Legislature(2011 - 2012)SENATE FINANCE 532
02/01/2012 09:00 AM Senate FINANCE
| Audio | Topic |
|---|---|
| Start | |
| SB119 | |
| SB38 | |
| SB83 | |
| SB115 | |
| Adjourn |
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
| + | SB 119 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | SB 38 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | SB 83 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | SB 115 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | TELECONFERENCED |
SENATE BILL NO. 119
"An Act relating to the licensing and regulation of
athletic trainers."
9:01:37 AM
SENATOR KEVIN MEYER, introduced SB 119. He explained that
athletic trainers were certified, health care professionals
who practice in the field of sports medicine. The
profession played a significant role in the management,
prevention, recognition and rehabilitation of injured
athletes under the supervision of a license physician. As
people became increasingly more active, athletic trainers
were a vital resource in administering immediate emergency
care as well as injury prevention and treatment.
BRENDA SHELDON, PRESIDENT, ALASKA ATHLETIC TRAINERS
ASSOCIATION, spoke in support of SB 119. She noted that
Alaska was one of three states that did not license
athletic trainers. She explained that athletic trainer
clients ranged from athletes to industrial workers. She
noted that athletic trainers were often the first to
respond in the cases of injuries.
Ms. Sheldon explained that SB 119 would require everyone in
Alaska who considered themselves athletic trainers to be
licensed. She explained that she was an athletic trainer,
and shared her personal feelings about the importance of SB
119.
9:07:06 AM
CHRISTOPHER DEAN, ATHLETIC TRAINER, testified in support of
SB 119. He explained that SB 119 would ensure quality
medical care for the athletes in Alaska. He stressed that
some parents had become dependent on athletic trainers.
Co-Chair Stedman noted the new fiscal impact note from
Department of Commerce, Community and Economic Development,
and a new zero fiscal note from the Department of
Administration.
Senator Thomas wondered if the initial licensing fee of
$900 would be covered in the bill. Senator Meyer replied
that the $900 could possibly be covered by the state. He
hoped to discuss reasons why the licensing was so high.
Senator Thomas agreed that the fee was very high.
DON HABEGER, DIRECTOR, CORPORATIONS, BUSINESS, AND
PROFESSIONAL LICENSING, explained that the licensing fee
was high, because it was expensive to install a program
into the system. He stressed that once the system was
implemented, the program would be complete with application
accessibility. He stated that there was a belief that the
program could easily get absorbed into the existing staff.
9:14:49 AM
Senator Thomas wondered if the cost was high because there
were a small number of individuals who were interested in
applying. He felt it could be a simple implementation. Mr.
Habeger replied that it was a statutory requirement to
charge the user fees in implementation. He stressed that
the fee was legitimate.
Senator Thomas wondered how many people were anticipated to
be licensed. Mr. Habeger replied that there was no way he
could predict that number, but relied on the Athletic
Trainer Association to provide that number.
Senator Olson wondered if there was a licensing board that
would have a small number of licensees. Mr. Habeger noted
that a similar program was the Midwife Board, and their
biennial program fee was about $2000.
Senator Olson wondered if there was a process to pay for
the investigator to deal with the complaint. Mr. Habeger
noted that there were recent discussions regarding the Real
Estate Commission, and those costs could spike.
Senator McGuire wondered how the school districts would
intersect into the program. She wondered if the costs would
be passed on to the school district. Senator Meyer deferred
to a school district employee.
Senator McGuire restated that she was concerned with the
costs for the school districts. Mr. Dean replied that
currently no school district in Alaska employed athletic
trainers. He stressed that the school districts in
Fairbanks were highly dependent on benefactors.
9:21:44 AM
Mr. Dean noted that midwives had a board, but the athletic
trainers do not have a board. He felt that athletic
trainers could be better compared with nutritionists.
Senator Egan wondered if the fees would increase if there
was an investigation regarding licensing issues. Mr.
