Legislature(2019 - 2020)BARNES 124
05/08/2019 03:15 PM House LABOR & COMMERCE
Note: the audio
and video
recordings are distinct records and are obtained from different sources. As such there may be key differences between the two. The audio recordings are captured by our records offices as the official record of the meeting and will have more accurate timestamps. Use the icons to switch between them.
| Audio | Topic |
|---|---|
| Start | |
| SB16 | |
| SB83 | |
| HB97 | |
| Adjourn |
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
| += | SB 83 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| += | SB 16 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | TELECONFERENCED | ||
| += | HB 97 | TELECONFERENCED | |
SB 83-TELECOMMUNICATIONS REGULATION/EXEMPTIONS
5:22:43 PM
CHAIR WOOL announced that the next order of business would be
SENATE BILL NO. 83, "An Act relating to the Regulatory
Commission of Alaska; relating to the public utility regulatory
cost charge; relating to the regulation of telecommunications;
relating to exemptions, charges, and rates applicable to
telecommunications utilities; relating to regulation of
telephone services; and relating to alternate operator
services."
5:23:45 PM
The committee took a brief at-ease.
5:23:48 PM
BOB PICKETT, Commissioner, Regulatory Commission of Alaska,
addressed the staff memo [included in the committee packet] and
pointed out that on February 6, 2019 on a vote of 4-1, the
commissioners adamantly rejected that language and believed it
was inappropriate for a state regulatory agency to "thumb its
nose" at the legislature by implying it would undermine a piece
of legislation if it passes. He further stated that the Alaska
Universal Service Fund (AUSF) is not part of SB 83.
CHAIR WOOL interjected to ask for clarification on what the AUSF
is and how it functions.
MR. PICKET said the fund is in statute dating back to the early
1990s. He said it was put there to allow the Regulatory
Commission of Alaska (RCA) permissive ability to create a fund
that ensured intra-state long-distance service. He noted that
it's essentially an "assessment on people's telephone bills"
that was less than 1 percent.
CHAIR WOOL asked if the AUSF is a tax that's applied to every
landline bill throughout state.
MR. PICKETT said yes, adding that wireless and voice-over
internet protocols are funding sources as well; nonetheless, the
contribution base shrank, and the tax rose to 3 percent with a
projection of growth up to 25 percent. In an attempt to cap
that growth, he said, they added a sunset provision to end the
fund on June 30, 2023 and committed to complete a comprehensive
review of the program no later than June 30, 2021. At the peak,
the whole AUSF program was approximately 34 million per year;
however, with current caps at 10 percent it will be less than
half of that.
5:33:15 PM
CHAIR WOOL asked why the fund is decreasing.
MR. PICKETT explained that the majority of a cellphone bill is
tied to data. The portion assigned to voice is small,
approximately less than 20 percent of the bill.
CHAIR WOOL clarified that the only taxable portion of a
cellphone bill is the part that's attributed to voice.
MR. PICKETT affirmed that.
CHAIR WOOL asked if sunsetting the AUSF program is the response
to higher taxes due to the decreasing fund.
MR. PICKETT said no, step one was to cap [the tax] at 10
percent, which went into effect January 1, 2019. He added that
the standalone category of Carrier of Last Resort (COLR) support
was replaced with essential network support.
CHAIR WOOL asked how COLR relates to AUSF.
MR. PICKETT said there was a specific category in which direct
funds were paid under the COLR category. He added that it
doesn't exist anymore.
5:36:48 PM
CHAIR WOOL, in attempt to understand Mr. Pickett, asked if this
fund partially subsidizes the industry to maintain COLR.
MR. PICKETT said, "not anymore," noting that it ended on January
1, 2019.
CHAIR WOOL established a scenario in which a phone line is run
out to Chicken, Alaska, which costs the telecom company a lot of
money. He asked if that company would receive assistance to
offset the costs, since it wouldn't be recouped from the 25
people that live in Chicken.
MR. PICKETT said the reality is that the company wouldn't
receive specific COLR funding, adding that they would receive a
declining amount of network support because as the contribution
shrinks the cap will be applied.
5:38:30 PM
MR. PICKETT said he got the impression that people think SB 83
would take away cost of service ratemaking ability that the
commission has in the industry; however, cost of service
ratemaking has been nonexistent for years. He said the
commission has no jurisdiction over wireless rates or broadband
rates, let alone any packages for videos.
