Legislature(2019 - 2020)BUTROVICH 205
03/29/2019 09:00 AM Senate EDUCATION
Note: the audio
and video
recordings are distinct records and are obtained from different sources. As such there may be key differences between the two. The audio recordings are captured by our records offices as the official record of the meeting and will have more accurate timestamps. Use the icons to switch between them.
| Audio | Topic |
|---|---|
| Start | |
| SB74 | |
| SJR9 | |
| Adjourn |
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
| + | TELECONFERENCED | ||
| += | SB 74 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| += | SJR 9 | TELECONFERENCED | |
SB 74-INTERNET FOR SCHOOLS
9:00:17 AM
CHAIR STEVENS announced the consideration of SB 74, Version M.
9:00:20 AM
SENATOR LYMAN HOFFMAN, Alaska State Legislature, Juneau, Alaska,
sponsor of SB 74, stated that he was available to answer any
additional questions that the committee may have.
9:00:53 AM
SENATOR HUGHES said that this is an important bill that will
help students across the state. The committee learned at the
last meeting that the ideal speed is 100 megabits of download
per second (Mbps). She expressed hope that as the bill moves
forward there would be consideration for stair stepping so that
over time as schools are ready and as the legislature has the
funding, they could increase their speed to 100 Mbps. This would
free the legislature of annual review of similar bills.
9:02:01 AM
PATIENCE FREDERICKSEN, Director, Division of Library, Archives,
and Museums, Department of Education and Early Development
(DEED), Juneau, Alaska, said the division would suggest
eliminating the proposed new text "a minimum of" because it is
vague and open to interpretation. For clarity it would be most
helpful to say, "bring the applicant's share to 25 megabits of
download a second [of the Internet services.]"
CHAIR STEVENS asked where that was located in the bill.
MS. FREDERICKSEN said the underlined phrase "a minimum of" is on
page 1, line 7. She explained that the phrase is problematic for
administration of the program and that it would be much clearer
to identify the applicant's share as 25 megabits a second.
CHAIR STEVENS said the committee will ask the sponsor to comment
on the suggestion. He asked if she had any comments about the
fiscal note.
MS. FREDERICKSEN replied that the fiscal note is written as
though the division could start the program right away but they
would suggest an effective date of September. She explained that
school districts have an E-rate filing window in the spring and
then they submit a grant application to the School Broadband
Assistance Grant (BAG) program. Those two applications have to
agree. The E-rate filing window closed two days ago. Therefore,
an effective date of September 2019 will give the division one
more year of School BAG program at 10 Mbps. Then July next year
the School BAG program would be 25 Mbps. If the effective date
is September, the $8,676,300 for the FY 2020 appropriation
request would not be needed. The governor's budget has
$1,487,500 for School BAG now and that will cover the cost for
FY 20 if the program is run at 10 Mbps. In FY 2021, the division
would need what is shown in the fiscal note. She explained that
starting the program is somewhat complicated and entails
revising regulations and grant applications and benchmarking
what schools pay for Internet to ensure equity among school
districts.
MS. FREDERICKSEN explained that for the fiscal note, DEED used a
Federal Communications Commission (FCC) list that shows that 245
schools had less than 25 Mbps at the end of February. The
average FY 2019 School BAG cost per school was $16,594. The
School Bag cost for 245 schools at 10 Mbps is $4,065,530 and the
proportional increase from 10 to 25 Mbps is just over $10
million. There are no positions associated with this program but
the cost of the E-rate consultant is added onto the contract.
That person does the lion's share of the review of the grant
applications and works with the school districts to ensure they
are eligible.
9:07:22 AM
SENATOR COSTELLO commented that the effective date issue seems
to be more programmatic than fiscal and could be left to the
Finance Committee to decide. The official record of this
conversation could include the legislative intent of how it
would best work for the program to go into effect.
CHAIR STEVENS asked the sponsor if he had any comment on DEED's
suggestion to strike the language "a minimum of" and instead
identify an applicant's share as 25 megabits of download a
second.
SENATOR HOFFMAN replied that he did not object to the conceptual
amendment.
SENATOR COSTELLO offered a conceptual amendment to SB 74,
Version M, to strike the words "a minimum of" on [page 1,] line
7.
CHAIR STEVENS found no objection and the conceptual amendment to
SB 74 was adopted.
9:09:11 AM
CHAIR STEVENS opened public testimony.
