Legislature(2013 - 2014)BUTROVICH 205
03/04/2014 09:00 AM Senate STATE AFFAIRS
| Audio | Topic |
|---|---|
| Start | |
| Confirmation Hearings: Gary Folger, Luis Nieves, and Irene Catalone | |
| SB182 | |
| SB98 | |
| SB141 | |
| Adjourn |
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
| + | TELECONFERENCED | ||
| += | SB 182 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| += | SB 98 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| += | SB 141 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | TELECONFERENCED |
SB 98-VPSO FIREARMS
9:46:14 AM
CHAIR DYSON announced that SB 98 was before the committee.
9:46:48 AM
DAVID SCOTT, Staff, Senator Olson, Alaska State Legislature,
Juneau, Alaska, said the sponsor wanted to state on the record
that he objects to the characterization of Village Safety Police
Officers (VPSO) as a private police force. He said VPSOs are
public safety officers of the state; they were created in state
law and are paid from state funds. The VPSO program is a unique
partnership between the state and the regional nonprofits and
also municipalities. He said VPSOs work daily with the Alaska
State Troopers (AST). He added that when VPSOs make arrests,
they transfer perpetrators to AST. He asserted that VPSOs are
not a private prison and not a private police force. He said the
sponsor would also like to note, and it has been talked about in
committee, that Alaska is a very unique place and we all take a
lot of pride in that uniqueness. The VPSO program is a unique
Alaskan solution to a unique Alaskan issue. He pointed out that
AST cannot travel to rural Alaska as it can in the state's other
rural regions. He said there is a difference between rural
Alaska and the rest of rural America, the difference is lack of
roads. He said the sponsor is very supportive of the VPSO
program and noted that VPSOs are on the first line of defense.
He remarked that VPSOs are the first responders in a place in
Alaska where it is tough to have AST fulltime.
SENATOR GIESSEL commented that Alaska is very unique and noted
that the State has other unique programs like Community Health
Aides in addition to Community Dental Aides, all because of the
state's rural configuration. She said her examples are analogous
and asserted that the noted aides were also professionals that
meet high standards.
9:49:31 AM
CHAIR DYSON asked if anyone in the committee room would like to
testify.
9:49:48 AM
SERGEANT CHRIS GIFFORD, Public Safety Employees Association
(PSEA), Juneau, Alaska, addressed Senator Giessel's statement
pertaining to health aides in rural Alaska. He opined that the
health aides are probably certified health aides through the
training and education required to provide those services. He
said SB 98 can be improved upon and noted that SB 98 essentially
authorizes VPSOs to carry a firearm in the same manner as a
police officer. He set forth that PSEA believes that VPSOs
should be trained to the same standards that police officers and
AST are. He explained that the purposes of the stringent
training is to ensure that in a deadly force or a potential
deadly force situation, the VPSO is capable to determine whether
deadly force is in fact authorized and that no other option is
available. He said it is the job of citizens and lawmakers to
guide those responsible for protecting the public by making sure
that those who do protect the public have the best training that
they can get. He summarized that PSEA's position is that VPSOs
should receive full police training if they are going to carry
firearms and possibly using deadly force.
9:51:48 AM
JAKE METCALFE, Executive Director, Public Safety Employee
Association (PSEA), Anchorage, Alaska, noted his background with
VPSOs. He referred to the Alaska Rural Justice and Law
Enforcement Commission Report of 2006, a report that pointed out
a lack of public safety in rural Alaska. He noted a comment in
the report as follows:
It is safe to assume that no group of Caucasian
communities would tolerate similar circumstances and
that would demand equal protection under the law.
MR. METCALFE pointed out that the VPSO program training covers
five basic areas: law enforcement, firefighting, search and
rescue, water safety, and emergency medical services. He stated
that VPSO training differs from basic law enforcement training.
He said VSPOs have different duties and do not work under the
same standards as law enforcement. He set forth that PSEA takes
great pride in the members that it represents and it is
concerned about the standards and the training that its members
get. He asserted that bad-apples are unfortunately in every
group in society. Standards and training provide the opportunity
to make sure that the best people are working in positions of
trust. He asserted that if the VPSOs are state employees, carry
weapons, and perform law enforcement duties, VPSOs should work
under the same training and standards that other state and local
law enforcement employees work under. He set forth that PSEA
thinks it is important to the community that VPSOs have equal
protection under the law, just like everybody else in Alaska. He
said PSEA urges the committee to include the same training that
other law enforcement officers in Alaska have. He asserted that
PSEA believes that the same training for VPSOs protects the
state, the native nonprofits, the VPSOs, and the people within
the village. He summarized that PSEA urges the committee to make
sure that VPSOs work under the same training and standards with
enough money provided so that VPSOs can get the needed training.
