Legislature(2013 - 2014)BELTZ 105 (TSBldg)
02/24/2014 01:30 PM Senate JUDICIARY
| Audio | Topic |
|---|---|
| Start | |
| SB108 | |
| SB171 | |
| SJR21 | |
| Adjourn |
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
| *+ | SB 108 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| *+ | SB 171 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | TELECONFERENCED | ||
| = | SJR 21 | ||
SB 108-LIMIT PUBLIC ACCESS TO CRIMINAL RECORDS
1:32:46 PM
CHAIR COGHILL announced the consideration of SB 108. "An Act
relating to the confidentiality of certain records of criminal
cases; and providing for an effective date." This was the first
hearing.
1:32:54 PM
SENATOR DYSON, sponsor of SB 108, informed the committee that
this was one of several criminal justice issues he's worked on
for several years. The bill says that a person whose case never
went to trial or one that resulted in acquittal would have their
case removed from CourtView after 90 days. The records would
still be available to attorneys and law enforcement, but would
not be available to the public.
He reported that he's tried to get the last two attorneys
general and the Department of Law to take on the task of
updating the criminal justice code, but on this issue there had
been no progress. He directed attention to a handout in the
packet from the Alaska Justice Forum that talks about this
issue.
CHAIR COGHILL recognized that Senator McGuire joined the
committee.
1:37:23 PM
CHUCK KOPP, Staff, Senator Fred Dyson, introduced SB 108
speaking to the following sponsor statement: [Original
punctuation provided.]
SB 108 seeks to strengthen privacy and liberty
interests of persons by designating confidential (as
defined in Administrative Rule of Court 37.5) certain
court records associated with dismissed and acquitted
charges. SB 108 would make court records of a criminal
case confidential if 90 days have elapsed from the
date of acquittal or dismissal, and 1) the person was
acquitted of all charges filed in the case; 2) all
criminal charges against the person have been
dismissed; or 3) the person was acquitted of some of
the charges in the case, and the remaining charges
were dismissed.
SB 108 does not pose any restriction to police and
prosecution ability to access arrest records and
charging documents. It does not remove information in
the federal National Crime Information Center (NCIC)
database, or in the Alaska Public Safety Information
Network (APSIN) state database, and would not render
information already in the public domain confidential.
CourtView, the Alaska Trial Courts online publicly
accessible database, provides exceptional access for
persons seeking information on the status of criminal
and civil cases, the nature of criminal charges filed
against persons, and the final outcome of litigation.
CourtView indefinitely shows arrest and charging
documents for persons who were never convicted or
incarcerated, and is an unrestricted site allowing
anyone to use the database to screen any person, for
any reason. In spite of CourtView user warnings that a
charge is not to be considered a conviction, this
public posting of a person's name and charges has had
significant deleterious effects on employment
prospects, ability to find housing, and other
professional and personal opportunities of many
Alaskans.
By very definition, a person is not a criminal if
acquitted at trial, or if their case is dismissed by
the prosecution and not refiled in a timely manner. In
American jurisprudence, we are all to be considered
innocent until proven guilty. SB 108 strengthens this
maxim of presumption of innocence by treating as
confidential court records associated with dismissed
and acquitted charges.
MR. KOPP provided the following sectional analysis:
Section 1
Amends AS 22.35 by adding a new section, AS 22.35.030.
Records concerning criminal cases resulting in
acquittal or dismissal confidential.
This section establishes that a court record of a
criminal case is confidential if 90 days have elapsed
from the date of acquittal or dismissal and (1) the
person was acquitted of all charges filed in the case;
(2) all charges against the person have been
dismissed; or (3) the person was acquitted of some of
the charges in the case, and the remaining charges
were dismissed.
Section 2
Adds a new section to AS 22.35 which establishes the
Applicability of the Act to criminal charges concluded
on or after the effective date of the Act by dismissal
or by acquittal of the defendant.
Section 3
Act takes effect July 1, 2014.
1:41:43 PM
SENATOR WIELECHOWSKI asked how this would work in the case of an
appeal.
