Legislature(2005 - 2006)
05/10/2005 04:23 PM Joint 130
| Audio | Topic |
|---|---|
| Start | |
| SB130 | |
| Adjourn |
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
SB 130-WORKERS' COMPENSATION/ INSURANCE
CHAIR BEN STEVENS called the Conference Committee meeting on SB
130 to order at 4:23:00 PM. [CSSB 130(FIN) AM and HCS CSSB
130(JUD) AM H were under consideration] Present were
Representative Harris, Representative Coghill, Representative
Guttenberg, Senator Guess, Senator Seekins, and Chair Ben
Stevens.
SENATOR RALPH SEEKINS moved the committee accept the Senate
version of SB 130.
REPRESENTATIVE JOHN HARRIS objected.
CHAIR BEN STEVENS called for a roll call vote.
The motion failed with Senator Seekins and Senator Ben Stevens
voting yea and Senator Guess, Representative Guttenberg,
Representative Coghill and Representative Harris voting nay.
SENATOR SEEKINS moved the committee accept the House version of
SB 130.
SENATOR GRETCHEN GUESS objected.
CHAIR BEN STEVENS called for a roll call vote.
The motion failed with Representative Guttenberg and
Representative Harris voting yea and Representative Coghill,
Senator Guess, Senator Seekins and Senator Ben Stevens voting
nay.
4:25:16 PM
SENATOR SEEKINS moved to accept the House version of Items 1, 2,
and 3.
SENATOR GUESS objected to Item 2.
The committee adopted the House version of Items 1 and 3. Item 2
remained open.
SENATOR SEEKINS moved the committee accept the Senate version of
Items 4 and 5.
REPRESENTATIVE HARRIS objected.
Items 4 and 5 remained open.
4:26:34 PM
SENATOR SEEKINS moved to accept the House version of Item 6.
Hearing no objection, House version of Item 6 was adopted.
SENATOR SEEKINS moved to accept the Senate versions of Items 7,
8, and 9.
There was objection; Items 7, 8, and 9 remained open.
4:26:52 PM
SENATOR SEEKINS moved the committee accept the House version of
Items 10 and 11.
Hearing no objection, the House version of Items 10 and 11 were
adopted.
4:27:47 PM
SENATOR SEEKINS moved the committee accept the House version of
Items 12 and 13.
Hearing no objection, the House version of Items 12 and 13 were
adopted.
SENATOR SEEKINS moved the committee accept the Senate version on
Item 14.
SENATOR GUESS objected.
Item 14 remained open.
SENATOR SEEKINS moved the committee accept the House version of
Items 15 and 16.
CHAIR BEN STEVENS objected.
Items 15 and 16 remained open.
SENATOR SEEKINS moved the committee accept the Senate version of
Item 17.
Hearing no objection, the Senate version of Item 17 was adopted.
SENATOR SEEKINS moved the committee accept the House version of
Items 18, 19, 20, 21, and 22. Hearing no objection, the House
version of Items 18, 19, 20, 21, and 22 were adopted.
SENATOR SEEKINS moved the committee accept the Senate version of
Items 23, 24, and 25.
REPRESENTATIVE HARRIS objected to Item 25.
The committee adopted the Senate version of Items 23 and 24.
Item 25 remained open.
SENATOR SEEKINS moved the committee accept the House version of
Item 26.
CHAIR BEN STEVENS objected.
Item 26 remained open.
4:28:26 PM
SENATOR SEEKINS moved the committee accept the Senate version of
Item 27.
REPRESENTATIVE DAVID GUTTENBERG objected.
Item 27 remained open.
SENATOR SEEKINS moved the committee accept the House version of
Item 28.
Hearing no objection, the House version of Item 28 was adopted.
SENATOR SEEKINS moved the committee accept the Senate version of
Item 29.
REPRESENTATIVE HARRIS objected.
Item 29 remained open.
