Legislature(1999 - 2000)
05/17/1999 09:40 AM House FIN
| Audio | Topic |
|---|
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
CS FOR SENATE BILL NO. 128(FIN)
An Act moving the termination date of the Board of
Storage Tank Assistance to June 30, 1999; relating to
the storage tank assistance fund, to financial
assistance for owners and operators of underground
petroleum storage tank systems, and to discharges from
underground petroleum storage tank systems; and
providing for an effective date.
ANNETTE KREITZER, STAFF, SENATOR LOREN LEMAN, stated that it
was clarified during Conference Committee that the intent of
the fiscal note was to add back five positions. The $58.2
thousand dollars is the difference between what the
Conference Committee agreed upon and what would constitute
five positions.
Representative J. Davies pointed out that problems result
because only six positions now exist with work effort being
reduced next year and the total number of positions cut will
be ten. The Department of Environmental Conservation has
made the decision to de-emphasize that program because of
the lack of needed manpower.
BARBARA FRANK, DIRECTOR, DIVISION OF ADMINISTRATIVE
SERVICES, DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION, noted
that there has been ten total positions cut out of the
program. With that size cut, the Department would not be
able to implement the bill. There is no point in the
Department funding the Board for the storage tank assistance
to write regulations in order to establish a program which
the Department will not be able to afford to implement.
Co-Chair Mulder questioned how many staff people remained in
that program. Ms. Frank replied that only twenty of the
thirty employed positions remained which the Department had
in FY99, leaving a 10-position cut. The Department has
chosen not to implement a Board with that cut. There would
be no staff to implement or issue clean up programs and
grants. Therefore, no need exists to write regulations for
a new program. Co-Chair Mulder offered that there possibly
no need for Department of Environmental Conservation then.
He emphasized his resentment that the Department could
indicate that there is "no need" for a program because of
staff cuts. Ms. Frank restated the Department's priority
for the twenty remaining positions:
* The prevention program; and
* The above ground storage tanks.
Ms. Frank continued, there are some federally funded staff
who can only work on federally approved clean-ups. All
State funded staff that could work on the clean up program
have been eliminated. Co-Chair Mulder countered that was
not the intent during budget discussion but instead a
decision made by the Department.
Representative J. Davies advised that the number of
positions funded for the clean up program was six and that
the budgetary level of effort has been reduced from $3
million dollars to $1 million dollars. Representative G.
Davis asked if the prevention program was more important
than the underground storage oil clean up. Ms. Frank
replied that the Department in not preventing leaks but
merely cleaning up leaks would create a never-ending cycle.
She believed that prevention investment program would help
to stabilize requests for additional clean up dollars.
Representative Bunde commented that if the Department has
decided not to implement the legislation, the fiscal notes
should be stripped out and the bill left in Committee.
Representative Grussendorf argued that this is not the
entirety of the work of the Department of Environmental
Conservation. They are responsible for monitoring air and
water quality and food protection. The bill addresses
providing grants and assistance to the small business
owners. The Department must be able make a choice as to
what is monitored and what will happen to this particular
program in the best interest of the public and the State.
Representative Bunde clarified that if the bill is passed,
the five positions added back would be funded, and if the
bill is not passed, they would not be added back into the
funding mechanism. Co-Chair Mulder agreed.
Representative Williams MOVED to report HCS CSSB 128 (FIN)
out of Committee with individual recommendations and with
the accompanying fiscal notes. Representative Bunde
OBJECTED.
A roll call vote was taken on the motion.
IN FAVOR: Moses, Williams, Austerman, J. Davies, G.
Davis, Foster, Grussendorf, Kohring, Mulder
OPPOSED: Bunde
Co-Chair Therriault was not present for the vote.
The MOTION PASSED (9-1).
HCS CSSB 128(FIN) was reported out of Committee with "no
recommendations" and with a fiscal note by the Department of
Law dated 5/15/99 and a new note by the House Finance
Committee.
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|