Legislature(2023 - 2024)ADAMS 519
05/08/2024 01:30 PM House FINANCE
Note: the audio
and video
recordings are distinct records and are obtained from different sources. As such there may be key differences between the two. The audio recordings are captured by our records offices as the official record of the meeting and will have more accurate timestamps. Use the icons to switch between them.
| Audio | Topic |
|---|---|
| Start | |
| SB91 | |
| SB95 | |
| SB99 | |
| Adjourn |
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
| += | SB 74 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| += | SB 75 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | HB 275 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | TELECONFERENCED | ||
| += | SB 91 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| += | SB 95 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| += | SB 99 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| += | SB 228 | TELECONFERENCED | |
CS FOR SENATE BILL NO. 99(EDC)
"An Act establishing a financial literacy education
program for public schools; and providing for an
effective date."
7:21:10 PM
Co-Chair Foster discussed the agenda items and how he would
proceed through the remainder of session.
HUNTER LOTTSFELDT, STAFF, SENATOR BILL WIELECHOWSKI,
provided a description of the bill. He summarized that the
legislation created a half credit requirement for financial
literacy for high school students. He explained that there
was a list of 14 topics found on page 2 of the bill. The
point of the bill was to teach students how to balance a
check book. He noted that 22 states had the same
requirement and some school districts in the state required
the course. Alaska led the nation in credit card debt at
$8,026 per person with the second highest state's debt at
$7,000. The average student loan debt was $34,000. In
addition, only one-third of Americans could cover a $400.
emergency. The American Public Education Foundation awarded
Alaska a grade of F on its national report card for
financial literacy. He delineated that the bill provided a
flexible pathway to adopt the mandate. The program must be
completed before graduation and the school district could
choose how they wanted design and offer the course.
7:25:08 PM
Co-Chair Foster OPENED public testimony.
Co-Chair Foster CLOSED public testimony.
Co-Chair Foster asked for a review of the fiscal note.
KELLY MANNING, DEPUTY DIRECTOR, DIVISION OF INNOVATION AND
EDUCATION EXCELLENCE, DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION AND EARLY
DEVELOPMENT (via teleconference), reviewed the published
(FN2 (EED) fiscal impact note dated January 10, 2024, in
the amount of $71,000 in one-time funds. The appropriation
supported the development of a rubric to evaluate courses
against the requirements and would bring together a group
of 20 educators that included paying a stipend. The
appropriation also enabled the hiring of a facilitator to
develop the rubric and evaluation process and lastly,
$6,000 was for legal fees to implement regulation changes.
7:27:18 PM
Representative Galvin emphasized that she was fully
supportive of the bill and the concept of learning life
skills and financial literacy. She was concerned about the
multitude of unfunded mandates and how class sizes were
growing and growing. She asked the department how 20
teachers and stake holders would be enough to put the
mandate in place and train hundreds if not thousands of
teachers. Ms. Manning responded that the 20 educators would
comprise a committee participating in the development of
the rubric and evaluation of curriculum at the start of the
process. She elaborated that the group would help create a
process to ensure a course aligned with the standards.
Moving forward the department would ensure that any
curriculum districts submitted for approval would follow
the process. The districts would be responsible for
training educators and providing resources and the
department would ensure the curriculum aligned with the
requirements. Representative Galvin understood that the
department would hand the curriculum to districts. She
asked if there would be any support for districts in
training or classroom management. Ms. Manning replied that
the provisions of the bill required the department to
evaluate the districts' courses and the districts to
implement the course.
Mr. Lottsfeldt pointed to page 2, line 4 of the bill that
included language to the maximum extent practicable," with
the understanding that smaller districts may not be able to
offer the course. He delineated that in the House Education
Committee, Representative Himschoot included an amendment
requiring a list of open source free curriculum was
available to the teacher.
7:32:50 PM
Representative Galvin favored the language maximum extent
practicable. She referenced the large class sizes and felt
that the current policy had left children behind, and some
districts were cutting music programs and closing schools.
She would be supportive of the bill, but she was concerned
that the underlying problem of ensuring there was
predictable and adequate funding for schools was not
settled.
Representative Hannan noted that the mandate required an
increase in graduation credits. She asked if there was a
graduation requirement. She did not find it in the bill.
She determined that SB 99 referenced a program, and she was
trying to determine if it was a specific requirement to
graduate or if merely an equivalent program had to be
offered. Mr. Lottsfeldt answered it was an additional half
credit requirement for graduation. He pointed to page 1,
line 13 of the bill and read: "?A school district may
provide the program through one or more courses offered by
the school district?" The sponsor wanted to leave it up to
the school districts whether to integrate existing course
work already offered. He viewed it being taught in other
courses as well and not all in one course. Representative
Hannan thought that was the reason the bill was confusing.
She exemplified teaching an economics course and wondered
if it needed to account for all of the requirements. She
asked if the requirement was for a new credit, a change in
curriculum, or up to the districts to decide if existing
courses fulfilled the requirement.
7:37:32 PM
Mr. Lottsfeldt responded that for a school district such as
Haines that had a financial literacy requirement would not
require the additional half credit. He understood that
existing programs could count, but a junior achievement or
other program would need to account for the half credit
which equated to 60 to 90 hours of instruction.