4:29:02 PM
SENATOR SEEKINS moved the committee accept the House version of
Item 30.
Hearing no objection, the House version of Item 30 was adopted.
SENATOR SEEKINS moved the committee accept the House version of
Item 31.
CHAIR BEN STEVENS objected.
Item 31 remained open.
SENATOR SEEKINS moved the committee accept the Senate version of
Item 32.
REPRESENTATIVE HARRIS objected.
Item 32 remained open.
4:29:43 PM
SENATOR SEEKINS moved the committee accept the House version of
Item 33.
Hearing no objection, the House version of Item 33 was adopted.
SENATOR SEEKINS moved the committee accept the Senate version of
Item 34 and 35.
REPRESENTATIVE HARRIS objected.
Items 34 and 35 remained open.
4:29:59 PM
SENATOR SEEKINS moved the committee accept the House version of
Item 36.
Hearing no objection, the House version of Item 36 was adopted.
SENATOR SEEKINS moved the committee accept the House version of
Item 37.
Hearing no objection, the House version of Item 37 was adopted.
SENATOR SEEKINS moved the committee accept the House version of
Item 38.
Hearing no objection, the House version of Item 38 was adopted.
4:30:36 PM
SENATOR SEEKINS moved the committee accept the House version of
Item 39.
Hearing no objection, the House version of Item 39 was adopted.
SENATOR SEEKINS moved the committee accept the House version of
Item 40.
CHAIR BEN STEVENS objected.
Item 40 remained open.
SENATOR SEEKINS moved the committee accept the House version of
Item 41.
CHAIR BEN STEVENS objected.
Item 41 remained open.
SENATOR SEEKINS moved the committee accept the House version of
Item 42.
Hearing no objection, the House version of Item 42 was adopted.
4:31:02 PM
SENATOR SEEKINS moved the committee accept the House version of
Item 43.
CHAIR BEN STEVENS objected.
Item 43 remained open.
SENATOR SEEKINS moved the committee accept the House version of
Item 44.
Hearing no objection, the House version of Item 44 was adopted.
SENATOR SEEKINS moved the committee accept the House version of
Item 45.
Hearing no objection, the House version of Item 45 was adopted.
4:31:30 PM
SENATOR SEEKINS moved the committee accept the House version of
Item 46.
Hearing no objection, the House version of Item 46 was adopted.
SENATOR SEEKINS moved the committee accept the House version of
Item 47.
SENATOR GUESS objected.
Item 47 remained open.
SENATOR SEEKINS moved the committee accept the House version of
Item 48.
Hearing no objection, the House version of Item 48 was adopted.
SENATOR SEEKINS moved the committee accept the Senate version of
Item 49.
REPRESENTATIVE HARRIS objected.
Item 49 remained open.
4:32:02 PM
SENATOR SEEKINS moved the committee accept the House version of
Item 50.
Hearing no objection, the House version of Item 50 was adopted.
SENATOR SEEKINS moved the committee accept the House version of
Item 51.
REPRESENTATIVE HARRIS objected.
Item 51 remained open.
SENATOR SEEKINS moved the committee accept the House version of
Item 52.
SENATOR SEEKINS objected.
Item 52 remained open.
SENATOR SEEKINS moved the committee accept the House version of
Item 53.
Hearing no objection, the House version of Item 53 was adopted.
SENATOR SEEKINS moved the committee accept the House version of
Item 54.
Hearing no objection, the House version of Item 54 was adopted.
SENATOR SEEKINS moved the committee accept the Senate version of
Item 55.
SENATOR GUESS objected.
Item 55 remained open.
SENATOR SEEKINS moved the committee accept the Senate version of
Item 56.
Hearing no objection, the Senate version of Item 56 was adopted.
4:33:21 PM
SENATOR SEEKINS moved the committee accept the Senate version of
Item 57.
Hearing no objection, the Senate version of Item 57 was adopted.
