Legislature(2009 - 2010)HOUSE FINANCE 519
04/18/2009 08:30 AM House FINANCE
| Audio | Topic |
|---|---|
| Start | |
| SB116 | |
| SB125 | |
| HB36 | |
| HB157 | |
| SB72 | |
| Adjourn |
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
| + | SB 116 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | SB 125 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | HB 36 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | SB 72 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | HB 157 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | TELECONFERENCED |
CS FOR SENATE BILL NO. 116(FIN)
"An Act making a special appropriation for energy
assistance for Alaska residents; and providing for an
effective date."
8:47:24 AM
JAY LIVEY, STAFF, SENATOR LYMAN HOFFMAN, stated that SB 116
required a one-time appropriation of $9 million to assist
Alaskans in paying for energy costs. Although the amount of
fuel was abundant, the cost of fuel has forced families to
make difficult budgetary choices, and has been compounded
by lower than average yearly incomes. In 1990, fuel costs
in Bethel were 45 percent higher than fuel costs in
Anchorage, by 2007, the differential was 92 percent. The
one-time appropriation would be divided between the Low
Income Home Energy Assistance Program (LIHEAP), and the
Alaska Heating Assistance Program (AKHAP). Both programs
provide state-wide assistance. Approximately 162
communities are served. Communities with recipients
include; Anchorage, Palmer, Wasilla, North Pole and Homer.
He added that some areas of rural Alaska are served by
tribal programs as well.
Mr. Livey detailed the criteria set out for residents to
establish enough points to qualify for assistance under the
two programs. The applicant must be a state resident and
must live in the home in which the heating costs occur. Set
income guidelines must also be met. Each applicant would be
assigned a number of points based on the climate in the
area in which they live, which would be assessed by degree
days in the area. The number of disabled and elderly in the
household would also be considered. The requirements
determine that the assistance would be rewarded to those
with the highest need. In addition, the assistance money,
determined by the application points, would be distributed
directly to the vendor and not the individual applicant.
8:52:27 AM
Mr. Livey noted that The Department of Health and Social
Services (DHSS) would initiate a final check run in April
of 2009. This would allow enough time for the appropriated
funds to become available to those with established vendor
accounts, or who become eligible before April 2009. This
would assist families with fuel debts from the winter of
2009 in paying existing debts and continue to afford heat
through the spring.
Mr. Livey furthered that based on the amount of federal and
state funds DHSS had to spend on heating assistance, he
could calculate that $220 was spent per applicant point.
The average number of points is 15, which equals $3300 for
heating assistance in 2009. If the resident pays $6.50 per
gallon for 84 gallons per month, or 507 gallons total
during the winter months, and uses 150 gallons per month,
the existing program will only pay 56 percent of the
heating need. He thought that the additional assistance was
not extravagance for the state.
8:55:37 AM
Representative Fairclough wondered if one household could
receive assistance from both LIHEAP and AKHAP
simultaneously. Mr. Livey replied that it would depend on
the family's income. The qualification would be based on
the federal poverty level. He added that AKHAP was funded
through general state funds and LIHEAP was funded
federally.
Representative Fairclough requested further clarification.
Mr. Livey explained that the funding for LIHEAP cannot be
used to fund AKHAP, but the funds for AKHAP can be used for
LIHEAP. If a family of four earns under $40,000 per year,
funding may be combined from both programs, but would be
distributed under LIHEAP. If the family's income exceeds
$40,000, general funds must be used under AKHAP.
Representative Fairclough asked how many families under
each program receive combined funds. Mr. Livey guessed that
13,000 families in the state are served by both programs;
90 percent of the families are under the poverty line.
8:58:22 AM
Representative Joule queried what percentage of a family's
available income, throughout the state, is spent on energy
costs. Mr. Livey replied that he did not have the exact
percentages. He believed that the percentages were
significantly higher in rural Alaska.
Representative Joule thought that the elderly and disabled
should be the first to qualify for assistance. He told
story of two elderly people who needed assistance but did
not qualify for AKHAP. He worried that the funds were not
going to those who needed the assistance most. He wondered
if the point system could be negatively manipulated.
9:01:36 AM
Mr. Livey responded that the program used to assign points
has a component that provides extra points to the elderly
and disabled. He added that income does factor into the
determination of points.
Representative Joule asked about CITGO, which provides fuel
assistance to Alaska Native families. He wondered how long
the program had been in effect, what was the cost, and who
was eligible. Mr. Livey understood that CITGO had provided
some fuel to a few communities in 2008, and was expected to
again in May 2009. Through regional corporations, some
communities had accepted the fuel, some did not.
Representative Joule asked if the cost of the program was
known. Mr. Livey replied no.