CHAIR WOOL questioned whether SB 83 would remove the
commission's jurisdiction over landline.
MR. PICKETT said not totally. He noted that they still have
certificate power, ETC certification power with the FCC.
CHAIR WOOL sought clarification on certification.
MR. PICKETT explained that there is an initial determination as
to whether they are eligible for an ETC designation. In
addition to that, they have the certificates of public
convenience and necessity for which they must show they are fit,
willing and able to provide the service they are applying for.
He noted that walking away from the certificate requires a
proceeding as well.
5:41:08 PM
CHAIR WOOL questioned whether SB 83 would remove landlines from
the regulatory purview of the RCA.
MR. PICKETT said that's not a correct assessment.
CHAIR WOOL asked what SB 83 does in relation to landlines.
MR. PICKETT explained that it cleans up filings that are not
actionable. He offered his belief that there should be a
purpose other than collecting information when filing something.
He said that is one of the frustrations that the industry has,
whereas the co-ops can deregulate with the vote of their
membership.
CHAIR WOOL asked if co-ops pay the AUSF.
MR. PICKETT said yes. He reminded the committee that the AUSF
is not to be confused with the regulatory cost charges (RCC).
He further noted that the current statutory construct is
essentially unfair because if co-ops deregulate, they do not pay
regulatory cost charges anymore, even though they still have
proceedings that use up the RCA's staff time, resources, and
legal expenses. This bill, he said, makes all certificated
telecom companies pay into it.
CHAIR WOOL deduced that this bill would make co-ops pay the RCC.
MR. PICKETT replied yes, a small amount.
5:44:56 PM
REPRESENTATIVE FIELDS referencing a letter from Stephen McAlpine
that generally endorses the concept of SB 83, asked about the
concerns that Mr. McAlpine references.
MR. PICKETT said he shared some of those concerns, adding that
they still exist today with the existing statutory construct.
He said that with the changes in the federal subsidy stream,
these carriers have been hit with substantial reductions while
still having to maintain performance standards. He suggested
that a coherent state telecom policy direct AUSF funds and
appropriately apply them
REPRESENTATIVE FIELDS asked if SB 83 would allow carriers to
unilaterally cut off service to small communities with the
changes to COLR.
MR. PICKETT said they would have to file with the RCA to abandon
service or abandon their certificate. Then it's up to the
commission to approve or deny.
REPRESENTATIVE FIELDS asked what the COLR language in SB 83 does
if they still have to come before RCA.
MR. PICKETT said it prevents the RCA from imposing unfunded COLR
responsibilities that are over and above their ability to be fit
willing and able to provide the service they signed up for or to
stay in compliance with the federal ETC regulations.
REPRESENTATIVE STUTES asked why most co-ops support SB 83.
MR. PICKETT offered his belief that the co-ops realize if this
does not happen, the RCA will start billing them for
proceedings.
5:51:05 PM
REPRESENTATIVE STUTES said it sounds like passage of this bill
could prevent a huge increase in the amount of people's phone
bill.
MR. PICKETT said it depends on the size and the nature of the
proceeding. He added that they have already seen a decline since
the AUSF reform that went into effect January 1, 2019 that
dropped the surcharge from 20 percent to 10 percent.
5:52:07 PM
REPRESENTATIVE HANNAN sought clarification on whether the co-ops
are charged when they come before the RCA board.
MR. PICKETT said they are not charged. Essentially, he
explained, the companies that are paying the RCCs are funding
the commission's common carrier staff and section, as well as
all the associated staffing positions and the administrative
overhead.
MR. PICKETT, responding to a follow-up question from
Representative Hannan, said as long as the co-ops are
deregulated, they do not have to pay RCCs.
REPRESENTATIVE HANNAN asked what RCCs are.
MR. PICKETT answered regulatory cost charges, which funds the
RCA. He added that the RCA doesn't receive general funds.
REPRESENTATIVE HANNAN asked why co-ops were allowed to
deregulate several years ago.
MR. PICKETT stated that the co-ops deregulated under state
statute. He explained that it's subject to a vote of the co-op
members and approval from their respective governing boards.
Nonetheless, the statute very clearly gives them that ability.