SENATOR SEEKINS moved the committee accept the Senate version of
Item 58.
SENATOR GUESS objected.
Item 58 remained open.
4:33:41 PM
SENATOR SEEKINS moved the committee accept the Senate version of
Item 59.
SENATOR GUESS objected.
Item 59 remained open.
SENATOR SEEKINS moved the committee accept the House version of
Item 60.
Hearing no objection, the House version of Item 60 was adopted.
SENATOR SEEKINS moved the committee accept the House version of
Item 61.
Hearing no objection, the House version of Item 61 was adopted.
4:34:04 PM
SENATOR SEEKINS moved the committee accept the House version of
Item 62.
Hearing no objection, the House version of Item 62 was adopted.
SENATOR SEEKINS moved the committee accept the Senate version of
Item 63.
CHAIR BEN STEVENS objected.
Item 63 remained open.
SENATOR SEEKINS moved the committee accept the Senate version of
Item 64.
REPRESENTATIVE HARRIS objected.
Item 64 remained open.
SENATOR SEEKINS moved the committee accept the Senate version of
Item 65.
SENATOR GUESS objected.
Item 65 remained open.
SENATOR SEEKINS moved the committee accept the Senate version of
Item 66.
Hearing no objection, the motion carried.
4:34:43 PM
SENATOR SEEKINS moved the committee accept the House version of
Item 67.
CHAIR BEN STEVENS objected.
Item 67 remained open.
SENATOR SEEKINS moved the committee accept the House version of
Item 68.
Hearing no objection, the House version of Item 68 was adopted.
SENATOR SEEKINS moved the committee accept the House version of
Item 69.
Hearing no objection, the House version of Item 69 was adopted.
SENATOR SEEKINS moved the committee accept the Senate version of
Item 70.
Hearing no objection, the Senate version of Item 70 was adopted.
SENATOR SEEKINS moved the committee accept the Senate version of
Item 71.
[No objection was heard.]
4:35:26 PM
REPRESENTATIVE JOHN COGHILL asked that Item 70 remain open.
Item 70 remained open.
4:36:35 PM
REPRESENTATIVE HARRIS suggested that someone from the
administration come forward to answer questions when the open
items were considered.
CHAIR BEN STEVENS agreed.
REPRESENTATIVE HARRIS moved the committee accept the House
version of Item 2.
SENATOR GUESS objected for discussion purposes. She asked Mr.
Lisanki to go over the provision in the Senate version.
4:37:07 PM
MR. PAUL LISANKIE, Director, Division of Workers' Compensation,
Department of Labor and Workforce Development, deferred the
question to Ms. Linda Hall.
MS. LINDA HALL, Director, Division of Insurance, Department of
Commerce, Community & Economic Development advised she asked
that Item 2 be deleted from the bill. There are technical
problems associated with it.
SENATOR GUESS removed her objection.
With no further objection, Item 2 from the House version was
adopted.
REPRESENTATIVE HARRIS moved the committee accept the House
version of Item 4.
CHAIR BEN STEVENS objected. He asked Mr. Lisanki to comment.
4:38:45 PM
MR. LISANKIE said Section 4 deals with intent language, most of
which has already been adopted by the Legislature. This would be
the first time it is codified.
SENATOR SEEKINS asserted it was common practice of the Senate
Standing Judiciary Committee to have the findings section
eliminated from the bills unless absolutely necessary.
CHAIR BEN STEVENS responded the difference is codified law.
4:39:58 PM
SENATOR SEEKINS agreed and said he had no objection to the
intent being in the version as codified law.
MR. LISANKIE said he is not aware of any reason for the intent
and findings to be codified.
REPRESENTATIVE COGHILL suggested the language is constructive in
guiding the courts.
CHAIR BEN STEVENS said the language directs the body to be
impartial and fair to all parties. It might be wise to have that
codified.
REPRESENTATIVE COGHILL said that would be true of any panel.