Representative Crawford questioned the ratio of federal to
state dollars for the individuals under the federal poverty
level. Mr. Livey explained that the money is melded and a
dollar value is assigned per point. A family under $40,000
would receive one dollar, which would be combination of
both federal and state money, per point. A family above
$40,000 per year would receive only state money.
9:05:02 AM
Representative Crawford asked for further clarification on
the ratio of melded state and federal funds. Mr. Livey
thought that the ratio was 2/3 federal dollars and 1/3
state dollars.
Vice-Chair Thomas asked if two families, living together in
one household, could qualify for assistance. Mr. Livey
understood that one application was allowed per house.
Vice-Chair Thomas said that when AGIA was moved out of
committee in 2007, intent language had been written into
the bill that would have allocated $60,000 per year into
LIHEAP. The Senate Finance Committee removed the intent
language. He felt that that action may be connected to the
funding problems the programs currently face.
RON KREHER, CHIEF OF FIELD SERVICES, DIVISION OF PUBLIC
ASSISTANCE, DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND SOCIAL SERVICES,
explained that families below 150 percent of poverty
receive 100 percent federal funds, and families above
receive 100 percent state funds. The appropriation of $10
million for FY 2008, stipulated that the funds be used for
heating assistance programs. At the end of the program year
the department examines the number of households served by
the programs. Surplus funds are used as supplemental
payments. The $10 million would be spread out between
LIHEAP recipients and AKHAP recipients. The amount of state
versus federal funds distributed would depend on where
families fell on the poverty line.
Representative Joule proposed that the department
manipulate the point system to ensure assistance to the
elderly and the disabled.
9:10:14 AM
Mr. Kreher felt that manipulation of the point system would
require regulatory changes. With the creation of AKHAP, and
the pushing up of income limits to 225 percent of poverty,
any household that is income ineligible for the program has
an income in excess of the limited amount. The income
qualifications do not currently take into consideration how
the income budgeted. He thought that the number of
households at the higher end of the income bracket may be
dropping of in assistance use because their gross income
exceeds the limits set forth by the program. The program
also requires seasonal incomes to be annualized, which can
put a family above the income limit.
Representative Joule stated his support for the provision,
but reiterated concerns regarding people in need who are
denied assistance. Mr. Kreher replied that the department
would work with the legislature to remedy the concerns
regarding elderly and disabled persons with need.
Representative Joule expressed excitement for the
collaborative effort.
9:14:37 AM
Representative Gara asked if federal portion of the LIHEAP
program was funded at $10 million. Mr. Kreher replied that
the program received $22 million in federal funds,
including emergency contingency funds, and an increased
black grant amount.
Representative Gara asked if the federal portion would be
closer to $10 million, in a year without a federal stimulus
package. Mr. Kreher replied yes.
Representative Gara asked how many LIHEAP applications were
filed each year. Mr. Kreher shared that 2008 had been
unusual, with 37 percent more applications filed than in
previous years. This was because of the poor economy, but
also marketing efforts by the department. Of the 9,000
applications that have been processed, the majority are
well below poverty level.
Representative Gara asked how many applications the
department expected to receive by the end of 2009. Mr.
Kreher thought it could be 16,000.
Representative Gara asked how much assistance each
applicant would receive. Mr. Kreher answered that in rural
Alaska the average household received $4,000. A very low
income household in an urban setting received $900.
9:17:53 AM
Representative Salmon commented on the 15 point system. He
wondered if 15 points was the maximum amount of points that
could be received. Mr. Kreher answered that the maximum
number of points that could be received was 32, the minimum
was 2.
Representative Salmon what were the qualifications that
would earn the applicant 15 points. Mr. Kreher said that
the points were based on community heating points,
calculated based on location and heating degree days. For
example, heating points for Willow is 7; there are
additional points for children, elderly, and disabled. The
factor is also based on housing type, such as size. Where a
family falls in the poverty income brackets also determines
the percentage of points.
Representative Salmon asked if there were points given
based on distance from urban centers. Mr. Kreher said that
the points were based on heating degree days and where the
community is located, including being on the road system.
Representative Kelly wondered how the effective date ending
FY 2009 related to FY 2008.
Mr. Livey understood that the bill would provide a one-time
appropriation to fund the department's last check run of FY
2009. The money would be obligated by June 30, 2009.
Representative Kelly asked how much state funding had been
given to the program in 2008. Mr. Livey replied $10
million.
9:22:21 AM
BOB CHARLES, ASSOCIATION OF VILLAGE COUNCIL PRESIDENTS
testified via teleconference, spoke in support of the
legislation.
Representative Kelly expressed frustration with the bill.
He opined that there had been significant discussion about
the one-time nature of past appropriations. He considered
it an entitlement that would be expected in perpetuity. He
understood the need, but was upset about provisions that
purport to be one-time. He thought federal funding should
only be used to help the truly needy. He cited statistics
around the state regarding use of state and federal funds.