Representative Hannan relayed that she had graduated from
the Anchorage School District and had been required to take
personal finance. She asked if Mr. Lottsfeldt knew if it
was still a requirement. Mr. Lottsfeldt answered that when
he attended West Anchorage High School it had not been a
requirement.
Representative Stapp thought it was very important to teach
personal finance. He relayed that he would cross sponsor
the bill. He thought it was very relevant and strongly
favored the concept. He would like to move the bill.
Representative Cronk did not disagree with the bill, but he
reported that "they" spent two years arguing over local
control. However, the bill mandated that school districts
teach the course.
7:40:48 PM
Representative Ortiz agreed that financial literacy was a
good thing to learn; however, he shared the concerns about
local control. He referenced the document specifying that
Alaska received an F grade in financial literacy and asked
how it was determined. Mr. Lottsfeldt answered that he did
not know how the rating had been determined. Representative
Ortiz was skeptical that the requirements could be
evaluated, and a curriculum could be developed for $71,000.
He asked how it would work. Mr. Lottsfeldt answered that he
did not know. He understood that the Department of
Education and Early Development (DEED) put forward the
amount that was necessary to do the work. Representative
Ortiz commented that the mandates were all good stuff,
but the reality was it would not all happen through the
process outlined in the fiscal note.
7:43:22 PM
Mr. Lottsfeldt agreed with Representative Ortiz's
statements. He noted that there was an interest in creating
a more real world experience for students upon graduation
but there were legitimate questions regarding funding. He
understood the concerns.
Representative Coulombe had similar concerns. She noted
that the bill contained "a lot of shalls." She relayed the
following from the bill [page 2, lines 2 through 3]: "A
school may not issue a secondary school diploma to a
student unless the student has completed a financial
literacy program?" She agreed that students should be
taught financial literacy. However, she was shocked there
was not pushback about the types of bills from the same
people advocating for local control. She asked if a
district already offered a financial curriculum whether it
could it be grandfathered in. Mr. Lottsfeldt answered that
the intention was for districts to use what already existed
if it met the rubric. The sponsor was trying to make the
mandate as easy as possible to adopt, realizing the
constraints. Representative Coulombe opined that school
districts should be teaching reading, civics, and financial
literacy courses but the state thought they were not.
Hence, there was a READS Act, a Civics bill, a Financial
Literacy bill. She was unsure whether she supported the
bill. She supported teaching financial literacy, but they
were adding more and more layers of bureaucracy for school
districts. She believed that there was an "obvious trend
for the state to keep telling districts what to do and she
did not support it.
Mr. Lottsfeldt thanked the committee.
Co-Chair Foster set an amendment deadline of Friday, May 10
at 5:00 p.m.
CSSB 99(EDC) was HEARD and HELD in committee for further
consideration.
Co-Chair Foster discussed the likely schedule and agenda
for the following day.
Representative Hannan interjected that the committee had
heard another education bill earlier in the day. She
relayed that she taught social studies for 30 years. She
announced that she would not be voting for any of the bills
where the legislature was dictating curriculum to students.
She argued that school districts taught courses in
different ways. She presumed that if a rural school
district did not require a course to graduate, they had a
specific reason for choosing not to require it. She did not
support mandating a district teach something when they may
need to focus on applied math or other subjects. She
indicated that there were three bills heading to the floor
where the legislature was mandating specific curriculum
with no extra money. She stated that Junior Achievement as
a program was incredibly successful in Juneau. However,
when the class that always hosted Junior Achievement as a
club was cut Junior Achievement was eliminated. She
believed that everyone supported teaching better financial
literacy and civics engagement, but she opposed the
legislature overreaching into areas of local control.
Co-Chair Foster noted that SB 228 would be removed from the
schedule for the following day.
Co-Chair Foster RECESSED the meeting until the following
morning [note: the meeting never reconvened].
7:52:47 PM
RECESSED
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|---|---|
| HB 275 DPS Follow-Up-1 NIJ Best Practices.pdf |
HFIN 5/8/2024 1:30:00 PM |
HB 275 |
| HB 275 DPS Follow-Up-1.pdf |
HFIN 5/8/2024 1:30:00 PM |
HB 275 |
| HB 275 DPS Follow-Up-2.pdf |
HFIN 5/8/2024 1:30:00 PM |
HB 275 |
| HB 275 Transmittal Letter.pdf |
HFIN 5/8/2024 1:30:00 PM |
HB 275 |
| HB275 Letters of Support and Letter of Opposition.pdf |
HFIN 5/8/2024 1:30:00 PM |
HB 275 |
| SB 75 & SB 74 Public Testimony Rec'd by 050624 2.pdf |
HFIN 5/8/2024 1:30:00 PM |
SB 74 SB 75 |
| HB275 Sectional Analysis Version B 3.22.24.pdf |
HFIN 5/8/2024 1:30:00 PM |
HB 275 |
| HB275 Summary of Changes Version A to B 3.22.24.pdf |
HFIN 5/8/2024 1:30:00 PM |
HB 275 |