Legislature(2003 - 2004)
04/07/2003 01:33 PM Senate HES
| Audio | Topic |
|---|
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
SB 104-REPEAL CHARTER SCHOOL GRANTS
CHAIR FRED DYSON announced SB 104 to be up for consideration. In
preparing this legislation for charter schools, he asked if
federal money was going to be there for sure and when did it
start. The answer he got was almost certainly, but they wouldn't
know until mid-summer. He wondered if they should delay passing
this bill until they are sure of funding and the answer he got
back today was that the governor would prefer that it pass with
contingency language. He prepared draft contingency language
saying this bill only goes into effect if the federal government
agreement happens.
MR. EDDY JEANS explained that this legislation would repeal the
state grants for start-up funds for charter schools. It was his
understanding that one of the reasons the state started down
that road was because there was minimal federal support for
starting charter schools. He has a chart that shows the state
was granting charter schools $140,000 to $180,000 in federal
funds. The Legislature passed the state program that consisted
of $500 per student in addition to the federal grants. The
highest total for the two grants combined for any of the state's
original charters was $478,000 - a family partnership school
charter out of Anchorage.
He said the department had a dialogue with the federal
government and had talked with the director of charter schools
and floated a proposal that gave charter schools $150,000 per
year for the first four years with a $45,000 grant in the fifth
year for a total of $495,000. That would easily exceed the
combined grant of federal and state that school districts
received previously. However, there is no signed grant
agreement, yet, and the application is due April 28. They should
know by mid to late June whether or not those funds are coming.
The charter school coordinator received an e-mail from the
director, Dean Kern, saying he liked the proposal, but they
still have to go through the grant application process.
SENATOR WILKEN moved to adopt conceptual amendment number 1.
SENATOR GUESS objected for discussion purposes. She asked if the
Legislature would evaluate the federal funds it would receive
each year or just the first year.
MR. JEANS replied that he understands that this amendment would
delay the repeal of the state charter school grant until the
department knows whether or not they have secured the federal
funding this summer. The effective date of the bill as it is
currently written is July 1, 2004. They currently have a
$158,000 request in this year's budget, which will make all
charter schools whole under this state program. He thought that
Senator Dyson's concern was if they don't get the funding, then
the repeal date becomes July 1, 2004 and it just falls off the
books. If they secure the federal funds this year, he
understands that the state grant would come off the books in
July 1, 2004.
CHAIR DYSON said the fundamental question that Senator Guess was
asking is what happens if the federal funds go away in the
future.
MR. JEANS replied that at that point the Legislature would have
to determine whether they wanted to initiate a state grant
program again.
CHAIR DYSON asked what was the length of the federal commitment.
MR. JEANS replied five years and they will be requesting $10
million in federal start up grants.
SENATOR GUESS commented that he had clarified her question and
then asked another about whether he had thought about putting a
sunset of five years on the repeal. She was concerned about what
would happen if the federal funds and the start up funds for
charter schools both go away.
MR. JEANS replied that he did not have any discussions with the
administration about a sunset date.
CHAIR DYSON added that Senators Guess and Davis had discussions
with him about a possible task force to take a much broader look
at the whole charter school business. He thought this would be
one of the things they would look at, but he, personally, would
not recommend a sunset right now.
SENATOR WILKEN moved to report CSSB 104(HES) from committee with
individual recommendations and attached fiscal notes. There were
no objections and it was so ordered.
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|