Legislature(1995 - 1996)
03/01/1995 09:05 AM Senate HES
Audio | Topic |
---|
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
SHES - 3/1/95 SB 83 COMMR OF ED TO SERVE AT GOV'S PLEASURE CHAIRMAN GREEN introduced SB 83 as the next order of business before the committee. SENATOR MILLER moved to adopt CS SB 83(HES), Lauterbach K version 2/28/95, in lieu of the original bill in order to have a working draft. SENATOR ELLIS objected. SENATOR MILLER clarified that the motion was to adopt the Lauterbach K version 2/28/95 of SB 83 as the working committee substitute. JAN LEVY, Department of Law, stated that she would be testifying on behalf of the Department of Law and the Governor's office. She inquired as to which CS the committee was referring. CHAIRMAN GREEN said that it was the CS dated 2/28/95. JAN LEVY explained that the original legislation introduced by the Governor's office was in response to concerns regarding the Commissioner of Education. When the Administration changed, the Commissioner of Education did not submit his resignation at the request of the Governor which resulted in financial costs to the state. The original bill had the commissioner serve at the pleasure of the governor; the Governor's office has understood the committee's concerns with this issue. This CS addresses the Governor's concerns as well as the concerns of the Department of Law. She stated that the commissioner should be accountable to someone, whether it would be the Governor of the Board of Education. Ms. Levy noted the discussion of whether or not removing the cause provisions from the existing law would be good policy. She pointed out that the Board, by statute, is composed of individuals from all over the state. She commented that when a commissioner loses the confidence of four members of the board, the Governor's office believes that should be sufficient cause for the board to replace that individual. This CS addresses the concerns of the Department of Law, the Department of Education, and the Governor's office Number 100 SENATOR ELLIS removed his objection to the adoption of the CS. SENATOR LEMAN pointed out that the CS with regard to the Commissioner of Fish and Game retains some of the power within the Board through the method of removal; the method of removal is to submit a resolution to the governor requesting the removal of the commissioner. The final decision to remove or retain the commissioner would be made by the governor. He stated that the Department of Education was different in that the commissioner would serve at the pleasure of the board. He explained that with the Commissioner of Fish and Game, the board would have to initiate the action, but the governor would still have the ultimate authority. JAN LEVY said that Senator Leman was correct. She mentioned that the Department of Law holds the position of the Constitution which maintains that a principle head of a department serves at the pleasure of the governor. Therefore, an individual serving as a department head would serve at the pleasure of the governor. She interpreted that section as providing a mechanism in which the board could initiate action if they have concerns and the governor has not begun any action. She emphasized that the Department of Education is the only department which the legislature has chosen to be headed by a board. SENATOR MILLER moved that the CS SB 83(HES) be moved out of committee with individual recommendations. Without objection, it was so ordered.
Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
---|