Legislature(2015 - 2016)SENATE FINANCE 532
04/11/2016 09:00 AM Senate FINANCE
Note: the audio
and video
recordings are distinct records and are obtained from different sources. As such there may be key differences between the two. The audio recordings are captured by our records offices as the official record of the meeting and will have more accurate timestamps. Use the icons to switch between them.
| Audio | Topic |
|---|---|
| Start | |
| SB101 | |
| SB201 | |
| SJR12 | |
| SB196 | |
| SB210 | |
| Adjourn |
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
| += | SB 101 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| += | SB 200 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| += | SB 201 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| += | SJR 12 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| += | SB 196 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| += | SB 210 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | TELECONFERENCED |
SENATE BILL NO. 101
"An Act relating to fees for use of state park system
facilities; and relating to the sale of merchandise by
the Department of Natural Resources."
9:23:21 AM
Co-Chair MacKinnon recalled that the committee had
previously adopted the committee substitute (CS) for SB
101(FIN) (version E), which had included an amendment. She
noted that the public hearing had been opened and closed on
March 17, 2016.
Vice-Chair Micciche discussed the fiscal note, (OMB
component 3001), from the Department of Natural Resources.
The appropriation was for Parks and Outdoor Recreation with
an allocation for Parks Management and Access. He conveyed
that it was a zero fiscal note with no capital and no added
employees.
BEN ELLIS, DIRECTOR, ALASKA STATE PARKS (via
teleconference), addressed the fiscal note and shared that
state parks was not looking for an appropriation to start a
program. He thought there were many steps needed before the
department was able to sell merchandise as proposed in the
bill. He furthered that the department had not put any
funds towards getting a trademark, but had done some
preliminary work on a business plan. He thought the program
would move forward by reallocating funds that would have
been put toward park operations. He thought it was a modest
way to grow the concept.
Co-Chair MacKinnon pointed out that the bill was taking a
different direction from the previous committee. The CS
would allow more flexibility for the department to sell
products to benefit the parks, which she thought some might
view as competition with private companies.
Vice-Chair Micciche MOVED to report CSSB 101(FIN) out of
Committee with individual recommendations and the
accompanying fiscal note.
CSSB 101(FIN) was REPORTED out of committee with a "do
pass" recommendation and with one new zero fiscal note from
the Department of Natural Resources.
9:26:47 AM
AT EASE
9:28:58 AM
RECONVENED
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|---|---|
| SB 200 Public Testimony Nees.pdf |
SFIN 4/11/2016 9:00:00 AM |
SB 200 |
| SB 200 NEA Alaska Letter.pdf |
SFIN 4/11/2016 9:00:00 AM |
SB 200 |
| SB 210 Community Revenue Sharing Estimates.pdf |
SFIN 4/11/2016 9:00:00 AM |
SB 210 |
| SB 201 Responses to questions during SB 201 hearing SFIN 4.pdf |
SFIN 4/11/2016 9:00:00 AM |
SB 201 |
| SB 210 with $38.2 million vs Status Quo with $60 million.pdf |
SFIN 4/11/2016 9:00:00 AM |
SB 210 |