Legislature(2021 - 2022)BELTZ 105 (TSBldg)
05/13/2021 01:30 PM Senate TRANSPORTATION
Note: the audio
and video
recordings are distinct records and are obtained from different sources. As such there may be key differences between the two. The audio recordings are captured by our records offices as the official record of the meeting and will have more accurate timestamps. Use the icons to switch between them.
| Audio | Topic |
|---|---|
| Start | |
| HB63 | |
| SB117 | |
| HB34 | |
| Adjourn |
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
| + | SB 117 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | HB 34 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | TELECONFERENCED | ||
| += | HB 63 | TELECONFERENCED | |
SB 117-PROCUREMENT; CONSTRUCTION; CONTRACTS
2:10:39 PM
CHAIR MYERS announced the consideration of SENATE BILL NO. 117
"An Act relating to the state procurement code; establishing the
construction manager general contractor procurement method; and
providing for an effective date."
2:10:50 PM
ANDY MILLS, Special Assistant to the Commissioner; Legislative
Liaison, Department of Transportation and Public Facilities
(DOTPF), Juneau, Alaska, on behalf of the administration, stated
that SB 117 was in response to the department's desire to work
directly with the contracting community. SB 117 would amend AS
36.30, the state's procurement code, by codifying the
department's current use of the CM/GC or construct
manager/general contractor contracting method. He explained that
the CM/GC method would provide a two-phase contract for both a
project's preconstruction and construction phases. Although this
method was not an option under current procurement law for
competitive sealed bidding, the department has used the CM/GC
contracting methodology under the state's existing innovative
procurement statute for over fifteen years. He recalled that
this process was used on over 20 complex projects. He said that
CM/GC is included in Federal Highway Administrative regulations,
in other states' regulations, and is a common and accepted
practice in the construction industry. In the department's
experience, CM/GC contracts could decrease contractor change
orders, administrative delays and leverage department resources.
2:12:33 PM
MR. MILLS said this process could allow the department and its
contractors to improve Alaska's transportation infrastructure
faster, which is its mission. Once the CM/CG contracting method
is adopted in statute, the department would collaborate with the
Associated General Contractors of Alaska (AGC) and other
stakeholders to adopt regulations, policy and guidance
materials, further refining this innovative contracting method
for use in Alaska.
2:13:23 PM
ALICIA SIIRA, Executive Director, Associated General Contractors
of Alaska (AGC), Anchorage, Alaska, stated that AGC supports
having the CM/CG tool as an alternative project delivery for
DOTPF. She stated that AGC is a statewide construction trade
association representing contractors, specialty contractors,
suppliers and manufacturers in Alaska. AGC unites the
construction industry to focus on balance and work to foster
constructive legislation, regulation and standards. As
previously stated, CM/CG has been used in Alaska for more than a
decade. SB 117 will benefit the construction industry by
modifying procurement statutes to codify the CM/CG procurement
process, she said. It would allow DOTPF to use the process
without submitting an innovative procurement request to the
Department of Law and the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA)
for each project. This will modernize, clarify and improve the
state's procurement process and align Alaska with the majority
of other states.
2:14:53 PM
MS. SIIRA said SB 117 would allow DOTPF to add clarity and
consistency for CM/CG use across all regions, which is a
priority for the construction industry. She stated that the
passage of this bill would also provide an opportunity for the
industry to participate in the development of regulations that
would remedy concerns about consistency in CM/CG projects. In
closing, she said AGC supports this bill and looks forward to
being included in further enhancing the CM/CG process.
2:15:48 PM
SENATOR KIEHL asked how broadly this process would be used. He
related his understanding that it was not appropriate to use
this process in lots of projects.
MR. MILLS agreed with Senator Kiehl. He stated that low-bid
process was predominately used by the department for
administrative ease. Given the nature of many DOTPF projects, he
said it wasn't necessary to use CM/GC to add efficiency or
complete the process.
2:17:10 PM
CHARLIE DEININGER, Chief Procurement Officer, Department of
Transportation and Public Facilities (DOTPF), Juneau, Alaska,
responded that DOTPF has typically used CM/GC on one to three of
the 100 to 120 total DOTPF projects per year. He explained that
the department would develop criteria in regulation for CM/CG
contracting. Further, it would require the commissioner's
approval to use the CM/CG process.
2:18:48 PM
SENATOR SHOWER stated that this bill was previously heard in the
State Affairs Committee, which he chairs, so he was familiar
with it. He pointed out that the administration made it clear
that the department would work with smaller contractors on the
process. He suggested that the committee consider a small
amendment to require the administration to conduct outreach to
inform contractors about this process and provide them with any
assistance needed. He acknowledged that CM/CG would generally be
limited to larger, more complex projects.
2:20:32 PM
SENATOR KIEHL recalled slides during a presentation discussed
using an independent cost estimator. He characterized it as an
essential part of the process but he did not see any provision
for an independent cost estimator in the bill.
MR. MILLS related his understanding that many aspects would be
included in regulations for CM/CG. He assured members that the
independent cost estimator would be part of the process.
SENATOR KIEHL said the independent cost estimator was a critical
safeguard for the owner so he wants to be sure it is addressed.
