Legislature(2011 - 2012)BELTZ 105 (TSBldg)
02/23/2012 01:30 PM Senate LABOR & COMMERCE
| Audio | Topic |
|---|---|
| Start | |
| SB175 | |
| SB122 | |
| SB25 | |
| SB174 | |
| Adjourn |
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
| += | SB 25 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| += | SB 175 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| += | SB 122 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| += | SB 174 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| += | SB 116 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| *+ | SB 190 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | HB 168 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| += | SB 138 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| += | SB 157 | TELECONFERENCED | |
SB 122-REAL ESTATE TRANSFER FEES/TITLE PLANTS
2:04:56 PM
CHAIR EGAN announced consideration of SB 122.
DANA OWEN, staff to the Senate Labor and Commerce Committee,
said at the last hearing on this bill they discussed an
amendment that would be forthcoming and it would answer issues
that had been raised amongst title insurers.
SENATOR PASKVAN moved to adopt Amendment 1 to CSSB 122(CRA),
version 27-LS0789\B.
CHAIR EGAN objected for discussion.
MR. OWEN explained that the one goal of the amendment is to
anchor title searches to the State of Alaska. Concerns have been
expressed to their office that because there is so much
offshoring of this kind of "back office" sort of work that we
would lose our ability to have title insurance searches done by
somebody who has an actual connection to Alaska and whose local
knowledge may prove instrumental in making sure that the title
searches are defensible. In order to do that, this amendment
adds a requirement that a title insurance contract can't be
issued until an examination has been done by a licensed title
insurance limited producer. Among the requirements to become a
licensed title insurance limited producer is one that you have a
locus (physical presence) of business in the state. This doesn't
guarantee that with online technology people outside the state
couldn't do the research, but it would at least mandate that one
person or a business located in Alaska has the final authority
to approve it.
The second section of the bill requires that a title insurance
limited producer must be a resident of the State of Alaska. A
memo in their packets argues that this may be in violation of
the privileges and immunities clause of the U.S. Constitution.
Anytime Alaska residency is required, this issue is raised.
Bills in the past have passed with these kinds of provisions and
the committee could decide to embrace that. This language has
been vetted between two contending factions in the title
industry, both of which are okay with this now.
2:08:56 PM
SENATOR MENARD said she wanted to hear from MatSu Title
Insurance.
2:10:22 PM
MIKE PRICE, owner, Fidelity Title Insurance in Anchorage and
Mat-Su Title Insurance in Wasilla said he is currently president
of the Alaska Land Title Association and that the CS is
acceptable to all members of the industry and they support its
passage. He said about 13 states had passed very similar
legislation in the last three or four years that specify
residents of their states will be the only licensed examiners
within those states. Since the last committee meeting, he,
personally, had been solicited three times from India and that
is the kind of thing they are trying to prohibit.
SENATOR MENARD said it's comforting to hear that he is
satisfied.
CHAIR EGAN asked Ms. Hall what she thought of the latest
version.
2:12:35 PM
LINDA HALL, Director, Division of Insurance, Department of
Commerce, Community and Economic Development (DCCED), said she
was pleased to hear Mr. Price testify that industry agrees with
this version, and she is especially supportive of Section 1,
because it clarifies there has to be at least a physical
location from which to do the title examination search in the
state. Language in Section 2 about off shore outsourcing was
strictly a legislative call, she said, and she understood
industry's concerns about it.
2:13:49 PM
SENATOR PASKVAN moved to report CSSB 122(L&C), as amended by
amendment B.2, from committee with individual recommendations
and attached zero fiscal note. There were no objections, and it
was so ordered.
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|---|---|
| SB 125 lttr supporting, AADA.pdf |
SL&C 2/23/2012 1:30:00 PM |
SB 125 |
| SB 125 Purpose of bill.PDF |
SL&C 2/23/2012 1:30:00 PM |
SB 125 |
| SB 125 Sectional Analysis - 2-3-12.pdf |
SL&C 2/23/2012 1:30:00 PM |
SB 125 |
| SB 125 Sponsor Statement.PDF |
SL&C 2/23/2012 1:30:00 PM |
SB 125 |
| SB 25 lttr supporting, AGC.pdf |
SL&C 2/23/2012 1:30:00 PM |
SB 25 |
| SB 25 lttr supporting, ARCTEC 021512.pdf |
SL&C 2/23/2012 1:30:00 PM |
SB 25 |
| SB 25 lttr supporting, MEA 021512.pdf |
SL&C 2/23/2012 1:30:00 PM |
SB 25 |
| SB 25 lttr supporting, RDC corrected 021712.pdf |
SL&C 2/23/2012 1:30:00 PM |
SB 25 |
| SB025-DCCED-AIDEA-02-10-12 (A).pdf |
SL&C 2/23/2012 1:30:00 PM |
SB 25 |
| SB025-DCCED-AIDEA-02-10-12 (B).pdf |
SL&C 2/23/2012 1:30:00 PM |
SB 25 |
| SB 25 ASSETS version E.PDF |
SL&C 2/23/2012 1:30:00 PM |
SB 25 |
| SB 25 lttr supporting, AIPPA 021612.pdf |
SL&C 2/23/2012 1:30:00 PM |
SB 25 |
| SB 175 CS L&C v B DRAFT.PDF |
SL&C 2/23/2012 1:30:00 PM |
SB 175 |
| SB 116 lttr opposing, ANC Muni Risk Mgt..pdf |
SL&C 2/23/2012 1:30:00 PM |
SB 116 |
| SB 116 lttr opposing, ABC 022212.PDF |
SL&C 2/23/2012 1:30:00 PM |
SB 116 |