Legislature(2021 - 2022)SENATE FINANCE 532
02/01/2022 01:00 PM Senate FINANCE
Note: the audio
and video
recordings are distinct records and are obtained from different sources. As such there may be key differences between the two. The audio recordings are captured by our records offices as the official record of the meeting and will have more accurate timestamps. Use the icons to switch between them.
| Audio | Topic |
|---|---|
| Start | |
| SB72 | |
| SB62 | |
| Adjourn |
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
| + | SB 72 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | SB 62 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | TELECONFERENCED |
SENATE BILL NO. 72
"An Act relating to civics education, civics
examinations, and secondary school graduation
requirements; and providing for an effective date."
1:08:07 PM
SENATOR GARY STEVENS, SPONSOR, introduced the legislation.
He stressed the importance of civics education. He remarked
that there was a misunderstanding about the public process.
He felt that children needed to be educated to understand
what it meant to be a citizen of the country. He pointed
out that there was a recent history of apathy about the
civics process and involvement. He remarked that other
states had taken efforts to improve civics education. He
stated that there was a test for citizenship, that students
should have as a requirement.
Senator Hoffman wondered whether Senator Stevens had passed
that test.
Senator Stevens replied in the affirmative.
Senator Hoffman wondered whether everyone who ran for state
office should take the test.
Senator Stevens replied that it was beyond his purview.
Co-Chair Stedman looked at line 12, page 2 of the bill. He
wondered why the percentage requirement is 60 and not 70.
1:13:54 PM
TIM LAMKIN, STAFF, SENATOR GARY STEVENS, replied that the
number was chosen by the prior committees and noted that it
was a bare minimum passing grade, but stated that it could
have an amendment.
Co-Chair Stedman felt that a 70 percent score would be more
reasonable.
Senator Stevens deferred the subject to the commissioner of
the Department of Education and Early Development (DEED).
Senator Olson recalled that the exit exam was voted out of
the legislature a few years prior. He noted that he voted
it out, because there was an issue with how the questions
might be asked or framed without understanding the
different correct answers for the separate locations of the
state.
Senator Stevens replied that the exam was not intended as
an exit exam, so the intention was to learn in the exam.
Senator Olson pointed out that there would not be a second
exam issued unless the student had received a passing
score.
Senator Stevens agreed, and stressed that it was not a one-
shot test.
1:18:47 PM
Mr. Lamkin discussed the Sectional Analysis (copy on file):
Sec. 1: AS 14.03.076, relating to public schools, adds
a new section
a. directing the State Board of Education and
Early Development (SBOE) to develop curriculum
and a related assessment based on the civics
portion of the naturalization examination
administered by the U.S. Department of Homeland
Security for immigrants seeking U.S. citizenship.
The curriculum and assessment must also include
systems of Alaska Tribal government;
b. requiring students to pass the assessment
established in (a) above in order to receive a
high school diploma, with exceptions for students
with a disability and who receive a waiver from
their local school board;
c. schools are to document on student transcripts
when a student has passed the assessment, with
the option for the student to retake the
assessment;
d. districts are required to report annually on
their respective civics course offerings and
overall average student score on the assessment;
and
e. a passing score is defined as correctly
answering 60 percent or more on the civics
assessment.
Section 2: AS 14.07.168, relating to reporting
requirements of the SBOE, to include in their annual
report to the legislature a description of civics
education curriculum in the state, of civics-related
course offerings in respective districts, and of
student performance on the assessment described in
section 1, by district.
Section 3: Provides for an effective date of July 1,
2022.
Senator Olson queried the efforts of the short period of
time until the effective date.
Senator Stevens deferred to DEED.
Co-Chair Bishop queried a plan to interface with tribal
governments.
Mr. Lamkin replied that there was a support from Alaska
Native organizations, and were ready to have participation.
1:23:49 PM
MICHAEL JOHNSON, COMMISSIONER, DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION AND
EARLY DEVELOPMENT, spoke in support of the legislation. He
pointed out the lack of knowledge of U.S. civics, and noted
that people 45 years old or older scored much higher than
those under the age of 45. He stressed the importance of
tribal government and affairs education, so there could be
Alaska-specific education. He felt that it was a much
needed effort to repair the system, but would not be a fix
all.
