Legislature(2007 - 2008)SENATE FINANCE 532
03/26/2007 09:00 AM Senate FINANCE
| Audio | Topic |
|---|---|
| Start | |
| HB35 | |
| SB89 | |
| SB105 | |
| Adjourn |
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
| + | HB 35 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | SB 89 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | SB 105 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | TELECONFERENCED |
CS FOR SENATE BILL NO. 105(TRA)
"An Act extending, for purposes of a program of debt
reimbursement to municipalities, the date by which debt
must be incurred for a small boat harbor; and providing for
an effective date."
This was the first hearing for this bill in the Senate Finance
Committee.
Co-Chair Stedman communicated that the intent would be to move
this bill from Committee today unless new information or
unanticipated circumstances were presented.
Co-Chair Hoffman, the bill's sponsor, deferred to staffer John
Weise to present the bill.
JOHN WEISE, Staff to Co-Chair Hoffman, stated that this bill is
a continuum to HB 528, which was passed by the Legislature in
2002. Due to a number of delays, including a lengthy
environmental impact statement (EIS) process, the small boat
harbor project in the City of Unalaska which was specified in
that bill could not be completed by the 2007 deadline.
Mr. Weise displayed a schematic [copy not provided] of the
overall project and communicated that the outer harbor work,
which is a federal project, must be completed before the City of
Unalaska could conduct the inner harbor work addressed in HB
528.
Mr. Weise advised that the funding mechanism for the outer
harbor work that would be conducted by the federal Corps of
Engineers had changed, and the work could not begin until full
federal funding was allocated. This funding was anticipated to
be included in the FFY 2008 appropriation bill with construction
to begin in 2009.
Mr. Weise stated that the total cost of the inner harbor project
work that would be conducted by the City of Unalaska is
estimated to be approximately $12 million dollars. Five million
dollars of that was reimbursable by the State.
9:50:16 AM
In response to a question from Co-Chair Stedman, Mr. Weise
stated that language in the title of the original version of SB
105 mirrored that of HB 528. The intent of this bill was to
extend the 2007 deadline for debt incurred for projects
specified in HB 528 to 2012. The Unalaska small boat harbor
project is the only project included in that bill that has not
incurred debt.
Mr. Weise specified that since the title of the bill could not
specifically denote the Unalaska small boat harbor in its title,
the goal of the committee substitute adopted by the Senate
Transportation Committee was to "make it as tight as possible so
that the funding would only get directed toward a small boat
harbor, and, in this case, Unalaska's".
Senator Huggins concluded therefore, that even though multiple
harbors were identified in HB 528, funding would be limited to
the Unalaska small harbor project.
Mr. Weise expressed that the other harbors would be covered
since they are still in the bill. The distinction is that, with
the exception of Unalaska, debt for the other harbor projects
has been incurred.
Co-Chair Stedman specified that this bill would not incur any
fiscal impact to the State, as the fiscal impacts had been
addressed in HB 528. This bill would simply extend the timeline
of that legislation.
Mr. Weise noted that a representative of the City of Unalaska
was available to answer questions.
9:53:11 AM
Senator Dyson spoke in support of the bill. "Dutch
Harbor/Unalaska is the largest fishing port" in North America
and perhaps the world, in terms of "fish poundage or value".
Fishing in that area is dangerous and it is imperative that
boats have access to safe harbors. The Dutch Harbor/Unalaska
area is the largest fishing industry location in the State and
is a significant supporter of the industry.
Co-Chair Hoffman moved to report the bill from Committee with
individual recommendations and accompanying fiscal notes.
There being no objection, CSSB 105(TRA) was REPORTED from
Committee with two previous zero fiscal notes: fiscal note #1
from Department of Commerce, Community and Economic Development
and fiscal note #2 from the Department of Transportation and
Public Facilities.
AT EASE 9:55:05 AM / 9:55:02 AM
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|