5:54:15 PM
CHAIR WOOL offered his understanding that if a co-op deregulates
then the RCA can bill them for any interactions.
MR. PICKETT said the bill must be cost-based; however, the RCA
has not done that.
CHAIR WOOL opined that if a co-op votes to be deregulated and
therefore not pay RCCs, it seems fair that the RCA asses the
charges they have incurred and send them a bill. He said it is
the tradeoff for the co-op being deregulated.
MR. PICKETT explained that part of the challenge is assessing
the administrative efficiency because there is an administrative
cost to the proceedings. He continued to say that because the
RCCs are so small, it seems to be more effective for what is
included in SB 83.
CHAIR WOOL asked for clarification on what is more effective.
MR. PICKETT said the way they are proposing to spread the RCCs
over all telecom companies.
CHAIR WOOL concluded that SB 83 would take RCCs and apply them
to every telecom company, regulated or nonregulated.
MR. PICKETT said that is correct.
CHAIR WOOL gathered that under SB 83, a telecom co-op in the
Matsu that didn't charge RCCs would now have to.
MR. PICKETT affirmed that.
CHAIR WOOL turned attention to public testimony for SB 83.
DAVID GUTTENBERG, said that SB 83 is a deregulation bill, adding
that the ramifications are not yet understood. He opined that
with telecom regulations, it's important to read between the
lines and often what's being inferred is significant. He
continued by saying that it's important to pay attention to the
way in which the AUSF money is spent. He said there is no
accountability for it and it's not part of this bill, but even
so, he said that the RCA will continue to allocate money for
whatever formula they want, adding that it's important to look
at how that will impact the industry. He said they are not
putting in new hard lines so almost all they money is going
towards internet expansion and nobody knows what that is. He
said it is behind a corporate vail. He added that the nature of
telecom is changing. He pointed out that the late U.S. Senator
Ted Stevens set up the AUSF. He emphasized that the reason
Alaska has its own little version of that is to take care of the
small, rural communities, like Healy Lake. He encouraged the
committee members to fully understand this bill and what the
ramifications will be before passing it out of committee. He
addressed the staff notes [memorandum] and said they raise
serious concerns. One of which, is that the RCA could sit down
with the industry and streamline all the regulatory issues
together. He said he questions the public purpose of the bill.
6:04:36 PM
MR. PICKETT said he respects Mr. Guttenberg's comments. He
asserted that the RCA should be involved with the comprehensive
review of the AUSF now.
6:06:09 PM
REPRESENTATIVE HANNAN asked how long the comprehensive study of
the AUSF will take.
MR. PICKETT said it's in regulation that the RCA will commence a
comprehensive review of the AUSF by no later than June 30, 2021.
He added that it will take two years of information gathering
and working with all impacted parties before being able to start
the rulemaking if there is any intention to keep the fund going.
6:07:04 PM
REPRESENTATIVE HANNAN asked how SB 83 affects that.
MR. PICKETT said it doesn't.
REPRESENTATIVE HANNAN asked if the AUSF review will commence in
2021 to be completed by 2023, regardless of whether SB 83 is
passed or not.
MR. PICKETT said SB 83 has nothing to do with the AUSF or the
study related to it.
6:08:06 PM
CHAIR WOOL said the passage if this bill would take the RCA out
of landline ratemaking business; however, there are still
federal laws that could limit how much carriers could charge
regarding rates. He asked if that is correct.
MR. PICKETT said that the RCA using cost of service ratemaking
for landlines is a theoretical construct.
CHAIR WOOL asked about federal laws governing how much a telecom
company can charge for landlines rates.
MR. PICKETT said he does not know.
6:12:47 PM
CHRISTINE OCONNOR, Alaska Telecom Association, said she is
unaware of any limits on business rates.
CHAIR WOOL asked if a school in Fort Yukon, Alaska would have to
operate under any rate caps because they are nonresidential.
MS. OCONNOR said she believed that to be correct, reiterating
that she is unaware of any federal caps on business rates.
CHAIR WOOL questioned whether they would have any competition in
that if they were the only carrier.
MS. OCONNOR acknowledged that they would not have any
competition.
6:13:31 PM
REPRESENTATIVE TALERICO observed that there appears to be some
redundancy with federal government regarding some of the
services that will be eliminated. He asked if that is a correct
assumption.