There should be no reason to vote the language in.
CHAIR BEN STEVENS maintained his objection. He said it should be
codified that impartial action be taken.
REPRESENTATIVE GUTTENBERG said benefits would be decided on
merits unless otherwise decided by statute. He asked where in
statute it says that it not be on merits.
4:43:25 PM
MR. LISANKIE said he is not sure, but he believes it refers to
the fact that there are presumptions that apply in favor of
employees. No one wanted to get crosswise with the existing
presumptions in favor of employees.
CHAIR BEN STEVENS observed that number 4 is the intent. Items 1-
3 are already codified and Item 4 is the intent that it be
impartial and fair. He maintained his objection.
SENATOR SEEKINS voiced his support.
CHAIR BEN STEVENS called for a roll call vote on the motion to
adopt House version Item 4.
The motion failed with Senator Guess, Representative Harris,
Representative Coghill, and Representative Guttenberg voting yea
and Senator Seekins and Senator Ben Stevens voting nay.
REPRESENTATIVE HARRIS moved the committee accept the Senate
version of Item 4.
Hearing no objection, the Senate version of Item 4 was adopted.
4:46:25 PM
CHAIR BEN STEVENS called a brief at ease.
4:47:00 PM
REPRESENTATIVE HARRIS moved the committee accept the Senate
version of Item 5, but alter the panels to two.
CHAIR BEN STEVENS objected for discussion.
SENATOR SEEKINS explained until the committee received limited
powers, they could make no changes.
REPRESENTATIVE HARRIS withdrew the motion.
Item 5 remained open.
SENATOR SEEKINS moved the committee accept the Senate version of
Item 7.
REPRESENTATIVE COGHILL objected.
MR. LISANKIE explained the Department of Labor and Workforce
Development (DOLWD) would not have the option to contract with a
non-profit organization to work with injured workers who were
unable to get private attorneys. The DOLWD has heard from many
injured workers that are having trouble getting through the
system due to the limited number of private attorneys available
for representation. The DOLWD asked for funding to provide seed
money to contract with a non-profit organization.
REPRESENTATIVE HARRIS asked Mr. Lisanki whether he agreed with
the House version of Item 7.
MR. LISANKIE replied yes.
4:50:05 PM
SENATOR GUESS noted the House version does not have the
provision allowing the DOLWD to contract with a non-profit
agency to represent injured workers.
CHAIR BEN STEVENS clarified the Senate version would allow to
contract with non-profit and the House version would not.
REPRESENTATIVE GUTTENBERG asked Mr. Lisanki the process when an
injured worker does not get an attorney.
4:52:01 PM
MR. LISANKIE answered the contract would have to be figured in a
way that had a limited amount of services available.
SENATOR SEEKINS clarified the provision would allow the
department to contract with an agency that might help the
injured worker.
MR. LISANKIE agreed. DOLWD can offer information but they cannot
represent people.
SENATOR SEEKINS noted the provision is an assist to help people
get representation at state expense.
4:53:22 PM
REPRESENTATIVE HARRIS asked Mr. Lisanki the reason DOLWD would
contract with a non-profit.
MR. LISANKIE answered the intention was to try and come up with
an inexpensive way to address a problem. That being that some
people are unable to obtain a private attorney to represent
them.
SENATOR SEEKINS withdrew his motion to accept the Senate version
and moved to accept the House version of Item 7.
4:55:00 PM
SENATOR GUESS objected. She explained it is a needed service,
which would help the system run more smoothly.
CHAIR BEN STEVENS called for a roll call vote. The motion failed
with Senator Seekins, Representative Harris, Representative
Coghill, and Representative Guttenberg voting yea and Senator
Guess and Senator Ben Stevens voting nay.
Item 7 remained open.
4:57:07 PM
SENATOR SEEKINS moved the committee accept the Senate version of
Item 8.
REPRESENTATIVE HARRIS objected.
Item 8 remained open.
