Legislature(2025 - 2026)BELTZ 105 (TSBldg)
04/15/2025 03:30 PM Senate STATE AFFAIRS
Note: the audio
and video
recordings are distinct records and are obtained from different sources. As such there may be key differences between the two. The audio recordings are captured by our records offices as the official record of the meeting and will have more accurate timestamps. Use the icons to switch between them.
| Audio | Topic |
|---|---|
| Start | |
| SB34 | |
| SB120 | |
| SJR13 | |
| Adjourn |
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
| += | SB 34 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| += | SB 120 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| += | SB 116 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| += | SJR 13 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| += | SB 19 | TELECONFERENCED | |
SB 120-CLIMATE CHANGE COMMISSION
3:38:19 PM
CHAIR KAWASAKI reconvened the meeting and announced the
consideration of SENATE BILL NO. 120 "An Act establishing the
Alaska Climate Change Emergency Response Commission; and
relating to the powers and duties of the Alaska Climate Change
Emergency Response Commission."
This is the third hearing of SB 120, [CSSB version N was adopted
at the previous meeting.]
3:39:33 PM
DEIRDRE GOINS, Staff, Senator Gray-Jackson, Alaska State
Legislature, Juneau, Alaska, presented a brief recap of SB 120
and stated that Alaska is already experiencing serious climate
change impacts. SB 120 would establish a commission to
coordinate the state's response, secure federal resources, and
ensure communities, especially the most vulnerable, have a voice
in planning for the future.
3:40:49 PM
CHAIR KAWASAKI opened public testimony on SB 120.
3:41:09 PM
JULIA INGA, representing self, Palmer, Alaska, testified in
opposition to SB 120 and argued that SB 120 is unnecessary,
calling it an overreaching bureaucracy that would waste money,
burden communities with rules, and threaten vital industries
like oil, gas, and fishing. She stressed that Alaskans should
adapt to nature locally, invest in practical needs like
infrastructure and healthcare, and resist outside climate
mandates or agendas.
3:44:32 PM
ALISA COX, representing self, Delta Junction, Alaska, testified
in opposition to SB 120, and viewing it as a "money grab" and
fear-mongering tactic rather than a genuine climate solution.
She argued that Alaskans know how to adapt to natural weather
cycles, that local forests already capture carbon effectively,
and that outside interventions only waste money on unnecessary
programs. She emphasized that the state's real needs are
practical infrastructure improvements, not regulatory control
over residents or expensive climate initiatives.
3:48:04 PM
MELISSA SWOPE, representing self, Homer, Alaska, testified in
opposition to SB 120 and creating the Alaska Climate Change
Emergency Response Commission. She said the commission is
costly, intrusive, and unaccountable. She argued it would drain
millions from the treasury, add unnecessary bureaucracy, and
empower outside lobbyists and NGOs to impose harmful regulations
on Alaska's core industries. She urged investing in
infrastructure that directly benefits Alaskans and focusing on
practical, locally driven solutions that honor the state's
history and values.
3:50:52 PM
ED MARSHALL, representing self, Soldotna, Alaska, testified in
opposition to SB 120, criticizing the Alaska legislature for
overreach, corruption, and poor priorities. He said the
legislature has cited unchecked union funding, renewable energy
mandates, red flag laws, and other controversial actions. He
accused lawmakers of arrogance, ignoring voter decisions, and
mismanaging issues like climate policy, while expressing
frustration and urging voters to hold legislators accountable in
the next election.
3:53:33 PM
WAYNE WOODS, representing self, Palmer, Alaska, testified in
opposition to SB 120 arguing that the commission's powers are
overly broad and primarily benefit the green energy and climate-
change industry at Alaska's expense. He warned it could harm the
state's economy and allow undue influence from international
nonprofits, calling for lawmakers in Juneau to focus.
3:56:42 PM
KEN GRIFFIN, representing self, Wasilla, Alaska, testified in
opposition to SB 120 and calling it an overreach that strips
citizen sovereignty, wastes money on unnecessary commissions,
and fails to address real economic challenges. He warned it will
worsen Alaska's affordability crisis, drive residents away, and
accuse lawmakers of mismanaging priorities while failing to
protect the people's rights.