MR. PICKETT said he would not characterize it as a redundancy.
6:15:02 PM
CHAIR WOOL closed public testimony and announced that SB 83 was
held over.
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|---|---|
| SB 16.Sponsor.pdf |
HL&C 5/8/2019 3:15:00 PM |
SB 16 |
| SB 16.Bill Version G.pdf |
HL&C 5/8/2019 3:15:00 PM |
SB 16 |
| SB 16.Bill Version O.pdf |
HL&C 5/8/2019 3:15:00 PM |
SB 16 |
| SB 16.Summary of Changes to Version G.pdf |
HL&C 5/8/2019 3:15:00 PM |
SB 16 |
| SB 16.Sectional.pdf |
HL&C 5/8/2019 3:15:00 PM |
SB 16 |
| SB 16.Fiscal REV.PDF |
HL&C 5/8/2019 3:15:00 PM |
SB 16 |
| SB 16.Fiscal DCCED AMCO.PDF |
HL&C 5/8/2019 3:15:00 PM |
SB 16 |
| SB 16.Backup Supporting Doc AMCO.pdf |
HL&C 5/8/2019 3:15:00 PM |
SB 16 |
| SB 16.Backup Support State Fair.pdf |
HL&C 5/8/2019 3:15:00 PM |
SB 16 |
| SB 16.Backup Support Price.pdf |
HL&C 5/8/2019 3:15:00 PM |
SB 16 |
| SB 16.Backup Support PAC.pdf |
HL&C 5/8/2019 3:15:00 PM |
SB 16 |
| SB 16.Backup Support KTVA Article.pdf |
HL&C 5/8/2019 3:15:00 PM |
SB 16 |
| SB 16.Backup Support KTUU.pdf |
HL&C 5/8/2019 3:15:00 PM |
SB 16 |
| SB 16.Backup Support KTOO2.pdf |
HL&C 5/8/2019 3:15:00 PM |
SB 16 |
| SB 16.Backup Support KTOO.pdf |
HL&C 5/8/2019 3:15:00 PM |
SB 16 |
| SB 16.Backup Support KINY Article.pdf |
HL&C 5/8/2019 3:15:00 PM |
SB 16 |
| SB 16.Backup Support Herrington.pdf |
HL&C 5/8/2019 3:15:00 PM |
SB 16 |
| SB 16.Backup Support Gilmore.pdf |
HL&C 5/8/2019 3:15:00 PM |
SB 16 |
| SB 16.Backup Support Frontiersman Article.pdf |
HL&C 5/8/2019 3:15:00 PM |
SB 16 |
| SB 16.Backup Support Eaglecrest.pdf |
HL&C 5/8/2019 3:15:00 PM |
SB 16 |
| SB 16.Backup Support CER STAR.pdf |
HL&C 5/8/2019 3:15:00 PM |
SB 16 |
| SB 16.Backup Support CER STAR2.pdf |
HL&C 5/8/2019 3:15:00 PM |
SB 16 |
| SB 16.Backup Support ATA.pdf |
HL&C 5/8/2019 3:15:00 PM |
SB 16 |
| SB 16.Backup Support AP Article.pdf |
HL&C 5/8/2019 3:15:00 PM |
SB 16 |
| SB 16.Backup Support Alaska Club.pdf |
HL&C 5/8/2019 3:15:00 PM |
SB 16 |
| SB 16.Backup Support ADN Article3.pdf |
HL&C 5/8/2019 3:15:00 PM |
SB 16 |
| SB 16.Backup Support ADN Article2.pdf |
HL&C 5/8/2019 3:15:00 PM |
SB 16 |
| SB 16.Backup Support ADN Article.pdf |
HL&C 5/8/2019 3:15:00 PM |
SB 16 |
| SB 16.Backup Letter from CHARR.pdf |
HL&C 5/8/2019 3:15:00 PM |
SB 16 |
| SB 16.Backup Letter ATA2.pdf |
HL&C 5/8/2019 3:15:00 PM |
SB 16 |
| SB 16.Backup Leg Audit.pdf |
HL&C 5/8/2019 3:15:00 PM |
SB 16 |
| SB 16.Backup Leg Audit 2014.pdf |
HL&C 5/8/2019 3:15:00 PM |
SB 16 |