Legislature(1999 - 2000)
05/19/1999 01:07 PM Senate C01
| Audio | Topic |
|---|
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
SB 101-DISASTERS: DEFINITION & FUND
CO-CHAIR GAIL PHILLIPS called the 2nd Conference Committee on SB
101 to order at 1:07 p.m. All members were present.
CO-CHAIR PHILLIPS noted the language that pertains to polling
legislators about convening a special session is ambiguous to the
point where the Speaker of the House or the President of the Senate
could poll only his/her majority caucus or only the people they
believe will agree. She stated that could become very political
and dangerous.
CO-CHAIR MILLER asked what provision is in current law. CO-CHAIR
PHILLIPS answered the existing statute gives the Senate President
and the Speaker of the House the ability to agree to not convene a
special session. CO-CHAIR MILLER noted the Senate used that
procedure three times last year.
CO-CHAIR PHILLIPS suggested the original language be retained.
CO-CHAIR MILLER noted he does not want to remove Section 3 in its
entirety.
CO-CHAIR PHILLIPS suggested deleting subsection (B) only.
REPRESENTATIVE BARNES asked for clarification. CO-CHAIR MILLER
noted the committee was reviewing subsection (B) of Section 3 which
relates to polling of the membership by the presiding officers.
CO-CHAIR MILLER announced there was a motion to remove subsection
(B) on page 3. There being no objection, the motion carried.
CO-CHAIR MILLER stated the word "law" as opposed to "concurrent
resolution" in Section 2, line 13, needs to be reviewed in relation
to legislative procedure used to declare an extension.
REPRESENTATIVE GRUSSENDORF informed committee members he looked
into the A.L.I.V.E. court decision which was a separation of powers
issue in which a legislative body was trying to annul regulations
promulgated by the executive branch. He stated that issue is
slightly different because the Alaska Legislature will have
appropriated money for a disaster. The same number of votes would
be necessary to enact a statute or to pass a concurrent resolution.
REPRESENTATIVE BARNES agreed the A.L.I.V.E. decision pertained to
a legislative body annulling regulations with a resolution, which
a governor cannot veto, but she questioned how the Department of
Law could tie that case to SB 101.
REPRESENTATIVE BARNES moved to delete the word "law" and reinstate
"concurrent resolution." There being no objection, the motion
carried.
REPRESENTATIVE BARNES moved to report CCSSB 101 (2d CC) out of
committee. There being no objection, the motion carried.
There being no further business to come before the committee, CO-
CHAIR MILLER adjourned the meeting at 1:13 p.m.
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|