Legislature(2021 - 2022)GRUENBERG 120
05/17/2021 01:00 PM House JUDICIARY
Note: the audio
and video
recordings are distinct records and are obtained from different sources. As such there may be key differences between the two. The audio recordings are captured by our records offices as the official record of the meeting and will have more accurate timestamps. Use the icons to switch between them.
| Audio | Topic |
|---|---|
| Start | |
| SB122 | |
| SB65 | |
| Adjourn |
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
| + | TELECONFERENCED | ||
| += | SB 122 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| += | SB 65 | TELECONFERENCED | |
SB 122-VICTIM DEFINITION
1:37:29 PM
CHAIR CLAMAN announced that the first order of business would be
SENATE BILL NO. 122, "An Act relating to the definition of
'victim.'"
CHAIR CLAMAN stated that Legislative Legal & Research services
was authorized to make any technical or conforming changes to
the bill.
1:38:09 PM
REPRESENTATIVE KURKA moved Amendment 2 labeled 32-LS0422\B.2,
Dunmire, 5/15/21, which read:
Page 1, line 5, following "perpetrated;":
Insert "or"
Page 1, line 7:
Delete "or"
Insert "[OR]"
Following "incapacitated":
Insert ", or dead"
Page 1, line 9:
Delete "; or"
Insert "or who was living in a spousal relationship
with the person specified in (A) of this paragraph
when the person died; [OR]"
Page 1, line 10:
Delete "adult"
Insert "[ADULT]"
Following "child":
Insert ", brother, sister, grandparent, grandchild"
Page 1, line 11, following "person;":
Insert "or
(iii) any other interested person, as may be
designated by a person having authority in law to do
so"
Page 1, line 12, through page 2, line 4:
Delete all material and insert:
"[(C) ONE OF THE FOLLOWING, NOT THE PERPETRATOR, IF
THE PERSON SPECIFIED IN (A) OF THIS PARAGRAPH IS DEAD:
(i) A PERSON LIVING IN A SPOUSAL RELATIONSHIP WITH
THE DECEASED BEFORE THE DECEASED DIED;
(ii) AN ADULT CHILD, PARENT, BROTHER, SISTER,
GRANDPARENT, OR GRANDCHILD OF THE DECEASED; OR
(iii) ANY OTHER INTERESTED PERSON, AS MAY BE
DESIGNATED BY A PERSON HAVING AUTHORITY IN LAW TO DO
SO]."
REPRESENTATIVE SNYDER objected.
REPRESENTATIVE KURKA explained that the intent of Amendment 2
would be to consolidate the definitions of victims listed in the
proposed bill.
CHAIR CLAMAN referred to a message from the General Counsel of
the Alaska Court System which conveyed that, under 12.45.015,
introduction of the victim and criminal defendant to the jury,
and that, under subsection (a), during jury selection and part
of an opening statement at trial, a trial attorney may introduce
the victim and defendant to the jury, and it had expressed
concern that Amendment 2 could subject very young victims to a
jury in the midst of a criminal trial.
1:40:30 PM
REPRESENTATIVE SNYDER asked whether a youth may or may not be
called to trial under currently law.
CHAIR CLAMAN answered that this Amendment 2 would not pertain to
testimony at a trial but to the introduction of a victim during
a jury trial.
REPRESENTATIVE SNYDER suggested that there had been disagreement
of whether it would be appropriate to allow introduction of
minor victims during trial.
CHAIR CLAMAN allowed that there exists a very different
perspective between matters concerning a victim at age 15 and a
victim at age 3.
REPRESENTATIVE SNYDER asked whether the proposed amendment would
compel a minor to testify at trial.
CHAIR CLAMAN answered that the statute contained the word "may"
and that a larger concern would be a hypothetical situation in
which the picture of a baby who may have been impacted [by an
alleged crime] was presented during jury selection and could be
prejudicial to the trial process.
REPRESENTATIVE KURKA characterized the concerns brought forth by
the court system were valid and suggested that the same concern
would exist with the underlying bill. He noted that brothers
and sisters who may or may not be adults should be included as
victims.
CHAIR CLAMAN stated that he would not speak on behalf of the
General Counsel for the Alaska Court System but speculated that,
if she were present to offer testimony, might suggest that the
question of Amendment 2 would be one of a policy decision by the
legislature.
1:44:44 PM
The committee took an at-ease from 1:44 p.m. to 1:45 p.m.
1:46:03 PM
TAYLOR WINSTON, Director, Office of Victims' Rights, stated that
the existing definition of victim consists of three separate
sets of victims and the court system had pointed out potential
difficulties in merging them. She stated that additional issues
that may have not been vetted and contemplated may exist should
the three sets be combined.
CHAIR CLAMAN asked whether the Office of Victims' Rights
supported the proposed amendment, which Ms. Winston answered
that it did not support the proposed amendment.
1:48:21 PM
REPRESENTATIVE EASTMAN asked whether there existed a benefit to
allowing adult siblings to qualify as victims.
MS. WINSTON answered that it was her belief that it would
diminish existing rights and explained that in a homicide, all
family members are affected and that an individual's minor
status should not preclude him/her from victim status.
