but it is not clear
whether he and the agencies he asked to divest currently have
sufficient legal authority to do so. He wished to learn more
about that question and about the fiscal notes the bill received
from the APFC. One of the fiscal notes, for $200,000 in FY 13,
refers to APFC custody and management fees.
9:19:01 AM
LAURA ACHEE, Director of Administration and Communications,
Alaska Permanent Fund Corporation (APFC), Department of Revenue
(DOR), Juneau, Alaska, introduced herself. She offered to answer
questions about SB 131.
SENATOR PASKVAN questioned the transactional cost related to the
bill.
MS. ACHEE explained that two elements relate to the costs; one
is the direct pass through cost that APFC is charged for brokers
buying and selling stocks, and the other is the cost of having
both internal and external staff manage the portfolio. At the
front end is the initial cost of divesting the stocks, and then
there are on-going costs of making sure those stocks are not re-
bought.
SENATOR PASKVAN said he thought those transactional costs were
part of every day, usual costs.
9:22:59 AM
MS. ACHEE countered the idea that APFC would not be doing
anything different. One of the tasks that would be different is
the monitoring of unacceptable stocks on the list to make sure
that they are not purchased. Also, the issue of paying the
brokers is a fixed cost. The management cost is not included in
the fiscal note. She addressed the issue of profits versus
losses, which cannot be estimated. Managers are expecting that
there might be some offers, but those costs are also not
included in the fiscal note.
SENATOR PASKVAN said he thought the investments should be
divested no matter what the cost.
SENATOR KOOKESH wondered if the fiscal note changed due to the
governor's interest.
MS. ACHEE answered said no.
SENATOR KOOKESH asked if the costs will be shared with the
governor.
MS. ACHEE said she has not discussed that situation.
SENATOR KOOKESH wondered how fiscal notes are determined now
that the governor has weighed in.
9:26:43 AM
SENATOR WIELECHOWSKI said that Senator Kookesh made a good
point. He wondered where the $200,000 would come from if the
bill does not pass, now that the governor has stated support.
MS. ACHEE said that discussion would have to happen and the
money would have to be found. She thought the direction of
inquiry was premature.
SENATOR GIESSEL asked if there were other stocks APFC is
prohibited from investing in.
MS. ACHEE said there were none.
SENATOR MEYER pointed out that there are some restrictions. For
example, high risk trading is not done.
MS. ACHEE did not know. A number of years ago the investment
authority was turned over to the APFC.
SENATOR WIELECHOWSKI said he had been told that the Permanent
Fund was divested from Sudanese investments.
MS. ACHEE said that was incorrect.
SENATOR WIELECHOWSKI said he understood that former-Governor
Palin requested that.
MS. ACHEE did not recall that. She assured the committee that
there has never been any divestment for any reason.
9:30:03 AM
DAN WAYNE, Legislative Legal Counsel, Legislative Affairs
Agency, introduced himself.
SENATOR WIELECHOWSKI related his conversation with Legislative
Legal questioning the governor's authority to request or demand
that the Permanent Fund divest from investments.
MR. WAYNE explained that the constitution gives the governor
power under Article 3, Section 16, to force compliance with any
constitutional or legislative mandate, which may make the
governor think he can take action to divest funds from the
Permanent Fund. Mr. Wayne did not think the Permanent Fund
Corporation could act on the request because the constitution
says in Article 9, Section 15, that "the principle of the
Permanent Fund shall be used only for those income producing
investments specifically designated by law as eligible for
Permanent Fund investment."
The legislature has designated by law how that money is supposed
to be invested in AS 37.13.120(a) "when adopting regulations
authorized by this section, or managing and investing fund
assets, the prudent investor rule shall be applied by the
corporation. The prudent investor rule is applied to investment
activity of the fund, means that the corporation shall exercise
the judgment and care under the circumstances then prevailing,
that an institutional investor of ordinary prudence, discretion,
and intelligence exercises in the designation management of
large investments entrusted to it, not in regard to speculation,
but in regard to the permanent disposition of funds, considering
preservation of the purchasing power of the fund over time while
maximizing the expected total return from both income and
appreciation of capital."
He concluded that the legislature has said this is the law to
follow when investing money. SB 131 adds a subsection to AS 37.
