Legislature(1995 - 1996)
02/22/1995 03:50 PM Senate RES
| Audio | Topic |
|---|
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
SRES 2/22/95
SB 69 REPORTING OF HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCE
Number 001
CHAIRMAN LEMAN called the Senate Resources Committee meeting to
order at 3:50 p.m. and announced SB 69 to be up for consideration.
ANNETTE KREITZER, Resources Committee Aide, explained that SB 69 is
not a new idea. The State Emergency Response Commission first
considered this back in 1987-88. Currently there are two
placarding programs; one is under Title 18 done by the State Fire
Marshal's office which has placarded 14 sites outside the
Municipality of Anchorage and under Title 29 which allows
municipalities to have their own placarding program.
SB 69 would allow the continuance of the Title 29 placarding
program, but it would delete the State Fire Marshal's placarding
program. It would also create a single application form of 4 pages
taken from the current EPA Tier II form.
PEGGY GOODSTEIN, ARCO Alaska, testified in support of SB 69 which,
she said, is a real improvement in chemical reporting. It will
simplify regulations and reduce costs while still providing
protection for emergency response personnel and the community.
CHESTER WEGER, Acting Director, Division of Fire Prevention, said
he would answer their questions.
SENATOR HALFORD commented on the fact that the existing law allows
a municipality to require reporting in lesser quantities than the
State law and asked him if any municipalities had done that. MR.
WEGER answered that the only municipality that has their own
program is Anchorage. Their reporting quantities are the same as
the state law. Removing that authority wouldn't have an effect on
any existing requirement. He said the current program that has
been in effect since 1987 is not working.
SENATOR LEMAN asked why there were only 14 sites placarded. MR.
WEGER answered that the primary reason is that they don't have the
enforcement personnel to enforce the program.
RITA VENTA, Anchorage Fire Department, said she is the
Administrator of the Community Right-to-Know Program for the
Municipality of Anchorage. She said 730 businesses participate in
their program and she said their placarding program is 95%
effective. She said she didn't have a problem with the
standardized Tier II form. It is important to their patrons in
Anchorage and to fire prevention to be able to maintain their
reporting requirements. She noted that their requirements are the
same as state requirements, but those are more stringent than
federal requirements.
The teleconference connection broke at this point and Ms. Venta was
disconnected.
Number 160
MS. KREITZER clarified that SB 69 would require a change in the
Anchorage program. The change is on page 2, lines 27 and 28 where
it deletes "a consumer commodity of a hazardous material in the
quantity of more than 1,000 lbs" and the reason is it covers
facilities like K-Mart or Wal-Mart where there are large quantities
of fertilizers and paint remover, etc. Fire departments readily
acknowledge that it is easy to recognize that these stores those
kinds of things.
Number 211
SENATOR FRANK asked what a placard does. MS. KREITZER said it's
purpose is warn first responders and fire fighters that there is a
hazard in the building. There have been additional federal
requirements for reporting and facilities must now report directly
to fire departments and to local emergency planning committees. It
brings about the question of whether there is a need for this
redundant program of marking with a placard when fire departments
go in and do pre-fire planning surveys.
Basically, she said, this bill is attempting to bring about one
form for four reporting requirements - Emergency Planning,
Community Right-to-Know, the Fire Marshal, and handling the
municipality placarding in Title 29. She said the placard goes on
the outside of a building.
Number 256
MS. VENTA commented that the placarding program works very well for
them and it is used for above ground fuel storage, but is not
needed for underground tanks. She felt it was important to keep
hazardous waste and acute hazardous waste listed in the bill. Even
though they are regulated in other areas, it is important to know
those items are on-site, especially if they are in large
quantities.
She had no problem with dropping the consumer commodity reporting
requirement of 1,000 lbs. The state and municipality requirements
are significantly lower than EPA's. For most things it is 500 lbs.
and for EPA it's 10,000 lbs.
SENATOR FRANK commented that was a big difference. MS. VENTA
explained that there were no federal requirements when Anchorage
and the State set their requirement figures.
MS. KREITZER said in writing this legislation the working group
attempted first of all to agree on what was to be reported and to
try to get the same things reported under all the different laws.
Secondly, they addressed the question of quantities.
SENATOR LINCOLN noted that while the Alaska Local Emergency
Planning Committee Association supports the legislation, they
listed five areas as suggestions for compromise. She asked if any
of those were in the bill or was there any thought to incorporate
those items in the bill. She didn't know for sure if exempting
facilities out of a public fire response jurisdiction would help
the smaller communities or tie their hands further. She said these
concerns could be addressed at a later meeting.
MS. KREITZER explained regarding exempting facilities, unless a
city elected to begin a placarding program, they are exempt. The
repeal of AS 18.73.10 does this and on page 2, line 6.
MS. VENTA came back on line and responding to a question listed
some of the hazardous substances currently reported like gasoline,
diesel, paint thinners, solvents, etc.. She mentioned that in
Anchorage there are a number of radio active sites.
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|