Legislature(2003 - 2004)
03/03/2004 03:30 PM Senate RES
| Audio | Topic |
|---|
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
SB 70-BD OF FISHERIES MEETINGS/EMERGENCY ORDERS
VICE CHAIR THOMAS WAGONER called the Senate Resources Standing
Committee meeting to order at 3:30 p.m. Present were Senators
Ben Stevens, Fred Dyson, Ralph Seekins, Kim Elton and Vice Chair
Thomas Wagoner. Senator Georgianna Lincoln arrived at 3:36 and
Chair Scott Ogan arrived at 5:05. The first order of business to
come before the committee was SB 70.
VICE-CHAIR WAGONER said that no testimony would be taken on SB
70, but a letter from Commissioner Duffy would be read into the
record.
MS. AMY SEITZ, staff to Senator Wagoner read the letter:
Thank you for your February 23 letter requesting a
written statement of my authority as commissioner to
issue emergency orders under AS 16.05.060. As stated
in your letter, there has been some discussion about
whether section 2 of SB 70, an act relating to the
emergency order authority of the commissioner of [the
Department of] Fish and Game and to meetings of the
Board of Fisheries, it would expand the commissioner's
EO [executive order] authority to supersede a
regulatory decision adopted by the Board of Fisheries.
The scope of the commissioner's authority to issue an
EO that contravenes a management plan adopted by the
Board of Fisheries was addressed by the Alaska Supreme
Court in Peninsula Marketing Association (PMA) versus
Roper.
The Department of Law has advised me that under the
PMA case, EO authority includes the authority to
override a board-adopted management plan, but only if,
in the judgment of the commissioner or his delegate,
doing so is justified by new information or events
that have arisen since the time of the board's
decision.
Section 2 of SB 70 authorizes the commissioner to, on
the basis of new information, supersede a regulatory
decision of the Board of Fisheries by means of an
emergency order. I consider that to be a restatement
of authority that is already vested in the
commissioner under the current version of AS 16.05.060
and the PMA case. Accordingly, I do not consider
section 2 of SB 70 to expand the commissioner's EO
authority. I trust this response to your enquiry and I
would be happy to provide additional information that
might be helpful to your work on the fish and game
issues.
Sincerely,
Kevin C. Duffy, Commissioner
VICE CHAIR WAGONER commented that the letter speaks for itself.
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|