Legislature(2025 - 2026)BELTZ 105 (TSBldg)
03/13/2025 03:30 PM Senate STATE AFFAIRS
Note: the audio
and video
recordings are distinct records and are obtained from different sources. As such there may be key differences between the two. The audio recordings are captured by our records offices as the official record of the meeting and will have more accurate timestamps. Use the icons to switch between them.
| Audio | Topic |
|---|---|
| Start | |
| SB64 | |
| SB49 | |
| Adjourn |
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
| += | SB 64 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| *+ | SB 49 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| *+ | SB 120 | TELECONFERENCED | |
SB 64-ELECTIONS
3:31:53 PM
CHAIR KAWASAKI announced the consideration of SENATE BILL NO. 64
"An Act relating to elections; relating to voters; relating to
voting; relating to voter preregistration for minors at least 16
years of age; relating to voter registration; relating to the
Alaska Public Offices Commission; relating to synthetic media in
electioneering communications; relating to campaign signs;
relating to public official financial disclosures; relating to
the crime of unlawful interference with voting in the first
degree; and providing for an effective date."
On March 11, 2025, the committee adopted a committee substitute
(CS), version H, as the working document.
3:32:39 PM
DAVID DUNSMORE, Staff, Senator Bill Wielechowski, Alaska State
Legislature, Juneau, Alaska, stated that SB 64 is the omnibus
election package from the Senate Rules Committee and the
previously adopted committee substitute is the working document.
3:33:36 PM
SENATOR WIELECHOWSKI asked Director Beecher to state the
concerns the Division of Elections has regarding SB 64. He said
his office has been struggling to find a way to adequately and
successfully track ballots without spending a lot of money.
3:33:30 PM
CAROL BEECHER, Director, Division of Elections, Anchorage,
Alaska, provided the divisions three concerns with SB 64. The
first concern is ballot tracking. She said the division has
heard of new technologies that might allow for tracking ballots
in transit between other states and Alaska but currently lacks
that capability to track an envelope during its entire journey.
While outgoing ballot envelopes have barcodes, there is no
system in place to track its return. She said Alaska's mail must
route through the Anchorage hub to have the postal code read;
rural post offices can't read postal codes. Ballots can't be
tracked like Amazon packages; the divisions technology isn't
capable of that.
3:36:55 PM
SENATOR WIELECHOWSKI asked if the division can achieve the same
ability as Anchorage, where a person can check the status of
their ballot online.
3:37:10 PM
MS. BEECHER answered that the division currently has the
capability for voters to go online and see if their ballot was
received but that's the extent of what the division can do.
3:37:39 PM
SENATOR WIELECHOWSKI asked what other concerns the division has
concerning SB 64.
3:37:47 PM
MS. BEECHER stated that another concern would be another part of
ballot curing found in Section 41, page 21. The division's
voting system doesn't show when a voter certificate is reviewed
or if a ballot has been counted. Ballots are reviewed by boards
and put through a series of different codes. The public list
shows a time and date stamp once the ballot has been counted and
the public list will only show if a ballot was fully counted,
partially counted, or rejected.
3:39:33 PM
CHAIR KAWASAKI read the six items located in Section 41, page
21. He said these are the six items the ballot tracking system
would allow a voter to do:
[Original punctuation provided.]
• Confirm that the voter's ballot has been sent by
the division;
• Track the date of the ballot's delivery to the
voter;
• Confirm the division's receipt of the voter's
ballot;
• Determine whether the voter's certificate has
been reviewed;
• Determine whether the voter's ballot has been
counted; and
• Provide the information necessary to cure a
rejected ballot.
He stated that some of these elements are doable, and some would
be a problem or maybe impossible to do.
3:40:18 PM
MS. BEECHER said another concern was regarding Section 25, on
page 13, and raises a question about whether the ranking result
requirements also apply to hand counts. The division is
interpreting this as asking if poll workers in hand-count
precincts are expected to report all rankings on election night.
She said the division's last concern is Section 26, on page 14,
and may need further discussion with the Division to determine
what data level is truly useful to the public. She said too much
information or detail at a precinct level may risk voter
privacy.
3:42:19 PM
SENATOR BJORKMAN asked what precinct level data the division
would be concerned with.
3:42:38 PM
MS. BEECHER answered that when you are reporting detailed count
codes, like partial rejections, at the precinct level it can
risk voter privacy. She said with tiny precincts it's easier for
IT individuals to analyze data and infer how the entire precinct
had voted. Many states limit reporting to the house district
level to protect voter anonymity.
3:44:05 PM
SENATOR BJORKMAN stated he is not understanding what the codes
are, what the codes mean and the concern about releasing data.
