Legislature(2003 - 2004)
05/17/2003 10:38 AM House FIN
| Audio | Topic |
|---|
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
CS FOR SENATE BILL NO. 117(FIN)
"An Act relating to the longevity bonus program; and
providing for an effective date."
JOHN VOWELL, DIRECTOR, LONGEVITY BONUS PROGRAMS, DEPARTMENT
OF ADMINISTRATION provided information on the bill.
Beginning in 2004, the bill would reduce the longevity bonus
by 20 percent each year until 2007, until it is eliminated
(2008).
MARIE DARLIN, AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF RETIRED PERSONS
(AARP), JUNEAU TESTIFIED provided information regarding the
legislation. She stated that she is a third generation
Juneau resident and pointed out the Alaskan seniors provide
support to the state's economy. She noted that the Pioneer's
of Alaska worked on the current version of the bill. She
stated that their preference was to have the program
continue, but noted that Section 6 was a proposal arrived at
to give people an opportunity to plan for the consequences
of an elimination of the longevity bonus program. She noted
that the bill provides for adult public assistance as
proposed. She stated that if the bill were the best that
could be provided for the seniors of Alaska, they would
support it. She stressed the need for "safety nets" to help
seniors meet their needs. She emphasized that most seniors
did not foresee a way to meet their needs, particularly in
the medical area. She stated the $250 per month for seniors
85 years old or older made a major impact. She concluded
that this was a proposal at the request of the Governor's
office, and that they awaited a response.
CHIP WAGONER, PIONEERS OF ALASKA, testified about the
proposed compromise devised by Pioneers and AARP in response
to the Governor's original elimination of the longevity
bonus program. He noted that the program was being
eliminated 24 years earlier than projected. He commended
these organizations for taking all state programs into
account in crafting a proposal to provide a "soft landing"
for seniors. He stated that to immediately eliminate the
program would be cruel to seniors. He stated that the
average age of a recipient was 78 years old. He stated that
the basing the program on assets was not adequate, since
seniors faced a variety of medical expenses not related to
their income. They do not support a needs based program.
Co-Chair Harris spoke to the history and origination of the
program, and its natural phasing out. He asked what services
are not provided in Alaska that are provided to seniors in
other states. Ms. Darlin referred to public assistance
programs, property tax assistance provided to seniors in
other states.
Co-Chair Williams referred to potential changes and stated
that that the Administration was not supportive of a five-
year phase out. He observed that the Governor might agree to
a two-year phase out. He stated that the Committee would
likely pass [a five year phase out], with the knowledge that
the Governor may ultimately zero the program out of the
budget.
Co-Chair Williams clarified that a two-year phase out would
reduce payments by 50 percent ($22 million), and then cease
payments in the following year. He stated that the payments
would continue at some level for FY 04 and FY 05. He
reiterated that the Governor would support a two-year phase
out.
LENORE JONESS, KENAI, testified via teleconference in
opposition to the legislation. She noted that the program
could be funded from the tax break that the Governor has
proposed for the oil industry. She also opposed changing to
a needs based program. She questioned the legislature's
concern for seniors in this regard and also in terms of the
sales tax. She maintained that the State was taking
advantage of seniors since they did not generate income.
She noted that senior retirement income and medical payments
had an impact on the state's economy. She referred to a
study [not cited], which concluded that Alaska seniors are
one of the largest single sources of money flowing into the
state. Senior retirement income and medical payments have a
significant beneficial effect on the state's economy. At the
same time more than half of Alaskan seniors live vicariously
on the edge of solvency. For some, financial considerations
may determine whether they continue to reside in the state.
For many others, a combination of financial benefits
available from state and municipal government is critical to
their wellbeing. Seniors also provide the equivalent of
2,400 full time jobs as volunteers, worth approximately $60
million a year. Seniors over 60 provide unpaid care giving
services that are the equivalent of 6,300 full time jobs.
Seniors over 60 make up 8 percent of the state's population.
Seniors are estimated to make up 20 percent of the state's
population by 2025.
CSSB 117 (FIN) HELD in Committee for further consideration.
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|