Legislature(2005 - 2006)BELTZ 211
04/06/2005 01:30 PM Senate COMMUNITY & REGIONAL AFFAIRS
| Audio | Topic |
|---|---|
| Start | |
| SB158 | |
| SB114 | |
| Adjourn |
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
| *+ | SB 158 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | TELECONFERENCED | ||
| = | SB 114 | ||
SB 114-SERVICE AREAS IN SECOND CLASS BOROUGHS
2:38:27 PM
CHAIR GARY STEVENS announced SB 114 to be up for consideration
and that the \G version committee substitute (CS) was before the
committee.
He explained that he held the bill over because the letter from
the attorney general was confusing. Tam Cook subsequently sent a
letter explaining her position. He asked Ms. Moss to explain Ms.
Cook's response to the attorney general's letter.
2:40:11 PM
RYNNIEVA MOSS, Legislative Aide for Representative Coghill,
stated agreement with Tam Cook's opinion that the language in SB
114 would stand up under a constitutional challenge.
It would be a violation of the constitution if the legislation
took away home rule borough powers, but the language is giving
second-class boroughs the authority to dissolve service areas
that are dysfunctional and create a liability. This is not
giving or taking away any powers from a home rule borough.
Referencing a chart that Ms. Lesh distributed, she pointed out
that home rule borough can determine what it takes to dissolve a
service area. The bill doesn't deprive home rule boroughs of the
ability to do something about dissolving service areas.
The second point is that it would be unconstitutional to limit
the ability to dissolve a dysfunctional service area to one area
of the state. That isn't the case. The bill gives the authority
to all second-class boroughs statewide.
According to Tam Cook, the language in SB 114 would stand up to
a constitutional challenge.
2:41:56 PM
CHAIR GARY STEVENS noted there were no questions or comments and
he asked for a motion.
SENATOR STEDMAN motioned to report CSSB 114(CRA), \G version,
and attached fiscal note from committee with individual
recommendations. There being no objection, it was so ordered.
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|