Legislature(2019 - 2020)ADAMS ROOM 519
04/25/2019 09:00 AM House FINANCE
Note: the audio
and video
recordings are distinct records and are obtained from different sources. As such there may be key differences between the two. The audio recordings are captured by our records offices as the official record of the meeting and will have more accurate timestamps. Use the icons to switch between them.
| Audio | Topic |
|---|---|
| Start | |
| SB93 | |
| HB3 | |
| Presentation: Prison Programs by Dept. of Corrections | |
| Adjourn |
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
| + | TELECONFERENCED | ||
| + | HB 3 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | TELECONFERENCED | ||
| += | SB 93 | TELECONFERENCED | |
CS FOR SENATE BILL NO. 93(HSS)
"An Act relating to a workforce enhancement program
for health care professionals employed in the state;
and providing for an effective date."
9:00:51 AM
Vice-Chair Johnston MOVED to ADOPT proposed House Committee
Substitute for CSSB 93 (FIN), Work Draft 31-LS0589\S (Marx,
04/24/19)(copy on file).
There being NO OBJECTION, it was so ordered.
9:01:26 AM
BARBARA BARNES, STAFF, REPRESENTATIVE TAMMIE WILSON,
reviewed the changes of the committee substitute. She
pointed to page 1, line 9. Rural was added to the list of
areas to be covered by the bill. On page 5, lines 12-16 a
new subsection was added to allow for inflation and
utilization of the Consumer Price Index 5-year average for
calculations and allowing for the option of changing the
annual amounts without having to come back to the
legislature.
Ms. Barnes continued to page 7, lines 19-21 rural was
defined as a community with a population of 5,500 people or
less that was not connected by road or rail to Anchorage or
Fairbanks or with a population of 1,500 or less connected
by road or rail to Anchorage or Fairbanks. On page 7, line
25 doctor of nursing practice, clinical psychologist, and
counseling psychologist were added to the Tier 1 health
care professionals category. She concluded with the changes
to the committee substitute.
Co-Chair Wilson asked for a review of the fiscal notes.
9:02:54 AM
AT EASE
9:03:17 AM
RECONVENED
SARA CHAMBERS, DIRECTOR, DIVISION OF CORPORATIONS,
BUSINESS, AND PROFESSIONAL LICENSING, DEPARTMENT OF
COMMERCE, JUNEAU (via teleconference), reviewed Fiscal
Note 1. She explained that the original version of SB 93
included some responsibilities for the Board of Nursing
within the division. Therefore, she had submitted a zero
fiscal note. However, the responsibilities were taken out
in the committee substitute. The division had withdrawn its
fiscal note and currently did not have any affiliation with
the bill.
Co-Chair Wilson reviewed Fiscal Note 2 from the Department
of Health and Social Services (DHSS). She explained that
the only change to the fiscal note was the amount of money
to start the program. She reminded members that it had to
be a state program in order to receive the benefits from
the federal government. She reported there would be a
change in revenue in a forthcoming fiscal note. She
highlighted that as the fiscal note was currently written,
it was a general funds source but would be changed to
statutory receipt authority and would match page 2. The
wrong fund source was originally inserted but the amounts
would not change.
Representative Tilton referred to page 3, lines 27-29 which
talked about how an employer's payment could come from any
available source including a philanthropic institution,
health foundation, government agency, community
organization, or private individuals. She wondered if it
was possible for an employer to be receiving grants from
the State of Alaska and using them for the program.
Co-Chair Wilson invited the sponsors of the bill to the
table.
9:05:50 AM
REPRESENTATIVE IVY SPOHNHOLZ, COMPANION BILL SPONSOR,
responded that it would have to be consistent with the
grant award received by an employer and would depend on
whether the grant award allowed for the funds to be used
for the compensation of employees. She did not believe
there would be a conflict, but it depended on the grant in
question rather than the eligibility for SHARP.
Representative Tilton asked whether, as long as a grant was
consistent with a grant award, the monies could be used for
repayment. She was asking because it sounded like that much
of the program came through non-profits. Many non-profit
organizations received grant funding through the federal
government.
Representative Spohnholz responded that most of the
organizations eligible for the SHARP 3 Program were
primarily non-profits for Medicaid billing. It could also
include some grant funding. The state did some substance
abuse treatment that was grant funding. She surmised that
as long as it was consistent with the terms of the grant
application, she thought it would be okay.
Representative Carpenter noted the comment regarding not
having to come back to the legislature for additional
authority. He asked Representative Spohnholz to comment.
Representative Spohnholz explained that the rational was to
allow for the program to keep up with the cost of doing
business over time without having to come back for
permission from the legislature. She felt if the private
sector was going to essentially fund the program support
increases, and was willing to pay for it, it would not be
necessary to come back to the legislature, especially with
appropriate sideboards in place. She noted that health care
inflation was more aggressive that the Consumer Price Index
(CPI). Health are in the State of Alaska in the prior year
was about 7 percent, whereas CPI was under 2 percent. The
increases were not aggressive.
Co-Chair Wilson commented on the use of the word "may"
instead of "shall."
Representative Carpenter added that the increases were not
decided by the federal government. They would be decided by
the employer.
Co-Chair Wilson responded that he was correct that they
would have that opportunity.
Representative Spohnholz followed up that the decisions
would be made by the SHARP Council in consultation with
members of the employer community. It was not being done to
employers but by them.
Vice-Chair Johnston MOVED to report HCSCSSB 93(fin) out of
Committee with individual recommendations and the
accompanying fiscal note.
There being NO OBJECTION, it was so ordered.
HCS CSSB 93(FIN) was REPORTED out of committee with a "do
pass" recommendation and with one new fiscal impact note by
the Department of Health and Social Services.
9:09:51 AM
AT EASE
9:10:57 AM
RECONVENED
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|---|---|
| CSSSHB 3 Explanation of Changes Ver M to Ver U 4.16.2019.pdf |
HFIN 4/25/2019 9:00:00 AM |
HB 3 |
| CSSSHB 3 Sectional Analysis 4.17.2019.pdf |
HFIN 4/25/2019 9:00:00 AM |
HB 3 |
| HB 3 Sponsor Statement 4.16.2019.pdf |
HFIN 4/25/2019 9:00:00 AM |
HB 3 |
| SSHB 3 Explanation of Changes Ver A to Ver M 3.27.2019.pdf |
HFIN 4/25/2019 9:00:00 AM |
HB 3 |
| HB 3 NEW FN DOR TT PFD.pdf |
HFIN 4/25/2019 9:00:00 AM |
HB 3 |
| Unsentenced - 4.24.19 FINAL.pdf |
HFIN 4/25/2019 9:00:00 AM |
HFIN-DOC |
| DOC Programs (2) 4.23.19.pdf |
HFIN 4/25/2019 9:00:00 AM |
HFIN |
| HB 3 NEW FN DNR MLW.pdf |
HFIN 4/25/2019 9:00:00 AM |
HB 3 |