13.120 on page 5, Section 3, "the board shall comply with AS
37.10.072," which is the new section that requires divestment.
He opined that without legislative direction, the APFC can't
divest from Iran investments unless it would satisfy the
requirements of the prudent investment rule.
SENATOR WIELECHOWSKI asked Ms. Achee for clarification on the
fiscal note. He wondered how many fund managers were contacted
regarding the need for a fiscal note.
MS. ACHEE replied there were about 20-25 fund managers.
SENATOR WIELECHOWSKI inquired how many thought there would be a
cost.
MS. ACHEE said three fund managers decided SB 131 would require
a cost. One manager gave an estimate for manager fees, but they
were not included in fiscal note, as well as transaction costs.
She emphasized that the amount of $200,000 is not a definite
number, but a rough estimate.
SENATOR WIELECHOWSKI concluded that the fiscal note was based on
the recommendation of one fund manager. He summarized page 2,
lines 5-11, "if an investment in the fund is managed as a
commingled investment or other business structure in which the
fund is not the sole owner, the law does not apply." He asked if
it was a commingled investment.
9:38:06 AM
MS. ACHEE responded that it was not a commingled fund. All
managers that did not suggest that there would be a cost are
separate account active managers that do not fall under either
exclusion in the bill.
SENATOR WIELECHOWSKI understood that the one fund manager
manages about $1.3 billion.
MS. ACHEE clarified that the manager manages $1.4 billion, $1
billion of which is international large capitalized company
stock.
SENATOR WIELECHOWSKI stated that the state pays that manager
about $350,000 per quarter.
MS. ACHEE said manager fees vary. She did not know the number.
SENATOR WIELECHOWSKI asked if Ms. Achee or her lawyers had
looked at subsection (b).
MS. ACHEE said she has and it does not apply.
SENATOR WIELECHOWSKI thought it was a commingled investment.
9:40:46 AM
MS. ACHEE reviewed definitions: an active separate account is an
account where the manager makes decisions based on what is best
for the individual portfolio; passive managers align the
portfolio directly to an index and charge a significantly
smaller fee; commingled funds are blended with other
institutional investors like a mutual fund.
SENATOR PASKVAN requested a definition of basis points. He said
he estimated the transactional costs to be 25 basis points. He
wondered if they could be negotiated lower.
9:42:51 AM
MS. ACHEE defined a basis point as a fraction of a percent. For
example, $200,000 is two basis points of a $1 billion portfolio.
SENATOR PASKVAN asked if the value is 99.8 percent after two
basis points are removed.
MS. ACHEE said that APFC does not approach it that way. She
asked for further clarification of Senator Paskvan's question.
SENATOR PASKVAN assumed a $100,000 investment with a 2 basis
point transactional cost. He asked what amount remained.
MS. ACHEE said it would be the remainder if the stock were to be
sold for full value.
SENATOR PASKVAN restated the question based on a $100
investment. He asked if $99.80 would remain.
MS. ACHEE agreed.
SENATOR PASKVAN explained the rational for his analysis.
9:45:03 AM
SENATOR WIELECHOWSKI asked if there is a section in the contract
with the fund manager that discusses how much it would cost for
a legislative change.
MS. ACHEE did not know.
SENATOR WIELECHOWSKI wondered if the governor could legally
direct investments.
MS. ACHEE deferred to Legislative Legal to answer.
SENATOR KOOKESH asked Ms. Achee to follow up on that question.
MS. ACHEE did not feel comfortable answering the question.
SENATOR PASKVAN also wanted feedback on the question.
SENATOR KOOKESH said it was new ground and he wished to follow
the process.
SENATOR WIELECHOWSKI thanked Ms. Achee for her work. He left the
decision on the bill to the committee.
9:48:01 AM
SENATOR PASKVAN asked when the APFC might respond.
SENATOR WIELECHOWSKI requested more information about the
governor's letter. He related that Mr. Wayne maintained that the
governor's letter did not give the APFC authority to divest. He
also wondered if the governor could give authority for APFC to
divest.
MS. ACHEE said she would try to get an answer as soon as
possible, but it was up to the Department of Law to respond.
