Legislature(2009 - 2010)HOUSE FINANCE 519
04/18/2009 08:30 AM House FINANCE
| Audio | Topic |
|---|---|
| Start | |
| SB116 | |
| SB125 | |
| HB36 | |
| HB157 | |
| SB72 | |
| Adjourn |
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
| + | SB 116 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | SB 125 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | HB 36 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | SB 72 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | HB 157 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | TELECONFERENCED |
CS FOR SENATE BILL NO. 72(STA)
"An Act relating to use of child safety seats and seat
belts."
10:37:03 AM
SENATOR HOLLIS FRENCH, SPONSOR, explained the legislation.
He stated that he bill would bring in $200,000 in federal
funds to help people afford the booster seats that are
necessary under law. He said that the current statute was
in need of articulation. The bill breaks the statute into
five parts. He referred to a handout with pictures
explaining the different sections of the bill. Section 1
applies to children under one year; Section 2 applies to
children one year to four years. Section 3 applies to
children over four years, but under eight years. Section 4
applies to children who exceed the height/weight
requirements in Section 3, and Section 5 is a catch-all
provision, which allows the driver to determine whether a
booster seat or a car seat should be used.
10:39:39 AM
Co-Chair Stoltze opened public testimony.
RONNIE SULLIVAN, EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICE PROVIDER
testified via teleconference, spoke in support of the
legislation. She felt that the bill would reduce confusion
when deciding the best type of safety seat for a child.
JANE FELLMAN, COORDINATOR, SAFE KIDS, KENAI testified via
teleconference, testified in support of the bill. She
emphasized the importance of the safety of children in
cars. She described the level of protection provided by
boosters and car seats. She relayed a story of children who
did not fit in the seat belts and who needed bolsters. She
stated the need for both education and legislation.
10:44:54 AM
JOHN COOK, LEGISLATIVE DIRECTOR, ALASKA AUTO DEALERS
ASSOCIATION testified via teleconference, urged passage of
the legislation. He felt that the current law was vague and
outdated and did not address the needs of children four to
eight years of age. He stated that many states have updated
child restraint laws. He described broad-based support for
the legislation.
MARGARET HAYASHI, EMERGENCY AND CRITICAL CARE NURSE,
testified via teleconference, spoke in support of the bill.
She stressed that current law was outdated. She stated that
two children in her community had died in the past year
because they had not been properly restrained.
10:49:26 AM
JANICE TOWER, ALASKA CHAPTER OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF
PEDIATRICS, testified via teleconference, testified in
support of the legislation. Alaska's pediatricians are
willing to educate citizens regarding the issue. She urged
timely passage to receive the federal funds.
GORDON GLASER, CARSEAT TASKFORCE AND INJURY PREVENTION,
testified via teleconference, urged committee support for
the legislation. He shared that the single leading cause of
death and the second leading cause of hospitalization of
children four to eight years old is motor vehicle
accidents. None of the children who were hospitalized were
properly restrained in booster seats.
10:53:20 AM
TIM LAMKIN, CONCERNED PARENT, spoke in opposition of the
legislation. He felt that the bill was of being poorly
written and was not good policy. He explained Anton's Law,
which established improved safety ratings for
manufacturers, and improved law enforcement of safety seat
laws. He felt that it was important that no loopholes could
be found in the legislation. He expressed confusion for the
purpose of booster seats for eight year old children over
80 lbs. He felt that there could be situation where
children over the required booster age limit, but under the
weight requirement, would be expected to sit in a booster
seat. He stressed that he supported the intent of the bill
in keeping children safe, but felt that it was a poorly
written policy.
11:00:01 AM
Co-Chair Stoltze closed public testimony.
Representative Kelly asked why the provision could not be
simplified. Senator French stated that the intent was to
work with experts from the American Academy of Pediatrics
and the National Highway Transportation Safety
Administration to adopt language that clearly expressed
intent. He furthered that Section 5 is in the bill for a
reason, to protect young people up to age 16. Dropping the
section, without a major re-write of the bill, would make
the bill unclear.
11:03:56 AM
Representative Kelly asked why the height requirement was
insufficient. He wondered about the last line on page 2,
"determined solely by the driver". Mr. French no objection
to clarifying the language on page 2. He emphasized that
the bill saves lives and raises money. He said that the
experts think that the weight requirements should be on
statute.
