Legislature(2001 - 2002)
02/26/2002 09:17 AM Senate FIN
| Audio | Topic |
|---|
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
SENATE BILL NO. 97
"An Act relating to fees for probation and parole."
This was the first hearing for this bill in the Senate Finance
Committee.
Senator Ward testified this bill stipulates that probationers and
parolees under the jurisdiction of the Department of Corrections
must participate in their rehabilitation by paying a portion of
their parole or probation expenses. He spoke to the high cost of
probation and parole to the government and stressed the primary
purpose of placing offenders on probation or parole is to secure
employment.
Senator Ward indicated other states have implemented similar
programs. He stated it has been shown that those affected offenders
make the effort to stay employed so they are able to pay the
necessary fees, and therefore avoiding returning to prison.
Senator Ward expressed the intention is not to create a debtor jail
and assured this legislation would not cause this. He noted
exceptions would be made for those who are unable to pay.
Senator Ward predicted that despite victim's compensation and child
support payments, a significant number of parolees and probationers
would be eligible to receive a permanent fund dividend, which could
be garnished under this legislation for parole and probation
expenses.
Senator Ward pointed out that various broad based taxes were under
consideration in part to pay for the expenses related to probation
and parole.
Senator Ward remarked this legislation would benefit those on
probation and parole. He stated that lack of a job is one
"underlying ill" causing people to commit crimes because of the
need to fill emptiness. He commented this legislation offers a
method for offenders to "earn their way back into society".
Senator Ward mentioned the proposed interstate compact relating to
monitoring and administering probationers and parolees. He
predicted other states would be reviewing cost options as well.
Senator Ward commented this program could be cost-effective
provided the collection process is not made burdensome requiring
the addition of significant staff.
Senator Ward noted that in states with similar programs,
probationers and parolees who fail to make the necessary payments
are usually in violation of other conditions of their release as
well.
Senator Ward also pointed out he proposed this system during the
Thirteenth Legislative Session, but was unsuccessful.
AT EASE 11:25 AM / 11:31 AM
BRUCE RICHARDS, Special Assistant, Office of the Commissioner,
Department of Corrections testified via teleconference from
Anchorage about previous attempts to require payments from parolees
and probationers and statutes to this effect that were in place
from 1986 to 1991. He stated the collection rate during that period
was approximately eight percent. He qualified the proposed
legislation stipulates collections would be performed by a private
entity. However, he informed that past efforts to locate a
collection agency willing to assume these duties were unsuccessful
because collection agencies are "in the business of taking on bad
debt." Instead, he continued, a local financial institution was
employed to establish an escrow account and to mail monthly
statements to parolees and probationers, but did not pursue
collection of late balances. Therefore, he stated, the fiscal note
reflects a ten-percent collection rate for the proposed
legislation.
ROBERT BUTTCANE, Legislative and Administrative Liaison, Division
of Juvenile Justice, Department of Health and Social Services,
testified via teleconference from Anchorage to explain the
projected 80 percent collection rate reflected in this Department's
fiscal note. He shared that in-house discussions were held to
arrive at this estimate, that there is no quantitative basis for
this "subjective" assumption and that it is based on an "absolute
best case scenario". He noted the Division has been successful in
obtaining 87.7 percent payment rate in court-ordered restitution.
Because if this, he said, most juvenile offenders could be
motivated to comply with expectations imposed on them.
Co-Chair Donley asked Mr. Richards the current repayment percentage
of restitution payments ordered for adult offenders.
Mr. Richards indicated he would provide the information.
Co-Chair Donley had suggested the Department of Corrections fiscal
note should indicate that the number of new parolees and
probationers affected by this legislation would be phased in over
several years.
Co-Chair Kelly ordered the bill HELD in Committee.
ADJOURNMENT
Co-Chair Pete Kelly adjourned the meeting at 11:40 AM.
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|