Legislature(1999 - 2000)
05/13/1999 01:30 PM Senate JUD
| Audio | Topic |
|---|
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
SB 114-IMPERSONATE POLICE/EMERGENCY VEHICLE
SENATOR ELLIS moved that the committee rescind its previous action
in adopting the committee substitute for SB 114 for the purpose of
a corrective amendment. There being no objection, the motion
carried.
SENATOR ELLIS explained that Mr. Luckhaupt brought his concerns
about the committee substitute to his staff's attention. He
prepared a new committee substitute that corrects the problem.
SENATOR ELLIS moved to adopt the original defective amendment.
There was objection to the motion. The motion failed with Senators
Ellis, Donley, Halford and Taylor voting "nay."
SENATOR ELLIS moved to adopt the Senate Judiciary Committee
substitute for SB 114 (Luckhaupt 4/23, Version G). There being no
objection, the motion carried.
MR. JERRY LUCKHAUPT, legislative counsel and drafter of the
committee substitute, informed committee members they had just
adopted the incorrect committee substitute.
SENATOR ELLIS moved to rescind the committee's motion to adopt the
committee substitute to SB 114 (Luckhaupt 4/23, Version G).
MR. LUCKHAUPT explained that Senator Ellis's previous amendment
presented two problems. First, it is worded in the present tense
so it would allow an affirmative defense to someone who was not a
member of a community patrol at the time of the offense but who
subsequently joined one after he/she was cited for a violation.
He stated he believes the intent of the amendment was to allow an
affirmative defense to those who belonged to a community patrol at
the time of the offense. The second problem is associated with
what is an organized community patrol within a community or
municipality. Many problems have occurred over the years with
which groups are recognized as community councils by a city. In
some instances, dueling community councils were formed, each one
asserting that it is the community council for the town. The
Legislature has, for the most part, stayed out of those arguments.
The problem with the amendment is that any group can say it is a
community patrol for a particular area. He addressed that problem
in the new committee substitute by inserting language that says one
is a member of a community patrol organized with, or in cooperation
with, the municipality or a community council that is established
under municipal ordinance or charter. Therefore the municipality
will decide who the community councils are. That comports with the
two instances that he is aware of in which the Legislature dealt
with community councils in statute; one dealing with citing of
prison facilities, the other allowing communities to comment on
proposed public works projects. Both statutes refer to community
councils established under municipal charter or ordinance.
Number 120
SENATOR ELLIS moved to adopt the draft, labeled Luckhaupt 5/12
Version K, as the Senate Judiciary committee substitute for SB 114.
There being no objection, the motion carried.
CHAIRMAN TAYLOR asked Senator Ellis if the new committee substitute
addresses Senator Phillips' concern. SENATOR ELLIS said it does as
best as he can tell. CHAIRMAN TAYLOR said he does not want to
interfere with the very active community involvement in Senator
Phillips' area.
SENATOR ELLIS moved CSSB 114(JUD) from committee with individual
recommendations. There being no objection, the motion carried.
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|