9:09:32 AM
DAVID GUTTENBERG, representing self, Fairbanks, Alaska, said the
committee heard quite a bit from education experts when SB 74
was introduced, but he believes that they minimized the impact
of bringing broadband to Alaska schools. He highlighted that the
bill seeks to bring broadband to students across the state, not
just rural schools. He pointed out that if more communities had
connectivity and sustainable high-speed broadband, then all of
Alaska would have significant increases in quality of life and
educational opportunities. Diversifying the economy would also
be more likely.
MR. GUTTENBERG referenced Senator Hughes' question about
industry regulation and said he doesn't understand why the
Regulatory Commission of Alaska (RCA) refuses to recognize that
the Internet is a telecommunication. The universal service fund
is a tax and the Alaska universal service fund is a tax, all of
which flows into a specific fund. But what's disturbing about
the situation in Alaska is that the demand for Internet is
escalating but there is no control of cost. Ms. Fredericksen
testified during the previous hearing that schools spend about
$145 million a year for Internet. He said the reports the
legislature told the RCA to produce on Internet are significant
with regard to broadband in Alaska. Billions of dollars of tax
money are going into Alaska for Internet infrastructure but
there is no infrastructure or no guiding hand that says Alaska
needs infrastructure, not just escalating costs. All the
reports, including the state's broadband task force, recommended
that there be a quasigovernmental entity to point out where the
efficiencies are to build out an infrastructure. Part of the
broadband task force report is that the estimated cost is $1.3
billion. That was about eight years ago, so it's probably higher
now. The point is that the billions of dollars in public funds
coming into Alaska now could pay for infrastructure if an entity
pointed out where Alaska lacks infrastructure not just for
schools but for telemedicine and public safety too. He
emphasized the need for the legislature to address this issue.
9:17:46 AM
DAVID NEES, representing self, Anchorage, Alaska, said the House
education task force discussed Internet broadband speed and the
concern that schools are just paying for operations and there is
no incentive to upgrade facilities. He cited several failed
efforts to improve Internet service in Alaska and agreed with
Mr. Guttenberg that the issue is lack of infrastructure, not
connectivity speed. He said no one has presented a proposal
about what would happen if fiber optics were installed in
schools. If it is going to be the schools' mission to do
distance delivery, it is a good idea to look at the broadband
report and decide on a way to do this. He suggested that this is
a basic unmet need that should be addressed by [the department
of] commerce or a similar entity. Increasing speed alone is not
the solution. He pointed out that a number of schools do not
meet the current minimum and raising that minimum won't change
anything. The access point is the problem. He said people are
subsidizing this and everyone would benefit from faster access.
That will take infrastructure.
9:20:11 AM
CHAIR STEVENS closed public testimony.
9:20:20 AM
SENATOR HUGHES moved to report SB 74, Version M as amended, from
committee with individual recommendations and accompanying
fiscal notes.
There was no objection and CSSB 74(EDC) moved from the Senate
Education Standing Committee.
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|---|---|
| 01_SB074_InternetBroadband_BillText_VersionM.PDF |
SEDC 3/29/2019 9:00:00 AM |
SB 74 |
| 02_SB074_InternetBroadband_SponsorStatement_VersionM.pdf |
SEDC 3/29/2019 9:00:00 AM |
SB 74 |
| 03_SB074_InternetBroadband_Sectional_VersionM.pdf |
SEDC 3/29/2019 9:00:00 AM |
SB 74 |
| 04_SB074_InternetBroadband_FiscalNote01_DEED_Libraries.pdf |
SEDC 3/29/2019 9:00:00 AM |
SB 74 |
| 05_SB074_InternetBroadband_Research_AlaskaStateLibrary_Broadband_Summary.pdf |
SEDC 3/29/2019 9:00:00 AM |
SB 74 |
| 06_SB074_InternetBroadband_Research_BroadbandGrantApplication.pdf |
SEDC 3/29/2019 9:00:00 AM |
SB 74 |
| 07_SB074_InternetBroadband_Research_Article_28Jan2019.pdf |
SEDC 3/29/2019 9:00:00 AM |
SB 74 |
| 08_SB074_InternetBroadband_Research_DistrictsUnder25mbs_2018-2019.pdf |
SEDC 3/29/2019 9:00:00 AM |
SB 74 |
| 09_SB074_InternetBroadband_Support_LPSD_28March2019.pdf |
SEDC 3/29/2019 9:00:00 AM |
SB 74 |
| 10_SB074_InternetBroadband_Support_GCI_28March2019.pdf |
SEDC 3/29/2019 9:00:00 AM |
SB 74 |