SENATOR WIELECHOWSKI said the committee would hold the bill
until further notice.
SENATOR MEYER recalled that the previous governor verbally
requested divestment from Sudan. He also wanted to find out the
governor's legal role. He agreed with the bill's intent from a
policy standpoint. He suggested moving the bill.
SENATOR KOOKESH also agreed to move the bill.
9:50:22 AM
SENATOR PASKVAN moved to report SB 131, version M, from
committee with individual recommendations and the attached
fiscal notes.
SENATOR WIELECHOWSKI added that there are two attached fiscal
notes; one from the Department of Revenue - Treasury, and one
from the Department of Revenue - APFC Operations. A revised
fiscal note concerning APFC custody and management fees may be
forthcoming.
SENATOR GIESSEL said in spite of the governor's support, she was
unsure of the bill. She stated objections to political aspects
of the bill, even though she did not dispute Iran's action. She
noted that Norway makes objective decisions about investments.
SENATOR WIELECHOWSKI agreed that that's the argument against the
bill. He said each individual case should be looked at based on
its own merits. He said Norway has a board that does allow
social investing. For example, Norway does not invest in tobacco
companies. He thought this bill was a unique situation. He
argued in favor of the bill.
9:53:36 AM
SENATOR GIESSEL commented on an investment Norway declined to
make.
SENATOR WIELECHOWSKI announced that without objection, SB 131
moved from the Senate State Affairs Standing Committee.
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|---|---|
| Iranian Divestment Fact Sheet.pdf |
HMSC 11/3/2011 12:15:00 PM SMSC 11/3/2011 12:15:00 PM SSTA 2/2/2012 9:00:00 AM |
SB 131 |
| Leg Research Report 10-24-11.pdf |
HMSC 11/3/2011 12:15:00 PM SMSC 11/3/2011 12:15:00 PM SSTA 2/2/2012 9:00:00 AM |
SB 131 |
| Minnesota scrutinized list.pdf |
HMSC 11/3/2011 12:15:00 PM SMSC 11/3/2011 12:15:00 PM SSTA 2/2/2012 9:00:00 AM |
SB 131 |
| StateIranDivestmentLegislationComparison2011.pdf |
HMSC 11/3/2011 12:15:00 PM SMSC 11/3/2011 12:15:00 PM SSTA 2/2/2012 9:00:00 AM |
SB 131 |
| SB 130 Sponsor Statement.pdf |
SSTA 2/2/2012 9:00:00 AM |
SB 130 |
| SB 130 Alaska Native Language & Advisory Council Ver.X.pdf |
SSTA 2/2/2012 9:00:00 AM |
SB 130 |
| SB 130 - AK Native Language Preservation Council bill Ver.B.pdf |
SSTA 2/2/2012 9:00:00 AM |
SB 130 |
| SB130-OOG Fiscal Note.pdf |
SSTA 2/2/2012 9:00:00 AM |
SB 130 |
| SB 131 Tim Geithner letter.pdf |
SSTA 2/2/2012 9:00:00 AM |
SB 131 |
| SB 131 WP Article, 12-1-11.pdf |
SSTA 2/2/2012 9:00:00 AM |
SB 131 |
| SB 131, version M.pdf |
SSTA 2/2/2012 9:00:00 AM |
SB 131 |
| SB 131 WSJ Article, 6-14-07.pdf |
SSTA 2/2/2012 9:00:00 AM |
SB 131 |
| SB131-REV-APFCO-01-27-12.pdf |
