Legislature(2015 - 2016)SENATE FINANCE 532
04/11/2016 09:00 AM Senate FINANCE
Note: the audio
and video
recordings are distinct records and are obtained from different sources. As such there may be key differences between the two. The audio recordings are captured by our records offices as the official record of the meeting and will have more accurate timestamps. Use the icons to switch between them.
Audio | Topic |
---|---|
Start | |
SB101 | |
SB201 | |
SJR12 | |
SB196 | |
SB210 | |
Adjourn |
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+= | SB 101 | TELECONFERENCED | |
+= | SB 200 | TELECONFERENCED | |
+= | SB 201 | TELECONFERENCED | |
+= | SJR 12 | TELECONFERENCED | |
+= | SB 196 | TELECONFERENCED | |
+= | SB 210 | TELECONFERENCED | |
+ | TELECONFERENCED |
SENATE BILL NO. 101 "An Act relating to fees for use of state park system facilities; and relating to the sale of merchandise by the Department of Natural Resources." 9:23:21 AM Co-Chair MacKinnon recalled that the committee had previously adopted the committee substitute (CS) for SB 101(FIN) (version E), which had included an amendment. She noted that the public hearing had been opened and closed on March 17, 2016. Vice-Chair Micciche discussed the fiscal note, (OMB component 3001), from the Department of Natural Resources. The appropriation was for Parks and Outdoor Recreation with an allocation for Parks Management and Access. He conveyed that it was a zero fiscal note with no capital and no added employees. BEN ELLIS, DIRECTOR, ALASKA STATE PARKS (via teleconference), addressed the fiscal note and shared that state parks was not looking for an appropriation to start a program. He thought there were many steps needed before the department was able to sell merchandise as proposed in the bill. He furthered that the department had not put any funds towards getting a trademark, but had done some preliminary work on a business plan. He thought the program would move forward by reallocating funds that would have been put toward park operations. He thought it was a modest way to grow the concept. Co-Chair MacKinnon pointed out that the bill was taking a different direction from the previous committee. The CS would allow more flexibility for the department to sell products to benefit the parks, which she thought some might view as competition with private companies. Vice-Chair Micciche MOVED to report CSSB 101(FIN) out of Committee with individual recommendations and the accompanying fiscal note. CSSB 101(FIN) was REPORTED out of committee with a "do pass" recommendation and with one new zero fiscal note from the Department of Natural Resources. 9:26:47 AM AT EASE 9:28:58 AM RECONVENED
Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
---|---|---|
SB 200 Public Testimony Nees.pdf |
SFIN 4/11/2016 9:00:00 AM |
SB 200 |
SB 200 NEA Alaska Letter.pdf |
SFIN 4/11/2016 9:00:00 AM |
SB 200 |
SB 210 Community Revenue Sharing Estimates.pdf |
SFIN 4/11/2016 9:00:00 AM |
SB 210 |
SB 201 Responses to questions during SB 201 hearing SFIN 4.pdf |
SFIN 4/11/2016 9:00:00 AM |
SB 201 |
SB 210 with $38.2 million vs Status Quo with $60 million.pdf |
SFIN 4/11/2016 9:00:00 AM |
SB 210 |