Habeger replied that the division had an investigative unit
that was responsible for any violation of Title A. If
investigators determined that there was a violation, then a
process occurred with the possibility for many different
outcomes. He stressed that most of the time there were low
cost issues, but if there was a legal process then the
Department of Law would be involved.
Senator Egan wondered if there would be background checks
for people that applied for licenses. Mr. Habeger replied
that if the applicant remained current with the national
organization, then the applicant would be eligible for a
state license.
9:27:07 AM
Senator Olson noted that Mr. Dean had declared that
athletic trainers were more like nutritionists than
midwives, and wondered if Mr. Habeger agreed with that
assumption. Mr. Habeger did not know the specifics of the
Nutritionist program. He noted that Naturopaths had a fee
of $400, and did not have a board.
Senator Olson wondered what penalties would be incurred if
the license were suspended. Senator Meyer replied that the
licensees were overseen by the National Board.
Senator Olson noted that there was an issue of diagnosing
and treatment. He expressed concern that athletic trainers
were not authorized to practice medicine. Senator Meyer
stressed that there were specific requirements for people
that call themselves athletic trainers. He also stressed
that they were not going to practice medicine. He stated
that he did not know how the bill would apply to rural
areas, but agreed to provide that information.
SB 119 was HEARD and HELD in committee for further
consideration.
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|---|---|
| SB 119 Athletic Training Educational Overview.pdf |
SFIN 2/1/2012 9:00:00 AM |
SB 119 |
| SB 119 Sponsor Statement.pdf |
SFIN 2/1/2012 9:00:00 AM |
SB 119 |
| SB 119 Ltr of Supt AATA.pdf |
SFIN 2/1/2012 9:00:00 AM |
SB 119 |
| SB 119 Support Letters 24.pdf |
SFIN 2/1/2012 9:00:00 AM |
SB 119 |
| SB 119 Other States Chart Comparison.pdf |
SFIN 2/1/2012 9:00:00 AM |
SB 119 |
| SB 119 US Bureau of Labor Statistics Athletic Trainers.pdf |
SFIN 2/1/2012 9:00:00 AM |
SB 119 |
| SB 38 BuckConsultants Analysis.pdf |
SFIN 2/1/2012 9:00:00 AM |
SB 38 |
| SB 38 Sectional.pdf |
SFIN 2/1/2012 9:00:00 AM |
SB 38 |
| SB 38 Sponsor Statement v.A.pdf |
SFIN 2/1/2012 9:00:00 AM |
SB 38 |
| SB 38 Support Ltr AK Prof Fire Fighters.pdf |
SFIN 2/1/2012 9:00:00 AM |
SB 38 |
| SB 38 Support Ltr APDEA.pdf |
SFIN 2/1/2012 9:00:00 AM |
SB 38 |
| SB 38 Support Ltr PSEA.pdf |
SFIN 2/1/2012 9:00:00 AM |
SB 38 |
| SB 83 sponsor statement Letterhead.docx |
SFIN 2/1/2012 9:00:00 AM |
SB 83 |
| SB 83 support documents.pdf |
SFIN 2/1/2012 9:00:00 AM |
SB 83 |
| SB 83 State_Profile_2011_AK.pdf |
SFIN 2/1/2012 9:00:00 AM |
SB 83 |
| SB 115 lttr supporting, ATT.pdf |
SFIN 2/1/2012 9:00:00 AM |
SB 115 |
| SB 115 Sponsor Statement.pdf |
SFIN 2/1/2012 9:00:00 AM |
SB 115 |
| SB 115 lttr supporting, Liberty Mutual.pdf |
SFIN 2/1/2012 9:00:00 AM |
SB 115 |
| SB 115 Sectional Analysis.pdf |
SFIN 2/1/2012 9:00:00 AM |
SB 115 |
| SB 119 CBPL Memo Final.pdf |
SFIN 2/1/2012 9:00:00 AM |
SB 119 |