SSTA 2/2/2012 9:00:00 AM |
SB 131 |
| SB 131 AP Article, 1-23-12.pdf |
SSTA 2/2/2012 9:00:00 AM |
SB 131 |
| SB 131 Fact Sheet.pdf |
SSTA 2/2/2012 9:00:00 AM |
SB 131 |
| SB 131 National Post Article, 1-28-12.pdf |
SSTA 2/2/2012 9:00:00 AM |
SB 131 |
| SB 131 New York Iranian Divestment Legislation.pdf |
SSTA 2/2/2012 9:00:00 AM |
SB 131 |
| SB 131 Sectional Analysis.pdf |
SSTA 2/2/2012 9:00:00 AM |
SB 131 |
| SB 131 Sponsor Statement.pdf |
SSTA 2/2/2012 9:00:00 AM |
SB 131 |
| SB130Letters of Support up-1-30.PDF |
SSTA 2/2/2012 9:00:00 AM |
SB 130 |
| SB130back up research.PDF |
SSTA 2/2/2012 9:00:00 AM |
SB 130 |
| SB131-DOR-TRS-1-27-12.pdf |
SSTA 2/2/2012 9:00:00 AM |
SB 131 |
| SB130 letter of support.PDF |
SSTA 2/2/2012 9:00:00 AM |
SB 130 |
| SB 131 S STA PowerPoint Presentation.pdf |
SSTA 1/31/2012 9:00:00 AM SSTA 2/2/2012 9:00:00 AM |
SB 131 |
| SJR 10 Fiscal Note.pdf |
SSTA 2/2/2012 9:00:00 AM |
SJR 10 |
| SJR 10 Explanation of Changes from Version I to Version D.pdf |
SSTA 2/2/2012 9:00:00 AM |
SJR 10 |
| SJR 10, S STA CS, version D.pdf |
SSTA 2/2/2012 9:00:00 AM |
SJR 10 |
| SJR 10 Fact Sheet.pdf |
SSTA 2/2/2012 9:00:00 AM |
SJR 10 |
| SJR 10 Sectional Analysis.pdf |
SSTA 2/2/2012 9:00:00 AM |
SJR 10 |
| SJR 10 Sponsor Statement.pdf |
SSTA 2/2/2012 9:00:00 AM |
SJR 10 |
| SJR 10, version I.pdf |
SSTA 2/2/2012 9:00:00 AM |
SJR 10 |
| SJR 10 ADN Article.pdf |
SSTA 2/2/2012 9:00:00 AM |
SJR 10 |
| SJR 10 ADN Editorial.pdf |
SSTA 2/2/2012 9:00:00 AM |
SJR 10 |
| SJR 10 CBR History.pdf |
SSTA 2/2/2012 9:00:00 AM |
SJR 10 |
| SJR 10 FY13 Savings Account Balances.pdf |
SSTA 2/2/2012 9:00:00 AM |
SJR 10 |
| SJR 10 Goldsmith High Oil Prices Article.pdf |
SSTA 2/2/2012 9:00:00 AM |
SJR 10 |
| SJR 10 Goldsmith Petroleum Wealth Article.pdf |
SSTA 2/2/2012 9:00:00 AM |
SJR 10 |
| SJR 10 Goldsmith Saving Article.pdf |
SSTA 2/2/2012 9:00:00 AM |
SJR 10 |
| SJR 10 Juneau Empire Article.pdf |
SSTA 2/2/2012 9:00:00 AM |
SJR 10 |
| SJR10 Scott Goldsmith testimony.docx |
SSTA 2/2/2012 9:00:00 AM |
SJR 10 |
| SJR 10 Senate State Affairs Presentation 1-24-12.pdf |
SSTA 2/2/2012 9:00:00 AM |
SJR 10 |
| SCR 17 Original.pdf |
SSTA 2/2/2012 9:00:00 AM |
SCR 17 |
| CS for SCR 17 Version M.pdf |
SSTA 2/2/2012 9:00:00 AM |
SCR 17 |
| SCR 17 Background Information.pdf |
SSTA 2/2/2012 9:00:00 AM |
SCR 17 |
| SCR 17 List of Witnesses for Testimony.docx |
SSTA 2/2/2012 9:00:00 AM |
SCR 17 |
| SCR 17 Research and Statistics.pdf |
SSTA 2/2/2012 9:00:00 AM |
SCR 17 |
| SCR 17 Sponsor Statement.doc |
SSTA 2/2/2012 9:00:00 AM |
SCR 17 |
| SCR 17 100th Anniversary Information.pdf |
SSTA 2/2/2012 9:00:00 AM |
SCR 17 |
| SCR 17 Congressional and Other Resolutions.pdf |
SSTA 2/2/2012 9:00:00 AM |
SCR 17 |
| SCR 17 Research and Statistics 2.pdf |
SSTA 2/2/2012 9:00:00 AM |
SCR 17 |