2:22:30 PM
CHAIR MYERS opened public testimony on SB 117.
2:22:51 PM
SARAH LEFEBVRE, Office Manager/Contract Administrator, Exclusive
Paving, Fairbanks, Alaska, spoke in support of SB 117. She
provided her background, such that she has worked in the
construction industry for over 20 years. She said she agreed
with AGC's testimony.
MS. LEFEBVRE spoke to her experience with the CM/CG process. She
said that each proposal is different depending on whether best
practices are incorporated into the proposal. From a
contractor's perspective, she expected that the largest CM/CG
project her company was involved in would provide the best
experience. However, that was not the case. She predicted that
the inconsistencies and flaws within the process would continue
unless legislation were passed. Other than the state's steps to
obtain the authority to use the CM/CG procurement method, the
state does not have any defined processes. She said CM/CG was
being used as a procurement concept. After that, how it was used
depended on the specific DOTPF staff involved. Comparing the
CM/CG projects from 2012 to 2021, the results would show the
process varied widely and the sequence of changes did not track
for developing or implementing best practices. Placing CM/CG in
statute would create a pathway to develop regulations and clear
guidelines to define the process and ensure that the best value
was indeed being described and sought on behalf of the state.
She said this is crucial to achieving the best competitive
environment.
MS. LEFEBVRE explained that contractors must make significant
investments for CM/CG projects. In her experience, the internal
costs ranged from $30,000 to $100,000 for her company to
participate in the process. She suggested that the small
business amendment would be better addressed by regulation. In
closing, she urged members not to delay passing SB 117 for
another year. With forthcoming federal funds state
infrastructure projects will increase, she said. The CM/CG's
procurement method will provide an opportunity for the state to
ensure that Alaska can maximize the opportunities to use federal
funding. She cautioned that it may take a year to complete the
regulation process after passage of SB 117. She said the
construction industry is prepared to actively participate in
drafting regulations to ensure that Alaska is a sound platform
to build future CM/CG Request for Proposals (RFPs).
2:25:45 PM
CHAIR MYERS, after first determining no one wished to testify,
closed public testimony on SB 117.
2:26:00 PM
SENATOR SHOWER offered to work with the Chair on an amendment
for small businesses.
2:27:02 PM
SENATOR MICCICHE stated his desire for SB 117 to pass this year.
SENATOR SHOWER offered to make a conceptual amendment.
MR. MILLS interjected that an amendment was not necessary for
public outreach. He offered to commit to initiating a public
information campaign. Further, he said he had already discussed
with Mr. Deininger ways to supplement the process to better
inform contractors.
SENATOR SHOWER indicated that he was comfortable with Mr. Mill's
commitment.
CHAIR MYERS informed members that HB 160, the companion bill
passed the house. He wondered about the process for the
companion bill.
SENATOR MICCICHE explained that if SB 117 were to pass, it would
meet up with HB 160 in Senate Rules. He expressed concern about
any potential delays by holding SB 117 in committee.
CHAIR MYERS said he was comfortable moving SB 117.
SENATOR SHOWER stated that he was comfortable moving SB 117.
2:30:41 PM
At ease
2:31:15 PM
CHAIR MYERS reconvened the meeting.
2:31:23 PM
SENATOR SHOWER moved to report SB 117, work order 32-GS1579\A
from committee with individual recommendations and attached
fiscal note(s).
CHAIR MEYERS found no objection and SB 117 was reported from the
Senate Transportation Standing Committee.
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|---|---|
| HB34 Sponsor Statement 2.25.2021.pdf |
STRA 5/13/2021 1:30:00 PM |
HB 34 |
| HB34 Bridge Images 2.7.2020.pdf |
STRA 5/13/2021 1:30:00 PM |
HB 34 |
| HB34 Additional Info - Vietnam Helicopter Memorial - Time Magazine 2.7.2020.pdf |
STRA 5/13/2021 1:30:00 PM |
HB 34 |
| HB34 Additional Info - VHPA Honored 2.7.2020.pdf |
STRA 5/13/2021 1:30:00 PM |
HB 34 |
| HB34 Additional Info - Helicopters in Vietnam 2.7.2020.pdf |
STRA 5/13/2021 1:30:00 PM |
HB 34 |
| HB34 Additional Info - Air & Space Magazine Article 2.7.2020.pdf |
STRA 5/13/2021 1:30:00 PM |
HB 34 |
| HB34 Additional Info - VHPA Website 2.7.2020.pdf |
STRA 5/13/2021 1:30:00 PM |
HB 34 |
| SB 117 Sponsor Statement.pdf |
STRA 5/13/2021 1:30:00 PM |
SB 117 |
| SB 117 Sectional Analysis 3.31.2021.pdf |
STRA 5/13/2021 1:30:00 PM |
SB 117 |
| CMGC Award Process - Flow Chart STEP 2.pdf |
STRA 5/13/2021 1:30:00 PM |
SB 117 |
| CMGC Award Process - Flow Chart STEP 1.pdf |
STRA 5/13/2021 1:30:00 PM |
SB 117 |