Senator Hoffman recalled that he knew someone who became a
U.S. citizen in their nineties with a score of 100 percent.
1:30:36 PM
Co-Chair Bishop asked about the involvement with tribal
organizations to build the curriculum in time for the
effective date.
Commissioner Johnson stated that a curriculum had been
introduced by First Alaskans Institute that could be
incorporated into the exam.
Co-Chair Stedman wondered how many schools in the state
taught Alaska history.
Commissioner Johnson agreed to provide that information.
Co-Chair Bishop OPENED public testimony.
1:33:52 PM
AMBER VASKA, EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR OF TRIBAL GOVERNMENT AND
CLIENT SERVICES, TANANA CHIEFS CONFERENCE, ALASKA REGIONAL
COALITION, FAIRBANKS (via teleconference), spoke in support
of the bill.
Co-Chair Bishop CLOSED public testimony.
Co-Chair Stedman wondered whether the test would be
multiple choice.
Senator Stevens replied in the affirmative.
Senator Wielechowski wondered whether districts that
already a civics curriculum had would need to redesign
their curriculum.
Senator Stevens replied that there would not be an
expectation of districts to rewrite curriculum, but rather
it would be universal across the state.
1:40:40 PM
Senator Wielechowski asked how and when the exam would be
taken.
Senator Stevens replied that the test would not be an exit
exam, but rather an attempt to ensure civics exposure
education.
Mr. Lamkin stated that every district had social studies
requirements, but perhaps not specifically civics
education.
1:41:57 PM
AT EASE
1:42:07 PM
RECONVENED
1:42:25 PM
Co-Chair Bishop announced that the deadline for amendments
would be Friday, February 4 at 4pm.
SB 72 was HEARD and HELD in committee for further
consideration.
1:43:07 PM
AT EASE
1:45:36 PM
RECONVENED
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|---|---|
| SB072_Civics_Research_128-Test-Questions.pdf |
SEDC 3/10/2021 9:00:00 AM SFIN 2/1/2022 1:00:00 PM |
SB 72 |
| SB072_Civics_Research_Forbes_NeglectingCivics_21Feb2020.pdf |
SFIN 2/1/2022 1:00:00 PM |
SB 72 |
| SB072_Civics_Research_Links-to-Resources.pdf |
SEDC 3/10/2021 9:00:00 AM SFIN 2/1/2022 1:00:00 PM |
SB 72 |
| SB072_Civics_Research_RAND_Focus-on-Civic-Ed_08Dec2020.pdf |
SEDC 3/10/2021 9:00:00 AM SFIN 2/1/2022 1:00:00 PM |
SB 72 |
| SB072_Civics_Research_WSJ_02March2021.pdf |
SEDC 3/10/2021 9:00:00 AM SFIN 2/1/2022 1:00:00 PM |
SB 72 |
| SB 72 Sponsor Statement Feb 2021.pdf |
SCRA 3/30/2021 3:30:00 PM SFIN 2/1/2022 1:00:00 PM |
SB 72 |
| SB 72 Summary of Changes Version A to I.pdf |
SCRA 3/30/2021 3:30:00 PM SFIN 2/1/2022 1:00:00 PM |
SB 72 |
| SB 72 Civics_Summary-of-Changes_Version i to N.pdf |
SFIN 2/1/2022 1:00:00 PM |
SB 72 |
| SB 62 Sponsor Statement 1.28.2021.pdf |
SFIN 2/1/2022 1:00:00 PM SFIN 3/18/2022 9:00:00 AM SRES 3/10/2021 3:30:00 PM |
SB 62 |
| SB 62 SFIN DNR Gas Leases; Renewable Energy Grant 2.1.22.pdf |
SFIN 2/1/2022 1:00:00 PM SFIN 3/18/2022 9:00:00 AM |
SB 62 |
| SB 72 Civics_Sectional_version N.pdf |
SFIN 2/1/2022 1:00:00 PM |
SB 72 |
| SB 72 2.1.2022 (S) FIN Hearing DEED Follow-Up.pdf |
SFIN 2/1/2022 1:00:00 PM SFIN 2/8/2022 1:00:00 PM |
SB 72 |
| SB 62 DNR 2022-02-17_SB62_SFIN Response to Questions.pdf |
SFIN 2/1/2022 1:00:00 PM |
SB 62 |