9:28:28 AM
Representative Salmon pointed out to the committee that
state funds have been made available to urban areas for
energy assistance in the past. He felt that the rural areas
of the state had been treated unfairly. He felt that a
long-term solution had been established in urban areas and
he wanted the same solutions for rural areas.
Representative Gara recognized that the Healy coal plant
had been heavily subsidized over the years. He surmised
that the reason there was no road money in rural areas was
because there are no roads. He emphasized that the
assistance funds that were distributed in rural Alaska were
necessary, not extravagant, and should not be limited to a
one-time commitment. He stated that he did not vote for a
one-time commitment.
9:32:37 AM
Representative Kelly countered that Fairbanks does not have
a hydro plant. He maintained his position on the
legislation.
Co-Chair Stoltze MOVED to report CS SB 116(FIN) out of
Committee with individual recommendations and the
accompanying fiscal note. There being NO OBJECTION, it was
so ordered.
CS SB 116(FIN) was REPORTED out of Committee with a "do
pass" recommendation.
9:33:39 AM RECESSED
9:47:15 AM RECONVENED
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|---|---|
| 02__Sponsor_Statement_HB157_Exempt_13Mar09[1].doc |
HFIN 4/18/2009 8:30:00 AM |
HB 157 |
| 03__HB_157_-_legislative-report-on-retiree-return-program-2-6-09.pdf |
HFIN 4/18/2009 8:30:00 AM |
HB 157 |
| HB036-OOG-LtGOV-4-17-09.pdf |
HFIN 4/18/2009 8:30:00 AM HFIN 3/15/2010 1:30:00 PM HFIN 3/16/2010 9:00:00 AM |
HB 36 |
| 07 HB36 Legal Opinions.pdf |
HFIN 4/18/2009 8:30:00 AM HFIN 2/8/2010 1:30:00 PM HFIN 3/15/2010 1:30:00 PM HFIN 3/16/2010 9:00:00 AM |
HB 36 |
| 08 HB36 Back up.pdf |
HFIN 4/18/2009 8:30:00 AM HFIN 3/15/2010 1:30:00 PM HFIN 3/16/2010 9:00:00 AM |
HB 36 |
| SB 125 Sponsor Statement (S FIN).pdf |
HFIN 4/18/2009 8:30:00 AM |
SB 125 |
| SB 125 Letter of Support.pdf |
HFIN 4/18/2009 8:30:00 AM |
SB 125 |
| Alaska Heating Assistance Programs.ppt |
HFIN 4/18/2009 8:30:00 AM |
SB 116 |
| ANHB Support Letter.pdf |
HFIN 4/18/2009 8:30:00 AM |
SB 116 |
| AVERAGE MONTHLY TEMPERATURES FOR BETHEL ALASKA.doc |
HFIN 4/18/2009 8:30:00 AM |
SB 116 |
| SB 116 - gallons by comunity.xls |
HFIN 4/18/2009 8:30:00 AM |
SB 116 |
| CSHB 157 (FIN) Version S.pdf |
HFIN 4/18/2009 8:30:00 AM |
HB 157 |
| SB 125 Talking Points Sen. Paskvan.pdf |
HFIN 4/18/2009 8:30:00 AM |
SB 125 |
| SB 72 HFC Amendment 1 and 2.pdf |
HFIN 4/18/2009 8:30:00 AM |
SB 72 |
| SB72AAPSupportLetter.pdf |
HFIN 4/18/2009 8:30:00 AM |
SB 72 |
| SB72ABINSupportLetter.pdf |
HFIN 4/18/2009 8:30:00 AM |
SB 72 |
| SB72Changes.PDF |
HFIN 4/18/2009 8:30:00 AM |
SB 72 |
| SB72Chart.pdf |
HFIN 4/18/2009 8:30:00 AM |
SB 72 |
| SB72OtherStates.pdf |
HFIN 4/18/2009 8:30:00 AM |
SB 72 |
| SB72Sponsor.pdf |
HFIN 4/18/2009 8:30:00 AM |
SB 72 |
| Senate Bill 116 Sponsor Statement.doc |
HFIN 4/18/2009 8:30:00 AM |
SB 116 |
| SSHB 36 Hearing Request Sponsor Statement.pdf |
HFIN 4/18/2009 8:30:00 AM HFIN 3/15/2010 1:30:00 PM HFIN 3/16/2010 9:00:00 AM |
HB 36 |
| SSHB 36 Hearing Request Sectional Analysis.pdf |
HFIN 4/18/2009 8:30:00 AM HFIN 3/15/2010 1:30:00 PM HFIN 3/16/2010 9:00:00 AM |
HB 36 |
| SSHB 36 Hearing Request Backup.pdf |
HFIN 4/18/2009 8:30:00 AM HFIN 3/16/2010 9:00:00 AM |
HB 36 |