9:57:05 AM
SENATOR WIELECHOWSKI announced that he has an amendment and
offered Amendment 1.
CHAIR DYSON objected for discussion.
SENATOR WIELECHOWSKI explained that Amendment 1 is a simple
amendment that requires VPSOs who carry firearms meet the
minimum standards that are consistent with the standards adopted
for police officers. He asserted that fundamentally the VPSOs
should have the same training as those in urban Alaska.
SENATOR GIESSEL said the North Slope Borough employs its own
VPSOs who are armed. She asked how many issues or problems have
the North Slope Borough had with armed VPSOs.
9:58:26 AM
MONICA SOUTHWORTH, Staff, Senator Wielechowski, Alaska State
Legislature, Juneau, Alaska, answered that she is available to
answer technical questions about Amendment 1.
SENATOR GIESSEL stated that the amendment's sponsor indicated
that unless the more defining amendment is adopted, VPSOs will
not be competent to carry firearms. She pointed out that there
have not been firearm incidents with VPSOs in the North Slope
Borough. She recalled her comment about certified health aides
hired by the Alaska Native Tribal Health Consortium (ANTHC) that
are not state licensed. She revealed that the ANTHC health aides
program has demonstrated competency in hiring professionals.
SENATOR COGHILL noted that the original language is "Meet
minimum standards training for carrying firearms" and the
amendment states "Minimum standards consistent with standards
adopted by the Police Standards Council." He asked what the
difference was between minimum standards and the standards by
the Police Standards Council.
10:00:40 AM
MS. SOUTHWORTH replied that the amendment before the committee
directly addresses some of the concerns that were brought up by
Sergeant Gifford and by Mr. Metcalf in regards to having
extensive training which is more than the bill currently
requires.
SENATOR WIELECHOWSKI pointed out that the amendment specifically
referenced AS 18.65.240, a statute that specifies the standards
for training. He explained that the amendment sets forth that
the training should be the same as police officers under AS
18.65.240. He read the following:
The person may not be appointed as a police officer
except on a probationary basis unless the person:
1. Satisfactorily completed a basic program of
police training approved by the Council which
includes at least 12 hours of instruction
regarding domestic violence as defined in AS
18.66.990.
2. Possesses other qualifications the council has
established for the appointment of police officer
including minimum age, education, physical and
mental standards, citizenship, moral character
and experience. The Council shall prescribe the
means of presenting evidence of fulfillment of
these requirements.
SENATOR WIELECHOWSKI summarized that the difference is the
statute as currently written has minimum standards and without
definition. He said the amendment will define the minimum
standards. He added that the North Slope Borough employs police
officers and not VPSOs. He explained that the North Slope
Borough police officers would be required to meet the standards
under the amendment.
10:02:24 AM
SENATOR COGHILL asked the aide to the bill's sponsor of the bill
to respond to Senator Wielechowski's comments.
MR. SCOTT addressed Senator Coghill's question and noted that
the sponsor objects to Senator Wielechowski's amendment. He
specified that the sponsor has received assurances from the
Department of Public Safety (DPS) that VPSOs, those who apply to
carry firearms, will receive the identical arms training of ATS
and municipal police with the very same instructors at the very
same training facility. He added that DPS is on record stating
that VPSOs will receive identical psychological evaluations that
AST and municipal police receive. He said the arming of VPSOs is
going to happen, possibly as soon as May 1 when the regulations
are done. He revealed that DPS is changing the regulations to
allow VPSOs to be armed.
SENATOR COGHILL asked what would happen if the VPSOs were placed
under the Police Standards Council requirements.
10:04:15 AM
MR. SCOTT replied that the issue comes down to funding. He said
the sponsor is very concerned that the fiscal note would get to
the point where the increased costs would threaten the
communities and the VPSOs who serve.
SENATOR COGHILL remarked that he is hearing that the State would
have an additional cost. He noted that the communities would
have a choice and would bear the cost if they choose to arm
their VPSOs. He disclosed that he likes the idea of mandating
the same standards, but stated that he would honor the wishes of
the sponsor. He set forth that the issue comes down to who will
be paying the added cost.
CHAIR DYSON asked what the proposed amendment's fiscal impact
would be.
SENATOR WIELECHOWSKI explained that training would cost
approximately $9,000 for each VPSO; an amount that is not much
different than what the proposed training cost.
10:06:10 AM
CHAIR DYSON announced that he will maintain his objection and
asked for a roll call vote. Senators Wielechowski voted yea;
Senators Giessel, Coghill, Chair Dyson voted nay; therefore
Amendment 1 fails.
