Legislature(1997 - 1998)
04/16/1997 09:07 AM Senate HES
| Audio | Topic |
|---|
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
SB 122 INS.COVERAGE:MARRIAGE & FAMILY THERAPIST
Number 459
CHAIRMAN WILKEN introduced SB 122 as the next order of business.
He noted that there was a CS from the Labor & Commerce Committee,
when saying that he would entertain a motion to place it before the
committee.
SENATOR WARD moved to adopt CSSB 122(L&C) for discussion purposes.
Without objection, CSSB 122(L&C) was adopted.
RACHEAL MORELAND , Staff to Senator Leman, read the following
Sponsor statement into the record:
Senate Bill 122 was introduced by the Labor and Commerce Committee
at the request of the Alaska Association for Marriage and Family
Therapy (AAMFT). SB 122 will add marital and family therapists to
the list of providers against whom insurers may not discriminate.
This bill does not require insurers to add coverage of marital and
family therapists where the coverage currently is not provided. It
merely requires that insurers treat marital and family therapists
on equal footing with other licensed providers and extend the same
opportunities for coverage that the insurer offers others providing
the same services. The definition of unfair discrimination is
clarified by this bill and codifies existing practice.
Section 1, paragraph 1 adds marital and family therapists to the
unfair discrimination list under group health insurance policies
with an effective date of July 1, 1997. Paragraph 2 defines unfair
discrimination.
Legislation (Section 4, ch. 39, SLA 1993) affecting the unfair
discrimination clause was passed in 1993 with an effective date of
1998. Section 2 repeals and reenacts this section to reflect the
addition of marital and family therapists and the definition of
unfair discrimination.
Currently, health insurers offering mental health services may not
discriminate against licensed psychologists, psychological
associates or clinical social workers. SB 122 would allow those
insured with mental health coverage to choose treatment from a
licensed marital and family therapist.
AAMFT is a division of the American Association for Marriage and
Family Therapy, Inc. Marriage and family therapists (MFTs) are a
group of mental health professionals with background in a variety
of disciplines, including psychology, social work, and family
social science. MFTs are licensed or certified in 37 states and
are recognized by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services
as one of the five core mental health disciplines in the U.S.
CATHERINE REARDON , Director of the Division of Occupational
Licensing in the Department of Commerce & Economic Development,
informed the committee that the Board of Marital and Family
Therapists works in association with this division. The board
supports the inclusion of MFTs in this nondiscrimination clause.
SENATOR LEMAN inquired as to how many people are licensed by the
board in this category. CATHERINE REARDON said that at the
beginning of this fiscal year, there were 181 persons licensed in
this category.
Number 515
BEVERLY LINDELL , President of AAMFT, requested the committee's
support for SB 122. Ms. Lindell noted that SB 122 does not mandate
coverage nor increase the scope of service nor does the bill
include any willing provider language. This legislation is
important for fairness. Ms. Lindell noted that MFTs have been
licensed in this state since 1992 and pay fees to provide that
service. MFTs are also one of the five core mental health groups
identified by the National Institute of Mental Health.
With regard to the concern of cost, Ms. Lindell informed the
committee that the Division of Insurance reported that there is no
evidence that costs would increase due to the increase in the pool
of providers. In fact, the effect of competition may actually
decrease the costs. Ms. Lindell explained that MFTs tend to be
solution focused which results in achieving a job efficiently and
quickly which could result in reduced costs to insurers. Ms.
Lindell also noted that a survey in the American Psychologist
reported that consumers refer to MFTs more often than other mental
health professionals. Further there has been much information
about family problems across the nation and in Alaska which has the
highest rate of teen suicide and sexual abuse. MFTs are the groups
that have expertise in that area and would like to practice that
with reimbursement.
CHAIRMAN WILKEN asked Ms. Burke to explain the term "unfair
discrimination" to the committee.
MARIANNE BURKE , Director of the Division of Insurance for DCED,
explained that "unfair discrimination" does not include the purpose
of utilization review for standards of clinical appropriate health
care which Ms. Burke could support. With regard to cost
containment, Ms. Burke was a bit concerned that it could be used to
force an individual to seek the cheapest service available. Ms.
Burke pointed out that the process of utilization review is a cost
containment measure. Clinically appropriate health care services
have elements of cost containment. Ms. Burke believed that the
amendment helps clarify this section of Title 21.
SENATOR LEMAN did not intend for "cost containment" to mean that
the lowest cost provider must be utilized, but rather that the
appropriate provider be utilized. Senator Leman pointed out that
there may be appropriate measures to contain cost which would not
be an unfair discrimination practice.
CHAIRMAN WILKEN asked if Ms. Burke had heard from insurance
companies in Alaska with regard to the amendment. MARIANNE BURKE
had only heard from one writer of health insurance in the state who
favored the amendment.
SENATOR LEMAN moved to report CSSB 122(L&C) out of committee with
individual recommendations and the accompanying zero fiscal note.
Without objection, it was so ordered.
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|