Representative Kelly asked if federal dollars would be lost
if the weight requirement was removed from the bill. Mr.
French replied yes. Representative Kelly clarified that the
weight limit was a federal requirement. Mr. French replied
in the affirmative. Representative Kelly asked what the
weight requirement was. Mr. French answered that it was 65
lbs.
11:06:51 AM
Co-Chair Hawker voiced concern about ambiguity in the
language in Section 5. He thought that the provision could
result in undue fear of police officers for children.
Vice-Chair Thomas shared a negative experience with money
obtained for a seat belt law in his district. He also
expressed concern for 15 year old children, who do not meet
the weight requirements, but do meet the height
requirements, being expected to ride in booster seats. He
thought they would be unduly stigmatized.
11:12:08 AM
Senator French said that the example would fall under
Section 5.
Representative Fairclough requested confirmation that the
65 lb limit would comply with federal law.
MARY SIROKY, SPECIAL ASSISTANT, DEPARTMENT OF
TRANSPORTATION AND PUBLIC FACILITIES, replied that that was
her understanding.
Representative Fairclough asked if the sponsor was in
opposition to the amendment that would change the weight
requirement from 80 to 65. Senator French replied no.
Representative Fairclough asked if there was a choice
between the height and weight requirements. Ms. Siroky
replied that the height and weight requirements must be
included in statute in order to receive the federal funds.
11:15:11 AM
Representative Kelly asked if Section 5 gave parents
control in determining the use of child restraints for
children over eight and under 16 years of age. Ms. Siroky
replied that that was correct. Representative Kelly
requested further clarification. Ms. Siroky thought that
federal height and weight requirements must be met.
11:16:51 AM
Representative Kelly asked if the language stated, "height
and weight" or "height or weight". Mr. Lamkin interpreted
that the requirement was for children to be over 65 lbs or
over 4' 9".
Representative Fairclough queried the document Mr. Lamkin
was reading information from. Mr. Lamkin replied that it
was the grant requirement under federal law.
Representative Fairclough pointed out that a grant
requirement is different from federal law. She wondered if
a federal code could be cited. Mr. Lamkin said that
according to Anton's Law, there is no federal height or
weight requirement.
11:19:58 AM
GORDON GLASER testified via teleconference, reported that
the language states that both height and weight
requirements must be met, under Anton's Law, in order to
meet federal funding requirements.
Representative Austerman asked if the testifier was an
attorney. Mr. Glaser said he was not.
11:22:00 AM
Vice-Chair Thomas MOVED to ADOPT Amendment 1:
Page 2, Line 11:
Delete: "80"
Insert: "65"
Co-Chair Stoltze objected for discussion.
Co-Chair Stoltze withdrew his OBJECTION. There being NO
OBJECTION, it was so ordered.
11:23:04 AM
Vice-Chair Thomas MOVED Amendment 2:
Page 2, Lines 18-23
Delete all material
Co-Chair Stoltze objected for discussion.
Representative Gara thought that Lines 18 through 23
clarified the language of the bill.
11:24:09 AM
Senator French reported that the same amendment was voted
down in another committee. He explained that the amendment
has legal drafting problems.
11:25:43 AM
Co-Chair Hawker commented that deleting the lines would
resolve the intent of the amendment.
Representative Kelly suggested a legal opinion from the
Department of Law.
11:26:36 AM
Representative Gara asked the committee to consider moving
the bill out of committee and resolving the semantic matter
on the Floor.
Representative Gara maintained a continued OBJECTION to
Amendment 2.
A roll call vote was taken on the motion to ADOPT Amendment
2.
IN FAVOR: Thomas, Hawker
OPPOSED: Gara, Kelly, Austerman, Crawford, Salmon, Stoltze,
Fairclough
Representative Foster and Representative Joule were absent
from the vote.
The MOTION FAILED (7-2).
11:29:57 AM
Representative Kelly MOVED to ADOPT Conceptual Amendment 3:
Page 2, Line 23:
In between "determined" and "by"
Insert: "solely"
There being NO OBJECTION, it was so ordered.
11:30:17 AM
Representative Fairclough pointed out the continued
argument between "and" and "or", in the height and weight
requirement language of the bill.
Vice-Chair Thomas revisited his comment concerning the
money that had been theoretically going to his district for
mandatory seatbelts laws. He expressed frustration with the
negative impact of not receiving those funds. He felt that
if the bill would force families in rural areas to but
boosters for their children, the state should help finance
the booster seats.