SENATOR SEEKINS moved the committee accept the Senate version of
Item 9.
REPRESENTATIVE HARRIS objected.
REPRESENTATIVE COGHILL explained it requires board approval,
which is tied to Item 8.
4:58:42 PM
MR. LISANKIE explained the distinction between the two
proposals. In the Senate bill if an attorney licensed in the
State of Alaska represents someone, they can reach a settlement
without having it approved by the current board unless they are
a minor or have a mental incompetency. The House version
requires board approval of any settlement.
4:59:47 PM
SENATOR SEEKINS aired the view that someone represented by an
attorney should have the right to stipulate when they want to.
He stated disinterest in establishing the requirement for board
approval.
SENATOR GUESS countered the committee should keep it in because
of the impact on all of the healthcare system. She maintained it
contributed to the public good.
5:02:08 PM
Brief at ease.
Representative Harris removed his objection.
The committee adopted the Senate version of Item 9.
5:03:17 PM
SENATOR SEEKINS moved the committee accept the Senate version of
Item 14.
SENATOR GUESS objected. She asked Mr. Lisanki whether a re-
injured worker could receive a second relocation benefit.
5:04:13 PM
MR. LISANKIE explained a person who has qualified for
reemployment benefits and goes back to work at the same type of
employment and is injured again would not be eligible for
reemployment benefits.
CHAIR STEVENS clarified after rehabilitation the person went
back to the same job and was re-injured.
SENATOR GUESS remembered the intent was if an injured worker
declined their benefits on a first injury and went back to the
job and incurred a new injury, that person would not be excluded
from a reemployment benefit.
MR. LISANKIE understood they would be excluded.
SENATOR GUESS clarified they would be permanently excluded.
5:06:11 PM
MR. LISANKIE said yes. He explained under the act Alaska has, if
a person accepts retraining benefits, which are based on the
expectation the person could not go back to the present job, and
the person goes back and gets re-injured, that person would not
be eligible for additional retraining benefits.
REPRESENTATIVE COGHILL voiced concern in an instance of a person
who was injured, retrained, and ten years later found themselves
in the same type of employment and was re-injured.
5:09:55 PM
MR. LISANKIE pointed out under the current authority the
eligibility for the retraining benefit is based on the finding a
person is permanently precluded from going back to that current
type of work.
CHAIR BEN STEVENS noted Items 14 and 15 are linked together.
REPRESENTATIVE HARRIS asked Mr. Lisanki to explain the intent of
Item 14.
MR. LISANKIE explained the concern with the additional
eligibility requirement is that people not accept a benefit that
is premised on need and later act in a way that is inconsistent
with that need.
5:14:48 PM
SENATOR SEEKINS said the only penalty is the state won't retrain
the injured worker a second time.
REPRESENTATIVE COGHILL agreed. He expressed a need for a medical
determination that an employee can never do the job again.
REPRESENTATIVE GUTTENBERG voiced concern once a benefit is
taken; there are lifetime denials for future benefits. If, 15 to
20 years later a person incurs the same injury they would be
denied.
5:18:45 PM
MR. LISANKIE said Alaska current reemployment benefits are all
keyed to physical abilities and physical demands of the job.
5:20:18 PM
SENATOR SEEKINS asked whether a person who accepts benefits
would receive a permanent or partial impairment rating.
MR. LISANKIE advised they may or may not. Eligibility is
conditioned on an expert opinion.
SENATOR SEEKINS asserted an injured worker would not unknowingly
return to the same type of work they were injured at. A
physician would tell the worker they were either partially or
permanently disabled and should not do physical work.
MR. LISANKIE agreed someone would have to make that
determination or the worker wouldn't even be eligible for
benefits.
SENATOR SEEKINS asserted when someone knowingly goes back; the
obligation of Alaska should cease.