MR. KOPP replied the case information would be on CourtView
during the entire appeal process.
SENATOR MCGUIRE summarized the case of Nancy Means. On Black
Friday this 18-year-old young woman was out shopping with her
friends who were age 17. When Ms. Means' car became disabled,
she pulled to the side of the road to look for help. A police
officer stopped and rather than giving assistance he proceeded
to ask a series of questions. When the questions became
invasive, Ms. Means asserted her constitutional rights and
refused to answer any further questions. At that point, the
officer administered a walking test and arrested her on
suspicion of DUI. When Ms. Means was tested at the police
station she blew a blood-alcohol-content of 0.00. Since this
incident occurred, she's been fighting to get it expunged
because the record says she was arrested on suspicion of DUI,
regardless of the facts to the contrary.
SENATOR MCGUIRE asked if the bill would apply to Ms. Means' case
because it's not really an acquittal or a dismissal.
MR. KOPP offered his belief that the bill would apply to Ms.
Means because dismissals include those charges when the district
attorney declines to issue an indictment.
1:45:08 PM
SENATOR MCGUIRE said she'd like that on the record, because she
wanted these kinds of cases covered.
MR. KOPP reiterated his belief that the bill would apply in that
sort of circumstance.
CHAIR COGHILL said he'd like that question answered definitively
when the bill was brought forward again.
SENATOR DYSON expressed hope that if the Department of Law had
any concerns with the bill that they'd agree to meet and discuss
the matter before the next hearing.
SENATOR WIELECHOWSKI said he'd heard from many constituents who
have had this problem and he appreciated that the sponsor was
addressing it. He expressed interest in having a discussion
about both sides of this issue, because this was impacting a lot
of Alaskans in an adverse way.
1:48:11 PM
CHAIR COGHILL said the Court System and the Department of Law
would be asked to speak to the bill in a subsequent hearing. He
stated that he would hold SB 108 in committee for further
consideration.
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|---|---|
| SB108-DOA-PDA-02-20-14.pdf |
SJUD 2/24/2014 1:30:00 PM |
SB 108 |
| SB108-DOA-OPA-02-21-14.pdf |
SJUD 2/24/2014 1:30:00 PM |
SB 108 |
| SB108-ACS-TRC-01-31-14.pdf |
SJUD 2/24/2014 1:30:00 PM |
SB 108 |
| SB108-LAW-CRIM-02-21-14.pdf |
SJUD 2/24/2014 1:30:00 PM |
SB 108 |
| SB 108 - Rule 37.pdf |
SJUD 2/24/2014 1:30:00 PM |
SB 108 |
| SB 108 - Collateral Consequences in Alaska.pdf |
SJUD 2/24/2014 1:30:00 PM |
SB 108 |
| SB 108 - Section Analysis.pdf |
SJUD 2/24/2014 1:30:00 PM |
SB 108 |
| SB 108 - Sponsor Statement.pdf |
SJUD 2/24/2014 1:30:00 PM |
SB 108 |
| SB171-LAW-CIV-02-21-14.pdf |
SJUD 2/24/2014 1:30:00 PM |
SB 171 |
| SB171-DHSS-CSM-02-21-14.pdf |
SJUD 2/24/2014 1:30:00 PM |
SB 171 |
| SB171-DOA-OPA-02-21-14.pdf |
SJUD 2/24/2014 1:30:00 PM |
SB 171 |
| Version U Marked Up.pdf |
SJUD 2/24/2014 1:30:00 PM |
SB 171 |
| 7 AAC 54.020 Protected Info.docx |
SJUD 2/24/2014 1:30:00 PM |
SB 171 |
| Sectional.docx |
SJUD 2/24/2014 1:30:00 PM |
SB 171 |
| MDTs By 2010.pdf |
SJUD 2/24/2014 1:30:00 PM |
SB 171 |
| Sponsor Statement.pdf |
SJUD 2/24/2014 1:30:00 PM |
SB 171 |