10:06:48 AM
MIKE COONS, representing himself, Palmer, Alaska, noted his
support in arming VPSOs. He said his biggest concern pertains to
the VPSO training and how DPS handles investigations when a
firearm is used.
10:10:37 AM
CHAIR DYSON announced the committee will stand at ease.
10:10:50 AM
CHAIR DYSON remarked to Mr. Coons that his concerns are
addressed in the bill's fiscal note. He asked Mr. Scott to
address Mr. Coon's concerns.
MR. SCOTT replied that the liability issue has been raised and
addressed by DPS.
CHAIR DYSON asked what was stated by DPS.
MR. SCOTT answered that DPS has stated that every incident will
be fully investigated. He said DPS has also stated on the record
that part of the fiscal note covers liability insurance that
goes to the regional nonprofits or local municipality
administering the VPSO program.
CHAIR DYSON noted that DPS representatives have spoken quite a
bit in favor of arming VPSOs with active supervision, training,
and cooperation. He conceded that there will be some inadequate
performances due to human nature. He recalled that arming VPSOs
has been an issue that has come up for the last six or seven
years. He noted seeing an opinion shift from not arming VPSOs to
arming VPSOs.
CHAIR DYSON revealed that he recently raised the question of
what is done with a VPSO who has to deal with a nuisance bear in
a local dump. He said clearly the response was that the VPSO is
expected to use his shotgun and do whatever is necessary to
scare the bear away or shoot the bear if there are no other
options. He questioned where a VPSO is allowed to use a weapon
to protect a village from bears but the same VPSO is the only
person in a village who cannot be armed in other dangerous
situations that are less predictable than dealing with a bear.
He shared with the committee that life changes when a gun is
pulled. He said even for a VPSO to pull their weapon to point at
another individual that significant things change. He added that
if there is ever a firearm discharge and someone is wounded or
killed, huge investigations will follow. He explained that given
so many communities that are very small and the State's
inability to cover the small communities with AST, doctors, or
expert teachers, there has got to be some adjustments to deal
with a real situation. He remarked that AST has nearly as good
of reputation as the Canadian Mounties. He explained that the
Canadian Mounties have very similar responsibilities and have to
cover vast territories where there may be no law enforcement
ever or a community constable and it is a symbiotic relationship
not unlike what Alaska expects with ATS in rural areas. He set
forth that the state has come to about as good a solution as the
State can at this time.
10:16:03 AM
CHAIR DYSON asked if there was objection to SB 98 going forward.
He closed public testimony.
10:16:10 AM
SENATOR GIESSEL SENATOR moved to report SB 98, labeled 28-
LS0754\A from committee with individual recommendations and
attached fiscal note(s).
10:16:20 AM
CHAIR DYSON announced seeing no objection, SB 98 is reported
from the Senate State Affairs Standing Committee.
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|---|---|
| Resume - Folger.pdf |
SSTA 3/4/2014 9:00:00 AM |
|
| Resume - Catalone.pdf |
SSTA 3/4/2014 9:00:00 AM |
|
| Resume - Nieves.pdf |
SSTA 3/4/2014 9:00:00 AM |
|
| SB 182 - Legislation.pdf |
SSTA 2/25/2014 9:00:00 AM SSTA 2/27/2014 9:00:00 AM SSTA 3/4/2014 9:00:00 AM |
SB 182 |
