Legislature(2003 - 2004)
03/27/2003 01:35 PM Senate L&C
| Audio | Topic |
|---|
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
SB 82-ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE TAX FOR WINE & OTHERS
CHAIR CON BUNDE called the Senate Labor and Commerce Standing
Committee meeting to order at 1:35 p.m. Present were Senators
Stevens, Davis and Chair Bunde. He announced SB 82 to be up for
consideration.
SENATOR STEVENS moved to adopt Amendment 1.
CHAIR BUNDE objected for discussion purposes.
MR. DOUG LETCH, staff to Senator Gary Stevens, explained he got
together with representatives from the small wineries and the
Department of Revenue to come up with new language that would
reduce the amount of revenue lost to the state. That amendment
is before members [Amendment 1]. It would delete the 3,000-
gallon per year exemption and replace it with 100 gallons per
month, which will insure that the state will receive tax revenue
on every gallon sold over 100 gallons each month. The second
part of the amendment would further protect the state by
insuring that two or more taxpayers who have a relationship in a
business would be taxed as a single taxpayer. That means a
company cannot get an exemption for each one of its brands of
wine.
CHAIR BUNDE asked what the new fiscal note would look like.
MR. LETCH said Amendment 1 needs to be adopted by the committee
before a new fiscal note could be prepared but he understood it
should severely reduce the amount of lost income to the state.
MR. CHUCK HARLEMERT, Department of Revenue, estimated the tax
impact on an ongoing basis would be between $18 and $20 thousand
dollars per year. In the first year, it would be twice that
amount, or about $37,000.
CHAIR BUNDE announced there were no further questions. He
removed his objection and Amendment 1 was adopted.
SENATOR STEVENS moved to pass CSSB 82(L&C) and the attached
fiscal note from committee with individual recommendations.
There were no objections and it was so ordered.
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|