5:22:25 PM
SENATOR GUESS expressed concern over the job dislocation
benefit, which is a payout instead of retraining. There is no
provision allowing someone who realizes they made a poor
decision to go back and amend that decision.
5:23:11 PM
CHAIR BEN STEVENS asked for a roll call vote on adopting the
Senate version of Item 14.
The motion failed with Senator Seekins and Senator Ben Stevens
voting yea and Representative Harris, Representative Coghill,
Representative Guttenberg and Senator Guess voting nay.
Item 14 remained open.
SENATOR SEEKINS moved the committee accept the House version of
Item 15.
5:24:38 PM
CHAIR BEN STEVENS objected.
CHAIR BEN STEVENS asked for a roll call vote.
The motion failed with Representative Coghill, Representative
Guttenberg, Senator Guess and Representative Harris voting yea
and Senator Seekins and Senator Ben Stevens voting nay.
Item 15 remained open.
5:25:23 PM
Senator Seekins moved the committee accept the Senate version of
Item 16.
Hearing no objection, the Senate version of Item 16 was adopted.
Senator Seekins moved the committee accept the Senate version of
Item 25.
Representative Harris objected and stated the need for different
powers in order to accept the Senate version.
Item 25 remained open.
5:26:16 PM
SENATOR SEEKINS moved the committee accept the House version of
Item 26.
Hearing no objection, the House version of Item 26 was adopted.
SENATOR SEEKINS moved the committee accept the Senate version of
Item 27.
REPRESENTATIVE GUTTENBERG objected. He expressed concern over
the limit of palliative care.
SENATOR SEEKINS advised there was quite a debate on this in the
Senate Standing Judiciary Committee. They established a limit
unless it is needed to enable an employee to continue employment
or participate in vocational rehabilitation or to treat chronic
debilitating pain.
SENATOR GUESS remarked since there is a task force and a medical
review committee assigned, the item should not be adopted.
5:29:19 PM
SENATOR SEEKINS stated the palliative care section is closely
patterned after Oregon.
REPRESENTATIVE GUTTENBERG mentioned palliative care can become
an argument between opposing attorneys and opposing doctors.
REPRESENTATIVE HARRIS asked if palliative care would it be
covered if it were needed to keep a person on the job.
MR. LISANKIE answered yes it would fall under the qualification
of enabling one to continue employment.
REPRESENTATIVE HARRIS asked whether fraud was covered in SB 130.
5:32:12 PM
MR. LISANKIE cautioned the committee about defining something as
fraud. He said some healthcare modalities enable a person to
make them feel well enough to keep work.
SENATOR SEEKINS expressed concern that people could convince
their physicians of what treatments are necessary. He said he is
trying to eliminate the "feel-good" treatments versus those
necessary to treat the injury.
REPRESENTATIVE COGHILL said he is still struggling with the
dueling doctors scenario.
5:35:52 PM
MR. LISANKIE said:
In that scenario, the challenge might come if someone
was aware of your medical condition, say your
insurance company would be paying for your medical
care, and if you had a condition that didn't in their
minds correspond with chronic debilitating pain for
most people, and I wouldn't want to get too much more
specific than that, then under the act currently, they
are entitled to ask you to go to an independent
medical examination. Typically I would see them asking
that independent medical examiner to confirm whether
the condition is something that would cause chronic
debilitating pain. That would be the kind of duel you
could get into there.
SENATOR SEEKINS said under the statute, the injured person is
allowed to have their choice of attending physician. The system
provides a check and balance when the independent medical
examination comes into play.
5:38:26 PM
REPRESENTATIVE GUTTENBERG asked what happens when there are
differing opinions.
CHAIR STEVENS announced the committee would vote on the motion
to adopt the Senate version of Item 27.
The motion failed with Senator Seekins and Senator Ben Stevens
voting yea and Representative Harris, Representative Coghill,
Representative Guttenberg and Senator Guess voting nay.
CHAIR STEVENS adjourned the meeting at 5:39:13 PM.
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|