Legislature(2009 - 2010)BUTROVICH 205
03/13/2009 03:30 PM Senate RESOURCES
| Audio | Topic |
|---|---|
| Start | |
| SB121 | |
| SB31 | |
| SB58 | |
| Adjourn |
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
| + | SB 58 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | TELECONFERENCED | ||
| = | SB 121 | ||
| = | SB 31 | ||
SB 121-ENERGY EFFICIENCY BLDGS/PUBLIC WORKS
CO-CHAIR WIELECHOWSKI announced SB 121 to be up for
consideration.
3:36:01 PM
CO-CHAIR MCGUIRE moved to adopt work draft CSSB 121(RES),
labeled 26-LS0586\W. There was no objection and version W was
before the committee.
3:36:36 PM
SHELLY MORGAN, staff to Senator Wielechowski, explained that SB
121 will reduce the cost of operating state facilities by
reducing the amount of energy consumed by them over the next 15
years. It enables the state to lead by example in the arena of
energy efficiency and better position Alaska to receive federal
stimulus funding for the state Energy Program grants. By
prioritizing energy retro-fit projects and using performance
contracts, the state can begin saving energy right away.
She pointed out that performance contracts require no upfront
payments from the state. Performance contractors perform energy
audits for facilities and make whatever construction changes are
needed for the energy retro-fit. They are paid solely through
the energy savings the state accrues over time.
3:37:31 PM
SENATOR WAGONER joined the committee.
3:38:02 PM
MS. MORGAN said that these guaranteed savings are paid to the
energy service company for the retro-fit and within 15 years or
less cost savings from efficiency upgrades go directly to the
state - saving public funds.
She said the Department of Transportation and Public Facilities'
(DOTPF) first performance contract of only eight buildings
resulted in a savings of $365,991 based on 2006/07 rates, which
would be $557,096 based on 2008 rates. Within the first year the
savings from just these eight buildings could essentially cover
the annual staffing and travel requirements found in the DOTPF
fiscal note. If the state executed just 25 similar contracts, it
could save over $13 million based on 2008 rates in the first
year.
Two fiscal notes from DOTPF are for doing the work with
performance contracting - $363.600; the other shows the cost to
the state without performance contracting - over $17 million.
She said it is their intent that the committee adopt the fiscal
note based on doing performance contracting.
3:39:17 PM
MS. MORGAN went on to explain the six changes made to version P
dated 3/9/09 that are now found in version W. All the changes
were based on feedback from experts and committee members at the
March 9 hearing; all changes have been approved by the DOTPF and
the Alaska Energy Authority.
The first change is that the database be updated annually rather
than every 10 years. This can be done simply by having
individual building managers update data based on their utility
bills. Basically the individual responsible for paying the
utility bill for a facility could easily enter the utility data
into a spread sheet and once each year that data could be rolled
up into the rather than paying a DOTPF staff person to spend
hours compiling data on every facility.
The second change is that all facilities, not just heated
facilities, will be retrofitted and eligible for performance
contract retro-fit projects.
Third, the performance contracts may also include renewable
energy projects. "Alternative energy" was replaced with
"renewable energy" to better fit with the intent of this bill.
When determining the best energy efficiency measures for each
facility, the performance contractor may determine that it is
appropriate for a facility to generate its own energy using
renewable sources.
The fourth change is that the reference to the International
Energy Conservation Code (IECC) was removed. The bill now states
that facilities will be made to meet or exceed the most recently
published edition of the Illuminating Engineering Society of
North America (IESNA) standard 90.1 of the American Society of
Heating, Refrigerating and Air Conditioning Engineers (ASHRAE).
She explained that ASHRAE is more typically used for commercial
facilities and does a much better job of addressing Alaska's
climate conditions while still meeting the same basic guidelines
found in the IECC. The IECC identifies only three climate zones
which are insufficient for the entire state of Alaska.
MS. MORGAN said that fifth, the decision to postpone a retrofit
due to lack of cost-effectiveness was modified to add a
provision that this decision may be based in part on wither or
not the department would be able to meet a return on investment
within 15 years after project completion.
The sixth change is that the energy use index language found in
Sec. 44.83.955, was adjusted to better define the energy use
index and the database. The Alaska Energy Authority shall
establish an energy index to measure energy consumption, and the
database they prepare will be made up of energy use index data
for each facility.
She explained that these changes do not alter content, but just
provides clarity through definition.
3:43:38 PM
SENATOR STEDMAN remarked that the Railbelt Energy Fund language
allows buildings and facilities for energy conservation that are
state owned to be retrofitted, and asked how often the state has
used it and how that ties into the bill.
MS. MORGAN answered that starting in 2004 the DOTPF has done two
performance contracts totaling 16 buildings. Now there is no way
of prioritizing the retrofit. This bill not only allows for and
encourages the performance contracting, but establishes an
energy use database so that they can identify which buildings
are consuming the most energy so that the retrofit projects can
start with the most energy consuming first.
SENATOR STEDMAN added that the Railbelt Energy Fund allows
access to those funds for retrofitting state owned buildings and
facilities for energy conservation and it appears that the
Railbelt has most of the major state buildings. He was wondering
if that fund was every used for that purpose and how that policy
affected this bill.
CO-CHAIR WIELECHOWSKI said the capital in Juneau and any public
facilities outside of the Railbelt would not be included in the
Railbelt Energy Fund. This bill creates an energy use index,
which allows the state to prioritize what will be retrofitted
first.
He thought it better public policy and cheaper for the state to
undertake performance based contracting, because it doesn't cost
anything. The money you would save in paying for utilities would
pay for the upgrades.
3:47:11 PM
CO-CHAIR MCGUIRE moved to pass CSSB 121(RES), version W, from
committee with individual recommendations and attached fiscal
note(s). There was no objection and it was so ordered.
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|---|---|
| CS for SB 121 (Version W).pdf |
SRES 3/13/2009 3:30:00 PM |
SB 121 |
| CS for SB 121 (W) compared with (P).doc |
SRES 3/13/2009 3:30:00 PM |
SB 121 |
| SB 31 Bill Packet.pdf |
SRES 3/9/2009 3:30:00 PM SRES 3/13/2009 3:30:00 PM |
SB 31 |
| SB 121 Bill Packet.pdf |
SRES 3/9/2009 3:30:00 PM SRES 3/13/2009 3:30:00 PM |
SB 121 |
| SB 31 - Blank CS (Version D).pdf |
SRES 3/13/2009 3:30:00 PM |
SB 31 |
| SB 31 - Explanation of Changes (Version D).doc |
SRES 3/13/2009 3:30:00 PM |
SB 31 |
| SB 58 - Bill Packet.pdf |
SRES 3/13/2009 3:30:00 PM |
SB 58 |