Legislature(1997 - 1998)
03/25/1997 03:33 PM Senate STA
| Audio | Topic |
|---|
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
SB 105 ETHICS/LOBBYING/CAMPAIGN FINANCE
CHAIR GREEN announced the committee just received an amendment that
includes the Executive Ethics Act under SB 105. That amendment was
included in legislation last year that passed the Senate.
SENATOR WARD moved to adopt the amendment (#1). There being no
objection, the motion carried.
SENATOR WARD moved CSSB 105 (STA) from committee with individual
recommendations.
CHAIR GREEN announced a second amendment was prepared that pertains
to legislative employees. She asked Terry Cramer, Legislative
Legal and Research Services, to explain the amendment.
TAPE 97-14, SIDE A
Number 000
TERRY CRAMER stated amendment #2 corrects an oversight and pertains
how legislative employees who, for the first time, are employed at
a Range 19 position and will be required to file financial
disclosure statements. The general deadline is February 15 for
Range 19 employees, however if an employee was a Range 15 and gets
promoted to a Range 19 or above, the employee must file within 60
days.
SENATOR WARD withdrew his motion to move CSSB 105(STA) from
committee, and instead moved to adopt amendment #2. There being no
objection, amendment #2 was adopted.
SENATOR WARD moved CSSB 105(STA) out of committee with individual
recommendations and accompanying fiscal notes. There being no
objection, CSSB 105(STA) moved from the Senate State Affairs
Committee with individual recommendations.
Number 072
NEIL SLOTNICK , Assistant Attorney General, Department of Law,
explained he is responsible for implementation of the Executive
Branch Ethics Act and has served in that capacity for the past
three years. He made the following comments. The Department of
Law is opposed to Amendment #1. From his experience, he believes
Amendment #1 is bad for state government and waters down an Act
that has worked well for the last ten years. It makes the Act and
more expensive to administer, and is unconstitutional. The
Executive Branch is different from the Legislative Branch; if the
Executive Branch Act needs amending, DOL is open to that, but does
not know what problem this approach is trying to fix. As
supervisor of all Ethics Act cases, he urged legislators to ask
questions of him or the Personnel Board on decisions. He stated if
the Legislature is critical of how DOL has handled ethics
complaints, he would like to be informed. He emphasized that
before changes are made to this Act, a record of problems needs to
be established so that they can be addressed in another vehicle.
He asked legislators to treat the Executive Branch Ethics Act as a
separate subject, because mixing the two will complicate the Act.
MIKE MCMULLEN , Director of the Division of Personnel, Department of
Administration, stated he will distribute copies of Amendment #1 to
the Personnel Board for their review and position. He asked if
DOA's fiscal note is accompanying the bill.
SENATOR MILLER answered it is, however CSSB 105 (STA) will be heard
in the Senate Finance Committee and adequate time will be available
to submit a new fiscal note. MR. MCMULLEN stated Amendment #1 will
increase the Personnel Board's workload.
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|