Legislature(2011 - 2012)BELTZ 105 (TSBldg)
03/15/2011 02:00 PM Senate LABOR & COMMERCE
| Audio | Topic |
|---|---|
| Start | |
| SB81 | |
| SB40 | |
| Adjourn |
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
| *+ | SB 40 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | TELECONFERENCED | ||
| += | SB 81 | TELECONFERENCED | |
SB 81-PUBLIC RETIREE MED. BENEFITS: DEPENDENTS
CHAIR EGAN announced SB 81 to be up for consideration.
SENATOR GIESSEL recalled previous testimony that this issue
didn't coincide with the active employee coverage for dependents
and asked if there are there other areas of discord between the
benefits of an active employee and a retired employee.
TOM OBERMEYER, staff to Senator Davis, said he wasn't aware of
any, but the department might be.
2:04:07 PM
JIM PUCKETT, Acting Director, Division of Retirement and
Benefits, Department of Administration (DOA), said there are
some differences between the active plan and the retiree plan.
The differences are in deductible, co-pay, and some of the
various coverages. The retiree plan is an older plan and has
been slower to have changes implemented in it, but the active
plan has been better able to keep up with technological changes.
SENATOR GIESSEL asked if they are likely to see other changes to
retiree benefits and if they wait for people to complain before
making changes.
MR. PUCKETT replied one way to change the benefits is to bring a
bill forward like now.
SENATOR PASKVAN said his inference in the way he presented the
retirement plan is that it is better than the current plan. The
question is about the materiality of the differences.
MR. PUCKETT replied it depends on perspective. The retiree plan
has lower deductibles and co-pays and lower cost to the members.
It doesn't have as many preventive services as in the active
plan. It's an older plan that because of some previous court
cases makes it harder to change due to Article XII, Section 7,
of the State Constitution. Both plans have strengths and
weaknesses.
SENATOR PASKVAN asked if enacting SB 81 avoids a lawsuit that is
highly likely if dependents up to age 26 are not covered in the
retiree plan.
MR. PUCKETT answered that Legislative Legal has opined that the
state should provide it. Other opinions say differently.
2:07:50 PM
SENATOR PASKVAN said the National Association of Insurance
Commissioners says that federal law mandates coverage if
dependent coverage is available up to age 26, and asked if he
agreed with that.
MR. PUCKETT answered that he didn't know if they were addressing
a governmental plan or not. There is a difference between
private insurance and a grandfathered retiree plan such as
Alaska's.
SENATOR PASKVAN asked if passing SB 81 avoids a lawsuit being
filed.
MR. PUCKETT replied that he didn't know if it would make a
difference or not.
SENATOR DAVIS remarked that she believes if this bill does not
pass the opportunity to file a suit would present itself.
SENATOR PASKVAN moved to report SB 81 from committee with
individual recommendations and attached fiscal note(s). There
were no objections and it was so ordered.
2:10:05 PM
At ease from 2:10 to 2:20.
2:12:06 PM
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|