Legislature(2023 - 2024)SENATE FINANCE 532
04/27/2023 01:30 PM Senate FINANCE
Note: the audio
and video
recordings are distinct records and are obtained from different sources. As such there may be key differences between the two. The audio recordings are captured by our records offices as the official record of the meeting and will have more accurate timestamps. Use the icons to switch between them.
| Audio | Topic |
|---|---|
| Start | |
| SB114 | |
| HB39 | |
| Adjourn |
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
| += | HB 39 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| += | HB 41 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | TELECONFERENCED | ||
| += | SB 114 | TELECONFERENCED | |
SENATE BILL NO. 114
"An Act establishing an income tax on certain entities
producing or transporting oil or gas in the state;
relating to the oil and gas production tax; and
providing for an effective date."
1:36:13 PM
Co-Chair Olson relayed that there was invited testimony
scheduled for the bill the following week. The committee
would consider a new Committee Substitute (CS).
1:36:52 PM
AT EASE
1:36:56 PM
RECONVENED
Co-Chair Stedman MOVED to ADOPT proposed committee
substitute for SB 114, Work Draft 33-LS0641\R (Nauman,
4/25/23).
Co-Chair Olson OBJECTED for discussion.
1:37:32 PM
KEN ALPER, STAFF, SENATOR DONNY OLSON, discussed the
changes in the proposed CS. He recalled that the committee
had adopted a CS two weeks previously that had removed the
ring-fencing provision. He identified that there had been a
technical issue that had been brought to light by industry,
which he wanted to clarify. He drew attention to Section 4
on Page 3 of the bill; which was a provision of the bill
brought forward by the sponsor that indicated that the per-
barrel credit earned on a field should only be usable to
the extent the company was reinvesting capital in the same
field.
Mr. Alper made note of the word "unit" on line 30 of the
new CS and explained that the previous version of the bill
had the words lease or property. He detailed that there
had been concern that the language could be interpreted to
mean that companies had to spend the money on the same
lease or participating area, while the sponsors intent was
that the spending could be anywhere on the unit and be able
to use all the per-barrel credits earned from production on
the unit.
Co-Chair Olson WITHDREW his objection. There being NO
OBJECTION, it was so ordered.
SB 114 was HEARD and HELD in committee for further
consideration.
1:39:30 PM
AT EASE
1:41:23 PM
RECONVENED
Co-Chair Olson handed the gavel to Co-Chair Stedman.
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|---|---|
| HB 39 work draft version H.pdf |
SFIN 4/27/2023 1:30:00 PM |
HB 39 |
| SB 114 work draft version R.pdf |
SFIN 4/27/2023 1:30:00 PM |
SB 114 |
| SB 114 Public Testimony Packet 1.pdf |
SFIN 4/27/2023 1:30:00 PM |
SB 114 |
| HB 39 Amendment 1 Kiehl.pdf |
SFIN 4/27/2023 1:30:00 PM |
HB 39 |
| HB 39 Amendment 2 Bishop.pdf |
SFIN 4/27/2023 1:30:00 PM |
HB 39 |