Legislature(2005 - 2006)BELTZ 211
04/28/2005 03:30 PM Senate STATE AFFAIRS
| Audio | Topic |
|---|---|
| Start | |
| SB121 | |
| SB122 | |
| HB181 | |
| HB201 | |
| HB229 | |
| Adjourn |
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
| + | HB 181 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | HB 201 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | HB 229 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| = | SB 121 | ||
| = | SB 122 | ||
SB 122-AMERADA HESS INCOME; CAPITAL INCOME ACCT.
CHAIR THERRIAULT announced SB 122 to be up for consideration. He
said he understood that the House version of the bill was under
reconsideration. He asked Ms. Frasca if modifications had been
made that the committee should consider.
3:40:43 PM
CHERYL FRASCA, Director, Office of Management & Budget, replied
the House amended the companion to SB 122 [HB 187] and Mr.
Barnhill would provide an explanation.
MIKE BARNHILL, Assistant Attorney General, Department of Law
(DOL), explained that both the House bill and SB 122 create a
fund within the earnings reserve of the Alaska Permanent Fund.
The House took the fund out of the earnings reserve of the
Permanent Fund and put it in the General Fund. It also changed
the name from Capital Income Account to Capital Income Fund.
The earnings that flow from the segregated Amerada Hess
principal would go into the new fund within the General Fund and
be available for appropriation. The House didn't adopt the idea
of using those earnings to finance a bond issue as Governor
Murkowski originally proposed.
Another change the House made related to inflation proofing. It
ensured that the money that was segregated within the principal
of the Alaska Permanent Fund would continue to be inflation
proofed. He noted that at the previous hearing Senator
Therriault asked why it was accounted for within the "picket
fence." Under the House version, all the inflation proofing will
happen outside the "picket fence." The nominal amount would stay
the same, but the entire principal of the Permanent fund would
continue to be inflation proofed.
3:43:34 PM
SENATOR KIM ELTON asked for verification that Amerada Hess would
not be inflation proofed. The inflation proofing that would have
covered it would be in the corpus of the Permanent Fund.
MR. BARNHILL responded yes.
SENATOR ELTON said if you assume it is being inflation proofed
now it would be slightly more than inflation proofed then.
MR. BARNHILL offered the opinion that it's a stretch to say that
any one part of the principal of the Permanent Fund is inflation
proofed. The Permanent Fund Corporation has been accounting for
the inflation proofing separately, but that's just book
accounting. The bill the House passed clarifies that the
inflation proofing would be accounted for outside the segregated
principal of Amerada Hess.
SENATOR ELTON said in that event the Amerada Hess sub-account
would diminish over time due to inflationary erosion.
CHAIR THERRIAULT clarified that the purchasing power would erode
but when forced to say were it occurs, the inflation proofing is
on the outside of the "picket fence."
SENATOR WAGONER remarked that doesn't keep the legislature from
putting money back in to inflation proof the principal.
MR. BARNHILL opined the legislature could direct the Permanent
Fund Corporation to book the inflation proofing within the
Amerada Hess "picket fence." The earnings from the Amerada Hess
segregated fund would continue to flow out under the House bill
and into the General Fund.
SENATOR WAGONER said total earnings.
MR. BARNHILL responded the total earnings on $424 million. That
figure would stay the same throughout time.
SENATOR WAGONER said he didn't agree.
CHAIR THERRIAULT remarked it's apparent there are a variety of
ideas. Nonetheless, the question before the committee is whether
it wants to incorporate the House ideas as a CS or just move the
bill with its companion piece.
SENATOR ELTON stated his preference is to move the bill as is.
He and Senator Davis accede to the finance co-chairs' request to
move the bill.
CHAIR THERRIAULT asked if he would like to make the motion.
SENATOR ELTON motioned to report SB 122 and attached zero fiscal
note from committee with individual recommendations.
CHAIR THERRIAULT announced that without objection, SB 122 would
move to the Finance Committee.
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|