Legislature(2011 - 2012)CAPITOL 120
04/04/2012 01:00 PM House JUDICIARY
| Audio | Topic |
|---|---|
| Start | |
| SB82 | |
| HB269 | |
| Adjourn |
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
| + | SB 82 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | HB 269 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | TELECONFERENCED |
SB 82 - FOSTER CARE LICENSING/STATE CUSTODY
1:36:05 PM
VICE CHAIR THOMPSON announced that the first order of business
would be CS FOR SPONSOR SUBSTITUTE FOR SENATE BILL NO. 82(JUD),
"An Act relating to the procedures and jurisdiction of the
Department of Health and Social Services for the care of
children who are in state custody; relating to court
jurisdiction and findings pertaining to children who are in
state custody; and modifying the licensing requirements for
foster care." [Before the committee was HCS CSSSSB 82(HSS).]
1:37:11 PM
CELESTE HODGE, Staff, Senator Bettye Davis, Alaska State
Legislature, on behalf of the sponsor, Senator Davis, relayed
that SSSB 82 would modify various provisions of Title 47 in
order to prioritize the needs of children in state custody.
Among other things, SSSB 82 seeks to ensure that older children
in foster care achieve what she referred to as "permanency";
permanency for a child, she went on to explain, is best achieved
through reunification with the child's parent, or, failing that,
through adoption or guardianship. However, she added, if none
of those options are available, permanency can still be achieved
through what she referred to as, "another planned permanent
living arrangement (APPLA)," and the bill, by providing
guidelines for both the OCS and the court regarding when this
APPLA option should be used, seeks to ensure that it is not
chosen unnecessarily.
MS. HODGE explained that in addition, SSSB 82 would allow for
state custody to be resumed in instances where the parents of a
previously-released child [age 16 or older] are unwilling or
unable to care for the child; would create a statutory
presumption that siblings be placed in the same home when
possible and when doing so is in their best interest, and
requires documentation in instances where such placement isn't
possible; would provide guidelines for a child's early release
from state custody, including proper-notification requirements
and stipulations that such release be in the child's best
interest; would statutorily stipulate that the application
process for foster parents be streamlined; would provide a
variance of applicable building code requirements for certain
foster care homes under certain circumstances; and would conform
the statutes addressing the retention of the court's
jurisdiction over a child under the age of 21, to legislation
passed in 2010.
MS. HODGE, in conclusion, mentioned that SSSB 82 has a zero
fiscal note.
REPRESENTATIVE LYNN questioned whether the bill also contains
provision for notifying necessarily-separated siblings of each
other's whereabouts.
REPRESENTATIVE GRUENBERG, mentioning that he supports SSSB 82,
expressed disfavor with Section 1's proposal to establish a
short title for the bill in uncodified law, and questioned
whether the sponsor would object to having that provision
deleted.
MS. HODGE suggested that others could better address that issue.
1:46:32 PM
CHRISTY LAWTON, Director, Central Office, Office of Children's
Services (OCS), Department of Health and Social Services (DHSS),
relayed that the OCS collaborated on SSSB 82, and finds that
[its passage] would be in the best interests of the children the
OCS serves. In response to questions, she said that deleting
Section 1's proposed short title would not have any impact on
OCS staff; that much of what's contained in SSSB 82 comports
with the OCS's concept of best practices for children and
families, and the OCS was already contemplating making changes
to OCS policy reflective of some of the bill's proposed changes;
that the adoption of SSSB 82 would enable Alaska to stay in
compliance with federal law; and that the bill won't impact the
OCS's ability to change its policies, most of which stem from
federal guidelines.
1:49:36 PM
AMANDA METIVIER, Statewide Coordinator, Facing Foster Care in
Alaska (FFCA) - noting that she is an alumni of the foster care
system, having "aged out" of foster care while living in
Anchorage, and is currently pursuing a master's degree in social
work - relayed that the FFCA supports SSSB 82, adding that it
would do a number of things to improve the lives of children in
foster care. To elaborate, she, too, noted that the bill would
create a statutory presumption that siblings be placed in the
same home when possible; regardless that federal law already
requires this of states, siblings coming into the foster care
system in Alaska are still being separated. With regard to the
bill's proposal to provide a variance of applicable building
code requirements for certain foster care homes under certain
circumstances, she indicated that this would allow more foster
children from rural areas of the state to stay in their
communities. Referring, then, to the bill's proposal to provide
guidelines regarding the aforementioned APPLA option, she
characterized this as the most important provision of the bill,
one that would help foster children obtain the permanency and
support they need in order to be successful later on in life.
VICE CHAIR THOMPSON, after ascertaining that no one else wished
to testify, closed public testimony on SSSB 82.
REPRESENTATIVE GRUENBERG observed that language in Section 3 of
the bill addresses the resumption of state custody in instances
where the person is completing an educational or vocational
program.
1:59:24 PM
REPRESENTATIVE LES GARA, Alaska State Legislature - in response
to a question, and speaking as one of the joint prime sponsors
of the House companion bill to SSSB 82 - acknowledged that
deleting Section 1's proposed short title would be a policy call
for the committee to make.
MS. HODGE concurred.
2:00:31 PM
REPRESENTATIVE KELLER moved to report HCS CSSSSB 82(HSS) out of
committee with individual recommendations and the accompanying
fiscal notes. There being no objection, HCS CSSSSB 82(HSS) was
reported from the House Judiciary Standing Committee.
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|---|---|
| SB0082E.pdf |
HJUD 4/4/2012 1:00:00 PM |
SB 82 |
| SB 82 Sponsor Statement.pdf |
HJUD 4/4/2012 1:00:00 PM |
SB 82 |
| SB82 LS0500M.pdf |
HJUD 4/4/2012 1:00:00 PM |
SB 82 |
| SB 82 Sectional Summary.pdf |
HJUD 4/4/2012 1:00:00 PM |
SB 82 |
| HB269 Sponsor Statement.pdf |
HJUD 4/4/2012 1:00:00 PM HL&C 3/14/2012 3:15:00 PM |
HB 269 |
| HB269 ver A.PDF |
HJUD 4/4/2012 1:00:00 PM HL&C 3/14/2012 3:15:00 PM |
HB 269 |
| SB082CSSS(JUD)-Fiscal Note.pdf |
HJUD 4/4/2012 1:00:00 PM |
SB 82 |
| SB 82 Letters of Support.pdf |
HJUD 4/4/2012 1:00:00 PM |
SB 82 |
| SB 82 Background Information.pdf |
HJUD 4/4/2012 1:00:00 PM |
SB 82 |
| HB269 Supporting Documents-UCIOA Section 2-117.pdf |
HJUD 4/4/2012 1:00:00 PM HL&C 3/14/2012 3:15:00 PM |
HB 269 |
| HB269-DCCED-DCRA-03-14-12.pdf |
HJUD 4/4/2012 1:00:00 PM |
HB 269 |
| HB269 Supporting Documents-Letter First American Title 2-20-12.pdf |
HJUD 4/4/2012 1:00:00 PM HL&C 3/14/2012 3:15:00 PM |
HB 269 |