3:59:25 PM
KEN HUCKEBA, representing self, Wasilla, Alaska, testified in
opposition to SB 120 arguing that the bill empowers Non-
Government Organizations (NGOs) and special interests at the
expense of individual sovereignty and Alaska's representative
government. He criticized additional commissions, mandates, and
regulations as burdensome, economically harmful, and unsupported
by measurable outcomes, calling the legislation an offense to
common sense.
4:02:07 PM
MIKE COONS, representing self, Wasilla, Alaska, testified in
opposition to SB 120 criticizing the bill as an unnecessary and
costly commission driven by "climate change hysteria" and
compares it to policies in states he views as overly socialist.
He argued climate predictions have been exaggerated; Alaska's
budget is already in deficit. He said the legislature should
focus on constitutional responsibilities like balancing the
budget and protecting the Permanent Fund Dividend rather than
creating more bureaucracy.
4:05:49 PM
CASSIE ANDREWS, representing self, Anchorage, Alaska, testified
in opposition to SB 120 and argued that the commission is less
about protecting the environment and more about giving NGOs and
climate activists a taxpayer-funded platform. She stressed
Alaska's emissions are negligible globally, yet the state is
unfairly targeted. Even with local members, the commission would
be influenced by outside money and mandates. She asked instead
for practical, common-sense adaptation rather than climate
alarmism.
[CHAIR KAWASAKI closed public testimony on SB 120.]
4:07:17 PM
CHAIR KAWASAKI solicited the will of the committee.
4:07:25 PM
At ease.
4:07:33 PM
CHAIR KAWASAKI reconvened the meeting.
4:07:38 PM
SENATOR GRAY-JACKSON moved to report CSSB 120, work order 34-
LS0073\N, from committee with individual recommendations and
attached fiscal note(s).
4:07:53 PM
CHAIR KAWASAKI found no objection and CSSB 120(STA) was reported
from the Senate State Affairs Standing Committee.
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|---|---|
| SB 62 Support parole reform AP_Redacted.pdf |
SSTA 4/15/2025 3:30:00 PM |
SB 62 |
| SB 62 Support parole reform JY_Redacted.pdf |
SSTA 4/15/2025 3:30:00 PM |
SB 62 |
| SB 62 Support parole reform_Redacted RG.pdf |
SSTA 4/15/2025 3:30:00 PM |
SB 62 |
| SJR 13 Opposition LH_Redacted.pdf |
SSTA 4/15/2025 3:30:00 PM |
SJR 13 |
| JNPA opposition to SJR13 letter.pdf |
SSTA 4/15/2025 3:30:00 PM |
SJR 13 |
| SJR15 TW.pdf |
SSTA 4/15/2025 3:30:00 PM |
SJR 15 |
| Opposition to SJR 13 DL.pdf |
SSTA 4/15/2025 3:30:00 PM |
SJR 13 |
| Trust Responses to S&H STA Committee Questions 2025 4.11.25.pdf |
SSTA 4/15/2025 3:30:00 PM |
AMHTA presentation |
| SJR 13 Opposition LH.pdf |
SSTA 4/15/2025 3:30:00 PM |
SJR 13 |
| SJR 13 Opposition FT_Redacted.pdf |
SSTA 4/15/2025 3:30:00 PM |
SJR 13 |
| SJR 13 opposition WC.pdf |
SSTA 4/15/2025 3:30:00 PM |
SJR 13 |
| Support of Senate Bill 19 DA.pdf |
SSTA 4/15/2025 3:30:00 PM |
SB 19 |
| Support of Senate Bill 19 KM_Redacted.pdf |
SSTA 4/15/2025 3:30:00 PM |
SB 62 |
| LWVAK supports SB 116.pdf |
SSTA 4/15/2025 3:30:00 PM |
SB 116 |
| Climate Hoax SB 120 Oppose.pdf |
SSTA 4/15/2025 3:30:00 PM |
SB 120 |
| SJR 13-3.pdf |
SSTA 4/15/2025 3:30:00 PM |
SJR 13 |
| SJR 13 Fiscal Note.pdf |
SSTA 4/15/2025 3:30:00 PM |
SJR 13 |