Co-Chair Stoltze commented on the fiscal notes.
11:32:41 AM
Representative Gara MOVED to report HCS CSSB 72(FIN) out of
Committee with individual recommendations and the
accompanying fiscal note. There being NO OBJECTION, it was
so ordered.
HCS CSSB 72(FIN) was REPORTED out of Committee with no
recommendation and attached zero note 1 by the Department
of Transportation and Public Facilities.
11:33:08 AM RECESSED TO THE CALL OF THE CHAIR
10:15:37 PM RECONVENED
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|---|---|
| 02__Sponsor_Statement_HB157_Exempt_13Mar09[1].doc |
HFIN 4/18/2009 8:30:00 AM |
HB 157 |
| 03__HB_157_-_legislative-report-on-retiree-return-program-2-6-09.pdf |
HFIN 4/18/2009 8:30:00 AM |
HB 157 |
| HB036-OOG-LtGOV-4-17-09.pdf |
HFIN 4/18/2009 8:30:00 AM HFIN 3/15/2010 1:30:00 PM HFIN 3/16/2010 9:00:00 AM |
HB 36 |
| 07 HB36 Legal Opinions.pdf |
HFIN 4/18/2009 8:30:00 AM HFIN 2/8/2010 1:30:00 PM HFIN 3/15/2010 1:30:00 PM HFIN 3/16/2010 9:00:00 AM |
HB 36 |
| 08 HB36 Back up.pdf |
HFIN 4/18/2009 8:30:00 AM HFIN 3/15/2010 1:30:00 PM HFIN 3/16/2010 9:00:00 AM |
HB 36 |
| SB 125 Sponsor Statement (S FIN).pdf |
HFIN 4/18/2009 8:30:00 AM |
SB 125 |
| SB 125 Letter of Support.pdf |
HFIN 4/18/2009 8:30:00 AM |
SB 125 |
| Alaska Heating Assistance Programs.ppt |
HFIN 4/18/2009 8:30:00 AM |
SB 116 |
| ANHB Support Letter.pdf |
HFIN 4/18/2009 8:30:00 AM |
SB 116 |
| AVERAGE MONTHLY TEMPERATURES FOR BETHEL ALASKA.doc |
HFIN 4/18/2009 8:30:00 AM |
SB 116 |
| SB 116 - gallons by comunity.xls |
HFIN 4/18/2009 8:30:00 AM |
SB 116 |
| CSHB 157 (FIN) Version S.pdf |
HFIN 4/18/2009 8:30:00 AM |
HB 157 |
| SB 125 Talking Points Sen. Paskvan.pdf |
HFIN 4/18/2009 8:30:00 AM |
SB 125 |
| SB 72 HFC Amendment 1 and 2.pdf |
HFIN 4/18/2009 8:30:00 AM |
SB 72 |
| SB72AAPSupportLetter.pdf |
HFIN 4/18/2009 8:30:00 AM |
SB 72 |
| SB72ABINSupportLetter.pdf |
HFIN 4/18/2009 8:30:00 AM |
SB 72 |
| SB72Changes.PDF |
HFIN 4/18/2009 8:30:00 AM |
SB 72 |
| SB72Chart.pdf |
HFIN 4/18/2009 8:30:00 AM |
SB 72 |
| SB72OtherStates.pdf |
HFIN 4/18/2009 8:30:00 AM |
SB 72 |
| SB72Sponsor.pdf |
HFIN 4/18/2009 8:30:00 AM |
SB 72 |
| Senate Bill 116 Sponsor Statement.doc |
HFIN 4/18/2009 8:30:00 AM |
SB 116 |
| SSHB 36 Hearing Request Sponsor Statement.pdf |
HFIN 4/18/2009 8:30:00 AM HFIN 3/15/2010 1:30:00 PM HFIN 3/16/2010 9:00:00 AM |
HB 36 |
| SSHB 36 Hearing Request Sectional Analysis.pdf |
HFIN 4/18/2009 8:30:00 AM HFIN 3/15/2010 1:30:00 PM HFIN 3/16/2010 9:00:00 AM |
HB 36 |
| SSHB 36 Hearing Request Backup.pdf |
HFIN 4/18/2009 8:30:00 AM HFIN 3/16/2010 9:00:00 AM |
HB 36 |