Legislature(1995 - 1996)
03/26/1996 08:10 AM Senate FIN
| Audio | Topic |
|---|
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
SENATE BILL NO. 112
An Act establishing a discovery royalty credit for
the lessees of state land drilling exploratory
wells and making the first discovery of oil or gas
in commercial quantities.
Co-chairman Halford directed that SB 112 be brought on for
discussion. ANNETTE KREITZER, aide to Senator Leman, came
before committee. She explained that changes within CSSB
112 (Res) address problems with terms contained within the
original bill. Concern relates to:
1. What constitutes first discovery?
2. What are commercial quantities?
3. What is the geologic structure?
4. What is the discovery date?
5. Does the discovery royalty apply to all zones in a
lease?
As introduced, the bill would allow new discovery rules to
apply to the exploration licensing program (Sec. 1). The
bill is ultimately to encourage early exploration through a
reduced royalty. Language within subsection (3) (page 2,
lines 2 through 11) narrows the scope to the Cook Inlet
sedimentary basin.
Directing attention to page 4 of the bill, Ms. Kreitzer
noted that the legislation includes non-unitized leases as
well as non-producing leases. Language also states that
leases that carry the former discovery royalty provision
cannot apply under the new program.
In her closing remarks, Ms. Kreitzer reiterated that the
royalty program applies only to leases in the Cook Inlet
sedimentary basin (effective on all non-producing, non-
unitized leases) and future leases certified as first
discovery by the commissioner six months after the effective
date of the act.
Senator Rieger asked if discovery royalty provisions were
known at the time of the sale of original leases or were
they enacted after the lease sale. Ms. Kreitzer said she
would obtain an answer.
Senator Sharp voiced his understanding that Cook Inlet
leases on which there has been no discovery would be
entitled to a 5 percent royalty on future discoveries for
ten years. Ms. Kreitzer noted that the royalty would apply
to discoveries in the Cook Inlet sedimentary basin. If a
non-producing, non-unitized lease is involved, the owner
could apply for first discovery (one per lease).
Senator Sharp voiced his understanding that all production
from the lease, regardless of the number of wells, would be
subject to the 5 percent royalty. In response to a question
from Senator Sharp concerning the number of leases involved,
Ms. Kreitzer directed attention to backup materials (copies
on file in the original Senate Finance Committee file for SB
112) and referenced a list of leases as well as a legal
decision outlining problems with the previous program.
Discussion followed regarding the proposed royalty program
and the existing exploration incentive credit. Ms. Kreitzer
noted that the exploration license is separate and unrelated
to discovery royalty credits. One working under an
exploration license could apply for a discovery royalty.
Ms. Kreitzer next spoke to situations surrounding earlier
passage of the exploration license program. She voiced her
understanding that regulations for the program were only
recently promulgated by the department.
Senator Sharp asked if the proposed bill would allow one to
pyramid discovery benefits or exploration credits to where
the "state would be receiving less than a minimum of 5
percent on oil production." Ms. Kreitzer responded that
while that is not the intent of the proposed legislation,
she would review the situation to determine whether it is a
possibility and whether there is need for limiting language.
END: SFC-96, #52, Side 1
BEGIN: SFC-96, #52, Side 2
Senator Sharp directed attention to page 3, line 25, and
expressed need for clarification of new language commencing
there and continuing to the next page. Ms. Kreitzer asked
if it was the intent of the committee that the bill not
allow opportunity for one to apply under more than one
program, resulting in more than a 5 percent royalty
reduction. Senator Sharp again voiced concern regarding
opportunity, through the proposed bill in combination with
other programs, for the state to receive less than the 5
percent minimum. Ms. Kreitzer said she did not know whether
bill language needed to be clarified to preclude that
opportunity. Co-chairman Halford acknowledged need to
answer that question and directed that the bill be held in
committee pending receipt of additional information.
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|