| SB 182 - Sponsor Statement.pdf |
SSTA 2/25/2014 9:00:00 AM SSTA 2/27/2014 9:00:00 AM SSTA 3/4/2014 9:00:00 AM |
SB 182 |
| SB 182 - Section Analysis.pdf |
SSTA 2/25/2014 9:00:00 AM SSTA 2/27/2014 9:00:00 AM SSTA 3/4/2014 9:00:00 AM |
SB 182 |
| SB182-DOT-AMHS-MVO-2-25-14.pdf |
SSTA 2/25/2014 9:00:00 AM SSTA 2/27/2014 9:00:00 AM SSTA 3/4/2014 9:00:00 AM |
SB 182 |
| SB 182 - Support Documents - Talking Points.pdf |
SSTA 2/25/2014 9:00:00 AM SSTA 2/27/2014 9:00:00 AM SSTA 3/4/2014 9:00:00 AM |
SB 182 |
| SB 182 - Support Document - 2011 CBA.pdf |
SSTA 2/25/2014 9:00:00 AM SSTA 2/27/2014 9:00:00 AM SSTA 3/4/2014 9:00:00 AM |
SB 182 |
| Alaska GDS 2008 Final.pdf |
SSTA 2/27/2014 9:00:00 AM SSTA 3/4/2014 9:00:00 AM |
SB 182 |
| SB 182 - Letters of Opposition - Combined.docx |
SSTA 3/4/2014 9:00:00 AM |
SB 182 |
| SB 182 - Supporting Document LAW Ltr to Senator Dyson 3-3-14.pdf |
SSTA 3/4/2014 9:00:00 AM |
SB 182 |
| SB 98 Version A.pdf |
SCRA 2/11/2014 3:30:00 PM SSTA 3/4/2014 9:00:00 AM |
SB 98 |
| SB 98 - Sponsor Statement.docx |
SCRA 2/11/2014 3:30:00 PM SSTA 3/4/2014 9:00:00 AM |
SB 98 |
| SB 98 Fiscal Note DPS-VPSOP 2-6-13.pdf |
SCRA 2/11/2014 3:30:00 PM SSTA 3/4/2014 9:00:00 AM |
SB 98 |
| SB 98 DPS Draft Revised VPSO Regs.pdf |
SCRA 2/11/2014 3:30:00 PM SSTA 3/4/2014 9:00:00 AM |
SB 98 |
| SB 98 Supporting Document Alaska Dispatch Edgmon 9-13-13.pdf |
SCRA 2/11/2014 3:30:00 PM SSTA 3/4/2014 9:00:00 AM |
SB 98 |
| SB 98 Arming VPSOs Work Session-Stakeholder Summary 9-26-2013.pdf |
SCRA 2/11/2014 3:30:00 PM SSTA 3/4/2014 9:00:00 AM |
SB 98 |
| SB 98 Ralph Andersen - tesimony and BBNA resolutions 9-26-13.pdf |
SCRA 2/11/2014 3:30:00 PM SSTA 3/4/2014 9:00:00 AM |
SB 98 |
| SB 98 Supporting Document ADN Article 3-20-13.pdf |
SCRA 2/11/2014 3:30:00 PM SSTA 3/4/2014 9:00:00 AM |
SB 98 |
| SB 98 Supporting Document Wasserman letter 2-3-14.pdf |
SCRA 2/11/2014 3:30:00 PM SSTA 3/4/2014 9:00:00 AM |
SB 98 |
| SB 98 Supporting Document McCarthy Letter 10-18-13.pdf |
SCRA 2/11/2014 3:30:00 PM SSTA 3/4/2014 9:00:00 AM |
SB 98 |
| SB 98 Supporting Document ADN Hames Letter to Editor 3-22-13.pdf |
SCRA 2/11/2014 3:30:00 PM SSTA 3/4/2014 9:00:00 AM |
SB 98 |
| SB 98 Supporting Document Kamai.pdf |
SCRA 2/11/2014 3:30:00 PM SSTA 3/4/2014 9:00:00 AM |
SB 98 |
| SB 98 Supporting Document Ron Leighton 9-20-13.pdf |
SCRA 2/11/2014 3:30:00 PM SSTA 3/4/2014 9:00:00 AM |
SB 98 |
| SB 98 Testimony with concerns Mike Coons.pdf |
SSTA 3/4/2014 9:00:00 AM |
SB 98 |
| SB 98 Concerns Document Robert Claus email 9-17-13.pdf |
SCRA 2/11/2014 3:30:00 PM SSTA 3/4/2014 9:00:00 AM |
SB 98 |
| SB 98 Concerns Document Dimitri Philemonof - APIA -9-21-13.pdf |
SCRA 2/11/2014 3:30:00 PM SSTA 3/4/2014 9:00:00 AM |
SB 98 |
| SB 98 Opposing Document Jimmy Stevens Sr. 8-12-13.pdf |
SCRA 2/11/2014 3:30:00 PM SSTA 3/4/2014 9:00:00 AM |
SB 98 |
| SB 98 Hiring Regs 13 AAC 96 080.docx |
SCRA 2/11/2014 3:30:00 PM SSTA 3/4/2014 9:00:00 AM |
SB 98 |
| SB 98 Supporting DocumentTCC Resolution 2-7-14.pdf |
SCRA 2/13/2014 3:30:00 PM SSTA 3/4/2014 9:00:00 AM |
SB 98 |
| SB 141 - Sponsor Statement.pdf |
SSTA 3/4/2014 9:00:00 AM |
SB 141 |
| SB141- Legislation - National Guard License Registration.pdf |
SSTA 2/27/2014 9:00:00 AM SSTA 3/4/2014 9:00:00 AM |
SB 141 |
| SB 141 - Supporting - AK National Guard Benefits Summary.pdf |
SSTA 2/27/2014 9:00:00 AM SSTA 3/4/2014 9:00:00 AM |
SB 141 |
| SB 141 - Supporting - Legislative Research Report.pdf |
SSTA 2/27/2014 9:00:00 AM SSTA 3/4/2014 9:00:00 AM |
SB 141 |