Legislature(2021 - 2022)BUTROVICH 205
02/02/2022 01:30 PM Senate JUDICIARY
Note: the audio
and video
recordings are distinct records and are obtained from different sources. As such there may be key differences between the two. The audio recordings are captured by our records offices as the official record of the meeting and will have more accurate timestamps. Use the icons to switch between them.
| Audio | Topic |
|---|---|
| Start | |
| SB119 | |
| HB155 | |
| HB3 | |
| SB31 | |
| SB129 | |
| SB118 | |
| Adjourn |
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
| += | HB 3 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| += | HB 155 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| += | SB 31 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| += | SB 119 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | SB 118 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | TELECONFERENCED | ||
| += | SB 129 | TELECONFERENCED | |
SB 129-ELECTION PAMPHLET INFORMATION RE: JUDGES
2:28:05 PM
CHAIR HOLLAND announced the consideration of SENATE BILL NO. 129
"An Act relating to information on judicial officers provided in
election pamphlets."
[This was the third hearing for SB 129. The committee previously
heard SB 129 on May 5, 2021 and January 28, 2022. The committee
adopted a committee substitute (CS) for SB 129, Version O; and
public testimony was opened and closed on January 28, 2022.]
2:28:31 PM
SENATOR HUGHES stated that the first time a judge is up for a
retention election, the election pamphlet must include a list of
items. Currently, all judges must submit their business,
professional, and educational backgrounds. These judges do not
need to submit certain items during subsequent retention
elections. She recalled that the Alaska Judicial Council (AJC)
found that the relevancy of the experience diminishes over time.
However, if it is good to have the information initially, it
remains relevant because the voters may forget details about
them. She related her understanding that the voter turnover rate
is high. Thus, some voters may never have reviewed the
biographical information on judges seeking retention. Further,
it would standardize the information required. She asked the
sponsor to consider requiring the exact biographical details for
subsequent judicial retention elections.
2:31:00 PM
SENATOR MYERS responded that he made this change based on advice
from AJC. For example, judges are prohibited from participating
in partisan political events and running for political office.
He related that other things would still apply, including
education or continuing education. He explained that he was
balancing the applicability, relevant information, and space
available in election pamphlets. He wants to provide sufficient,
relevant information to allow voters to make decisions. Still,
providing too much information in the voter pamphlet could lead
to voters tuning out the information. For example, time spent as
a trial lawyer might not be relevant once a judge has spent
considerable time on the bench.
2:33:05 PM
SENATOR HUGHES offered her view that it is a fairness issue for
voters since they should view the same pertinent information.
SENATOR MYERS suggested that some voters might be prompted to
search for additional information. He noted that AJC retains
that information, maintains a website, and he hoped that the
election pamphlet would direct voters to the specific judicial
background information on AJC's website.
2:35:16 PM
At ease
2:35:42 PM
CHAIR HOLLAND reconvened the meeting. He asked about the reason
for the title change.
2:36:25 PM
CLAIRE RADFORD, Attorney, Legislative Legal Services,
Legislative Affairs Agency Juneau, Alaska, responded that the
title was amended because Section 1 was added related to AS
15.58.030(g). This differs from the original version of the
bill.
2:36:59 PM
SENATOR HUGHES said she was still unsure why the title change
was necessary.
2:37:16 PM
MS. RADFORD read the previous title of SB 129, work order 32-
LS0751\B, "An Act relating to information on judicial officers
provided in election pamphlets." Section 1, AS 15.58.030(g) was
amended in Version O, related to the information a judge files.
The title was changed to "An Act relating to information on
judicial officers seeking retention in office." She stated that
the title change reflects the broader title.
2:38:35 PM
CHAIR HOLLAND held SB 129 in committee.
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|---|---|
| SB 119 Sponsor's Statement.pdf |
SJUD 2/2/2022 1:30:00 PM |
SB 119 |
| SB 119 Sectional Final.pdf |
SJUD 2/2/2022 1:30:00 PM |
SB 119 |
| SB 31 - Sectional Analysis.pdf |
SJUD 2/2/2022 1:30:00 PM |
SB 31 |
| SB 31 - Sponsor Statement.pdf |
SJUD 2/2/2022 1:30:00 PM |
SB 31 |
| HB 3 Amendment (SJUD).pdf |
SJUD 2/2/2022 1:30:00 PM |
HB 3 |
| SB 129 SJUD Amendment O.3.pdf |
SJUD 2/2/2022 1:30:00 PM |
SB 129 |
| SB 129 SJUD Amendment O.4.pdf |
SJUD 2/2/2022 1:30:00 PM |
SB 129 |
| SB 129 SJUD Amendment O.2.pdf |
SJUD 2/2/2022 1:30:00 PM |
SB 129 |
| SJC - SB 119 Testimony, 2022-2-1.pdf |
SJUD 2/2/2022 1:30:00 PM |
SB 119 |
| HB 3 Public Testimony.pdf |
SJUD 2/2/2022 1:30:00 PM |
HB 3 |
| SB 119 SJUD Public Testimony through 2.12.22.pdf |
SJUD 2/2/2022 1:30:00 PM |
SB 119 |