1:49:18 PM
REPRESENTATIVE SNYDER asked whether the Office of Victims'
Rights did not support the proposed amendment solely because it
had not been fully vetted by the organization or based on its
merits.
MS. WINSTON allowed that ample time to review the potential
impacts of the proposed amendment but stated that, in her
professional experience, no issues had arisen due to the three
separate groups of victims and suggested that ongoing
discussions or examination of other areas of law may still be
appropriate.
REPRESENTATIVE KURKA asked the reason for a qualifying
difference between victims defined in subsections (b) and in (c)
and suggested that minor children should be included as victims
in subsection (c).
MS. WINSTON answered that the original intent of SB 122 differed
from that which was trying to be gained through amendments. She
stated that all victims are defined in subsection (a) and that
victims identified under (b)(i) and (b)(ii) could have victims
rights expanded to include minors due to an exception that may
be made due to an individual's minor status or incapacity, and
the bill would allow an adult individual to advocate on the
minor's behalf. She allowed that other areas of law may exist
that the change to definition could exist to achieve the stated
goals of the amendment, she stated her belief that there could
be unintended consequences should the amendment be adopted and
HB 122 pass.
1:56:35 PM
REPRESENTATIVE KURKA stated that he considered the amendment
reasonable and potential scenarios existed where adult and minor
children should be defined as victims.
REPRESENTATIVE SNYDER maintained her objection to the motion to
adopt Amendment 2.
1:57:58 PM
A roll call vote was taken. Representatives Kurka, Snyder,
Kreiss-Tomkins, and Eastman voted in favor of Amendment 2 to SB
122. Representatives Vance, Drummond, and Claman voted against
it. Therefore, Amendment 2 was adopted by a vote of 4-3. SB
122, as amended, was before the committee.
1:59:44 PM
REPRESENTATIVE EASTMAN expressed his appreciation to the bill
sponsor to examine the existing statute to include additional
victims.
REPRESENTATIVE KURKA expressed his support for SB 122.
2:01:08 PM
REPRESENTATIVE SNYDER moved to report SB 122, as amended, out of
committee with individual recommendations and the accompanying
fiscal notes. There being no objection, HCS SB 122(JUD) was
reported out of the House Judiciary Standing Committee.
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|---|---|
| SB 122 v. B 4.7.2021.PDF |
HJUD 5/10/2021 1:00:00 PM HJUD 5/12/2021 1:00:00 PM HJUD 5/14/2021 1:00:00 PM HJUD 5/17/2021 1:00:00 PM |
SB 122 |
| SB 122 Sponsor Statement v. B.pdf |
HJUD 5/10/2021 1:00:00 PM HJUD 5/12/2021 1:00:00 PM HJUD 5/14/2021 1:00:00 PM HJUD 5/17/2021 1:00:00 PM SJUD 4/21/2021 1:30:00 PM |
SB 122 |
| SB 122 Sectional Analysis v. B.pdf |
HJUD 5/10/2021 1:00:00 PM HJUD 5/12/2021 1:00:00 PM HJUD 5/14/2021 1:00:00 PM HJUD 5/17/2021 1:00:00 PM SJUD 4/21/2021 1:30:00 PM |
SB 122 |
| SB 122 v. B Amendment #2 HJUD 5.17.2021.pdf |
HJUD 5/17/2021 1:00:00 PM |
SB 122 |
| SB 122 Fiscal Note LAW-CRIM 4.9.2021.pdf |
HJUD 5/10/2021 1:00:00 PM HJUD 5/12/2021 1:00:00 PM HJUD 5/14/2021 1:00:00 PM HJUD 5/17/2021 1:00:00 PM |
SB 122 |
| SB 65 Work Draft Committee Substitute v. R 5.17.2021.pdf |
HJUD 5/17/2021 1:00:00 PM |
SB 65 |
| SB 65 Sponsor Statement 2.4.2021.pdf |
HHSS 4/27/2021 3:00:00 PM HHSS 4/29/2021 3:00:00 PM HHSS 5/4/2021 3:00:00 PM HJUD 5/5/2021 1:00:00 PM HJUD 5/17/2021 1:00:00 PM SHSS 2/16/2021 1:30:00 PM |
SB 65 |
| SB 65 Supporting Document - Letters Received by 5.17.2021.pdf |
HJUD 5/17/2021 1:00:00 PM |
SB 65 |
| SB 65 Amend Letters and Testimony Received by 5.17.2021.pdf |
HJUD 5/17/2021 1:00:00 PM |
SB 65 |
| SB 65 Additional Document - AMA Article When Is a Patient-Physician Relationship Established (Distributed by HJUD Committee).pdf |
HJUD 5/17/2021 1:00:00 PM |
SB 65 |
| SB 65 Fiscal Note LAW-CIV 2.12.2021.pdf |
HJUD 5/5/2021 1:00:00 PM HJUD 5/17/2021 1:00:00 PM |
SB 65 |
| SB 65 Amendments HJUD (No Action Taken).pdf |
HJUD 5/17/2021 1:00:00 PM |
SB 65 |
| SB 122 v. B Amendment #2 HJUD Final Vote 5.17.2021.pdf |
HJUD 5/17/2021 1:00:00 PM |
SB 122 |