Legislature(2021 - 2022)BUTROVICH 205
03/17/2021 01:30 PM Senate JUDICIARY
Note: the audio
and video
recordings are distinct records and are obtained from different sources. As such there may be key differences between the two. The audio recordings are captured by our records offices as the official record of the meeting and will have more accurate timestamps. Use the icons to switch between them.
| Audio | Topic |
|---|---|
| Start | |
| Confirmation Hearings | |
| SB90 | |
| SB15 | |
| Adjourn |
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
| + | SB 15 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | TELECONFERENCED | ||
| + | TELECONFERENCED | ||
| += | SB 90 | TELECONFERENCED | |
SB 90-ELECTRONIC WILLS
2:41:44 PM
CHAIR REINBOLD reconvened the meeting and announced the
consideration of SENATE BILL NO. 90, "An Act relating to wills
and the probate of wills; relating to the making, witnessing,
self-proving, revocation, and probate of wills by electronic
means; relating to the choice of law for execution of wills;
relating to the certification of copies of wills; relating to
the establishment of the validity of a will before death; and
providing for an effective date."
2:41:58 PM
At ease followed by another at ease
2:43:11 PM
CHAIR REINBOLD reconvened the meeting and solicited a motion.
2:43:17 PM
SENATOR SHOWER moved to adopt the proposed committee substitute
(CS) for SB 90, [work order 32-LS0501\I], Version I, as the
working document.
2:43:29 PM
CHAIR REINBOLD objected for discussion purposes.
2:43:39 PM
SENATOR MYERS asked if the committee must first adopt the
committee substitute.
CHAIR REINBOLD clarified that her reason for objecting was to
hear the changes in Version I.
2:44:30 PM
SENATOR MYERS explained that the committee substitute (CS) for
SB 90, Version I, incorporated Amendments 1, 2, and 5, which
were previously adopted. This bill makes changes to revocatory
acts, addresses an electronic form of holographic wills, and
removes the ability to store an electronic will with the court
since the court system cannot do so.
2:45:49 PM
CHAIR REINBOLD removed her objection and Version I was before
the committee as the working document.
2:46:00 PM
SENATOR MYERS moved to adopt Amendment 1, [work order 32-
LS0501\I.1]:
32-LS0501\I.1
Bannister
3/17/21
AMENDMENT [1]
OFFERED IN THE SENATE BY SENATOR MYERS
TO: CSSB 90(JUD), Draft Version "I"
Page 3, line 5, following "form":
Insert "but not electronically generated"
Page 6, line 13, following "will":
Insert ", including a reproduction of a
holographic will,"
Page 7, line 9, following "form":
Insert "but not electronically generated"
CHAIR REINBOLD objected for discussion purposes.
2:46:29 PM
SENATOR MYERS explained that Amendment [1] would address
holographic wills. He stated that the committee previously
worked on an amendment to the bill, but the general consensus
was that it did not fully address the issues. He worked with
Senator Kiehl on language to allow handwriting in electronic
form but restrict it from being electronically generated. In
practice, this will enable people to write their wills on paper
and photograph them with their phones or scan them into computer
documents. However, it does not allow people to type their wills
on computer tablets. He indicated that concern was raised about
someone using artificial intelligence (AI) to mimic a person's
handwriting, making it difficult to authenticate who had written
the will.
2:48:12 PM
SENATOR KIEHL agreed that holographic wills are tricky. He said
that Amendment 1 gives him much comfort. He acknowledged it is
possible to envision scenarios where bad actors can commit
fraud, so the language in Amendment [1] was crafted to minimize
the risks.
2:49:02 PM
CHAIR REINBOLD thanked them for developing language to better
address holographic wills.
2:49:17 PM
CHAIR REINBOLD removed her objection. There being no further
objections, Amendment [1] was adopted.
SENATOR MYERS stated that the Department of Law submitted a zero
fiscal note. The department indicated that this bill affects
what is done in private practice. The department does not
anticipate that this will affect any state operations.
SENATOR MYERS said that this bill is technical but
straightforward. The bill would allow people to validate their
wills by using Zoom or some other platform that still can
authenticate them. He said this provides another option for
people to use during a pandemic or in remote situations.
2:51:37 PM
SUSAN POLLARD, Chief Assistant Attorney General, Statewide
Section Supervisor, Legislation and Regulations Section,
Department of Law, Juneau, Alaska, said that the department is
comfortable with the fiscal note. Senator Myers gave a correct
explanation of the fiscal note, she said.
2:52:23 PM
At ease
2:52:32 PM
CHAIR REINBOLD reconvened the meeting and opened public
testimony on SB 90.
2:52:55 PM
LINDA HULBERT, Agent, New York Life, Fairbanks, Alaska, spoke in
support of SB 90. She stated that she has worked in the
insurance and financial planning industry for over 30 years. She
has offices in Fairbanks and Anchorage but works with people
throughout Alaska. She said that the industry has evolved from
paper applications to electron processes due to consumer
expectations. She highlighted that she works with clients on
Zoom and can issue and deliver their insurance policies very
quickly. She encourages her clients to engage in will and estate
planning. However, it can be difficult for people to do so if
they lack electronic access. She offered her view that this bill
is necessary and well drafted. She highlighted that her clients
are increasingly focused on proactive estate planning due to the
pandemic.
