Legislature(2005 - 2006)SENATE FINANCE 532
04/19/2005 09:00 AM Senate FINANCE
| Audio | Topic |
|---|---|
| Start | |
| SB142 | |
| SB160 | |
| SB100 | |
| SB70 | |
| SB112 | |
| Adjourn |
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
| + | SB 142 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | SB 160 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | TELECONFERENCED | ||
| += | SB 131 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| += | SB 70 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| += | SB 100 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| += | SB 112 | TELECONFERENCED | |
CS FOR SENATE BILL NO. 112(CRA)
"An Act imposing a tax on residents of regional educational
attendance areas and relating to permanent fund dividend
applications; and providing for an effective date."
12:12:48 PM
This was the second hearing for this bill in the Senate Finance
Committee.
Senator Bunde moved to adopt Version 24-LS0505\X as the working
document.
Co-Chair Green objected for explanation.
Senator Bund, the bill's sponsor, explained that the changes in the
Version "X" committee substitute would include the addition of
Legislation Intent language in Section 1, page one, beginning on
line seven, that would allow the Legislature to utilize the revenue
resulting from the tax imposed by the bill to fund regional
educational attendance areas (REAA). Language in Sec. 2(c), page
one, lines 13 and 14, would levy a $50 fee per request for
information; language in Sec. 4(a)(1) and Sec. 4(a)(2), page two,
lines 12 through 18, would specify that the REAA tax would be
levied on individuals over the age of twelve but under the age of
65 who reside in a REAA as of January 1 of the tax year or an
employee of an REAA during a tax year. A person who resides in an
REAA and also works for the REAA would only be required to pay the
tax once.
Senator Bunde stated that language in Sec. 4(c)(1) through Sec.
4(c)(3), page two, lines 25 through 31, would define who would be
exempt from the fee.
Senator Bunde continued that language in Sec.4(a), page three, line
two, specifies that the tax must be paid prior to April 1 of the
calendar year in which it is imposed. Language in Sec. 4(c)(1),
page three, line 23 specifies exemptions for those who might have
already paid the tax. In addition, the bill defines the terms
"family", "regional Attendance area", and "tax".
Conceptual Amendment #1: This amendment deletes the phrase "at any
time" from language in Sec. 4(a)(2)(B), page two, lines 17 and 18.
In addition, the following language is inserted following "tax
year" in Sec. 4(a)(2)(B) on page two, line 18.
for 10 consecutive days or a normal pay period, whichever is
less, or for more that 20 cumulative working days.
Senator Bunde moved to adopt Amendment #1.
Senator Bunde explained that this amendment defines what the term
employed means in relationship to this bill.
Senator Hoffman objected for further explanation. He apologized for
his and Senator Olson's absence during the initial explanation on
this bill, as they had been called to a meeting with Governor Frank
Murkowski. This is an important bill to both himself and Senator
Olson.
Senator Bunde explained that this language was being offered upon
the recommendation of Legislative Legal and Research Services, as
it would further clarify who would be considered as being employed
by an REAA. Specifically, it would apply to someone who held a
temporary job with an REAA but who might reside out of State.
Co-Chair Green removed her objection to the adoption of Version
"X".
Senator Hoffman asked that further discussion of the bill occur, as
this "major policy decision" would have "major impact" on both his
and Senator Olson's regions.
Senator Bunde restated his earlier explanation of the bill as well
as the Conceptual Amendment being offered.
12:20:35 PM
Senator Hoffman asked whether any consideration had been given to
military personnel who, because they live on military bases, "are
exempt from taxation". "They are not paying for their education
either."
Senator Bunde stated that military personnel who live near a
community that imposes a sales tax would pay such taxes. "Their
payment in lieu of taxes, of course, passes through to the local
school district there." Nonetheless he did not consider that a
local contribution. The State is prohibited from taxing federal
property. "No is the short answer."
Senator Hoffman noted that he has used that "exact reason" in
regards to Western Alaska "in which "well over 95-percent of land
is federal and the State of Alaska receives payment in lieu of
those taxes for all of those federal lands that are non-taxed". He
appreciated the fact that Senator Bunde recognized that fact and
has used that "same argument" in regards to this bill. "Under this
legislation, those people would be paying this tax plus the tax
that is being charged on those properties in lieu of taxes."
12:22:22 PM
Senator Bunde countered "that it swings both ways" as military
personnel who live near a military base in an urban Alaska area,
pay to support their local schools as well as the payment in lieu
of taxes money that passes through to the school district. He
"rejected any claim" that the latter should be recognized as a
local contribution for "it is simply federal money that passes
through".
Senator Hoffman argued therefore that were the land private
property rather than federal property, the land would be subject to
taxation; however, "by virtue that it isn't, that prohibits those
areas from even the possibility of being considered…"
Co-Chair Green recognized this as "a function of military service".
Many military personnel who live in local communities do support
local programs.
Senator Hoffman clarified that his argument is specific to federal
lands such as the Yukon Kuskokwim Delta National Wildlife Refuge,
which "are federal parks that are not available for taxation".
12:23:55 PM
Senator Bunde stated that "the argument is … a little disingenuous"
as a borough must be formed in order to impose taxes. There has no
interest shown in that regard. Thus, even if those lands were
private, it is uncertain whether a tax base would be provided for
the area's schools.
Co-Chair Green stated that the amendment would be readdressed
during the April 20th Committee meeting.
[NOTE: No action on the motion to adopt a committee substitute or
the amendment transpired during this hearing. Refer to the April
20, 2005 hearing in this regard.]
The bill was HELD in Committee.
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|