2:55:42 PM
ABIGAIL O'CONNOR, Attorney, O'Connor Law Office, LLC, Anchorage,
Alaska, spoke in support of SB 90. She said she is one of the
attorneys that initially helped draft this bill. She related
that she has attended numerous national meetings where
electronic wills were discussed. She said she has followed the
Uniform Electronic Wills Act so she is comfortable with
electronic wills. When electronic wills were first introduced at
a conference in Orlando, Florida, she recognized that electronic
wills were trending since commercial entities have developed the
technology to make electronic wills possible. She indicated that
her firm wanted to take the initiative and work with the
legislature to design statutes to make this technology available
to Alaskans. This bill responds to the growing expectation to
accomplish estate planning efficiently without the need to
physically walk into an attorney's office, which SB 90 will
achieve.
MS. O'CONNOR expressed her appreciation for the time spent on
the amendment to address the holographic wills. She said she was
not 100 percent sure that the electronic form but not
electronically-generated language is what her firm had in mind.
Instead, her office wanted people to be able to create
holographic wills on their computer tablets. However, she said
she respected and understood the concerns and conceded. She
raised a point about Amendment [1 to Version I]. She said she
thought she may have responded to questions about the "deleting"
language. At the time, she thought it was from the Uniform
Electronic Wills Act, which provides the primary basis for most
of our language. However, she said she went back and reviewed
the uniform act and it does not have the word "deleting" in it.
She opined that this should not be an issue. Further, Amendment
[1 to Version I] uses a clear and convincing evidence standard
for issues related to electronic wills. However, the Uniform
Electronic Wills Act uses a preponderance of the evidence
standard, she said. She stated that she did not object to
Amendment [1 to Version I] as written. She expressed her
appreciation that the committee embraced the concept of
electronic wills and remote witnessing, which is just as
important as electronic wills.
2:59:35 PM
CHAIR REINBOLD closed public testimony on SB 90.
2:59:42 PM
CHAIR REINBOLD solicited a motion.
2:59:47 PM
SENATOR SHOWER moved to report SB 90, work order 32-LS0501\I as
amended, from committee with individual recommendations and
attached fiscal notes.
CHAIR REINBOLD found no objection and CSSB 90(JUD) was reported
from the Senate Judiciary Standing Committee.
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|---|---|
| SB90A.PDF |
SJUD 3/3/2021 1:30:00 PM SJUD 3/17/2021 1:30:00 PM |
SB 90 |
| SB90 Sponsor Statement.pdf |
SJUD 3/3/2021 1:30:00 PM SJUD 3/17/2021 1:30:00 PM |
SB 90 |
| SB90 Sectional Analysis.pdf |
SJUD 3/3/2021 1:30:00 PM SJUD 3/17/2021 1:30:00 PM |
SB 90 |
| SB90 Supporting Documentation Electronic Wills Research.pdf |
SJUD 3/3/2021 1:30:00 PM SJUD 3/17/2021 1:30:00 PM |
SB 90 |
| SB90 B.1 Amendment.pdf |
SJUD 3/17/2021 1:30:00 PM |
SB 90 |
| SB90 B.2 Amendment.pdf |
SJUD 3/17/2021 1:30:00 PM |
SB 90 |
| SB90 B.5 Amendment Kiehl.pdf |
SJUD 3/17/2021 1:30:00 PM |
SB 90 |
| SB90 B.6 Amendment.pdf |
SJUD 3/17/2021 1:30:00 PM |
SB 90 |
| SB 15 Version B.PDF |
SCRA 2/25/2021 3:30:00 PM SJUD 3/17/2021 1:30:00 PM |
SB 15 |
| SB15 Sectional Analysis 2.23.21.pdf |
SCRA 2/25/2021 3:30:00 PM SJUD 3/17/2021 1:30:00 PM |
SB 15 |
| SB15 Sponsor Statement 2.24.21.pdf |
SJUD 3/17/2021 1:30:00 PM |
SB 15 |
| SB15 Stupport Document States with Open Meetings Penalties Table.pdf |
SCRA 2/25/2021 3:30:00 PM SJUD 3/17/2021 1:30:00 PM |
SB 15 |
| SB15 Presentation 2.25.21.pdf |
SCRA 2/25/2021 3:30:00 PM SJUD 3/17/2021 1:30:00 PM |
SB 15 |
| CSSB 15 Version G.pdf |
SCRA 3/4/2021 3:30:00 PM SJUD 3/17/2021 1:30:00 PM |
SB 15 |
| CSSB 15 Version G Explanation of Changes.pdf |
SCRA 3/4/2021 3:30:00 PM SJUD 3/17/2021 1:30:00 PM |
SB 15 |
| SB15 Anchorage Code of Ethics Answers.pdf |
SCRA 3/4/2021 3:30:00 PM SJUD 3/17/2021 1:30:00 PM |
SB 15 |
| SB15 Answer to Violations Frequency.pdf |
SCRA 3/4/2021 3:30:00 PM SJUD 3/17/2021 1:30:00 PM |
SB 15 |
| SB 15 Fiscal Note DOA-APOC 3.8.21.pdf |
SJUD 3/17/2021 1:30:00 PM |
SB 15 |
| SB 15 Anchorage Municipal Attorney's Office Written Testimony.pdf |
SCRA 3/9/2021 3:30:00 PM SJUD 3/17/2021 1:30:00 PM |
SB 15 |
| SB 15 Public Testimony- Support 3.9.21.pdf |
SCRA 3/9/2021 3:30:00 PM SJUD 3/17/2021 1:30:00 PM |
SB 15 |
| SB 15 Public Testimony- Opposition 3.9.21.pdf |
SCRA 3/9/2021 3:30:00 PM SJUD 3/17/2021 1:30:00 PM |
SB 15 |