He asked Ms. Beecher to talk offline for more clarity.
3:44:46 PM
SENATOR WIELECHOWSKI stated that the current version of SB 64 is
not the final bill. He said his office has heard the concerns
from constituents about same day voter registration and the
synthetic media provision that was removed. The committee will
continue to work on ballot tracking and solutions that will best
accommodate everyone.
3:46:00 PM
SENATOR YUNDT said he wasn't aware that the synthetic media
portion of the bill was removed and asked for an explanation.
3:46:25 PM
MR. DUNSMORE answered that the synthetic media portion of SB 64
was removed at the last committee meeting with version H. He
said there is discussion about possibly reintroducing parts of
the synthetic media portion that protects broadcasters from
unnecessary liability.
3:47:13 PM
CHAIR KAWASAKI explained that the committee removed the
synthetic media provision because the provision had less to do
with elections than other items. There's currently an artificial
intelligence (AI) task force and other bills addressing AI. He
said there is an interest within the committee in revisiting
synthetic media provision for SB 64.
3:48:17 PM
CHAIR KAWASAKI opened public testimony on SB 64.
3:48:47 PM
AYDEN NICHOL, Democracy Fellow, The Alaska Center, Anchorage,
Alaska, testified in support of SB 64:
[Original punctuation provided.]
Alongside protecting our air and water and producing
clean energy, building a strong democracy is an
important part of our work toward a sustainable and
just Alaska.
As you know, the state has a longstanding track record
of failing to protect the right to vote in rural
areas. Routinely, polling places open late or fail
to open entirely. Post office closures and delays
prevent ballots cast on-time from being counted.
Ballots are discarded without giving voters the
opportunity to correct mistakes.
Fortunately, many of the provisions in Senate Bill 64
would address these failures. We are particularly
encouraged by the proposed addition of a rural
community liaison to make sure that the Division of
Elections is addressing rural voters' needs.
But while we support the passage of this bill, we also
believe that it may go further to protect Alaskans'
voting rights. House Bill 43, introduced by
Representative Schrage, holds a provision that would
begin early voting 30 days before the election, rather
than the current 15 days. We can't, in one session,
address the huge array of logistical challenges that
delay and prevent rural voting, but we can give voters
and the Division more time to respond as they arise.
The more time they have, the less likely it is that a
properly-cast ballot will go uncounted.
We urge you to work to make sure that this provision
is included in the final version of the bill. And we
appreciate your hard work to make sure that every
Alaskan's vote is counted in every election.
3:50:51 PM
DONNA GOLDSMITH, representing self, Anchorage, Alaska, testified
in support of SB 64 and stated that voting is a fundamental
right and civic duty. SB 64 strengthens that right by removing
key barriers by:
• Allowing same-day registration
• Eliminating the outdated witness signature requirement-
which caused hundreds of ballots to be voided in the last
election for no rational reason
• Providing a ballot curing process
• Including prepaid return envelopes
SB 64 makes voting more accessible and ensures more voices are
heard.
3:52:37 PM
MARLENE WATSON, representing self, Anchorage, Alaska, testified
in support of SB 64 and agreed with the previous testifier. She
stated her belief that special needs ballots should not be
thrown out because of mistakes made by election officials,
creating a recurring absentee voter base list would reduce the
number of mail-in ballot applications and appointing a community
liaison would help elections run smoother in rural areas.
3:54:04 PM
LINDA MORNING, representing self, Kenai, Alaska, testified in
support of SB 64 and agreed with the previous testifiers.
3:56:04 PM
SENATOR WIELECHOWSKI stated that his office supports and wants
the witness verification system, but the state cant afford a $5
million dollar system right now.
3:57:31 PM
CHAIR KAWASAKI held SB 64 in committee.
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|---|---|
| SB 49 Version N 1.22.25.pdf |
SSTA 3/13/2025 3:30:00 PM |
SB 49 |
| SB 49 Sponsor Statement Version N 2.19.25.pdf |
SSTA 3/13/2025 3:30:00 PM |
SB 49 |
| SB 49 Sectional Analysis Version N 2.19.25.pdf |
SSTA 3/13/2025 3:30:00 PM |
SB 49 |
| SB 49 Research- Utah WVPO law Fiscal Note 2023.pdf |
SSTA 3/13/2025 3:30:00 PM |
SB 49 |
| SB 49 Research- Utah WVPO law 2023.pdf |
SSTA 3/13/2025 3:30:00 PM |
SB 49 |
| SB 49 Research- BJS Indicators of Workplace Violence 2019.pdf |
SSTA 3/13/2025 3:30:00 PM |
SB 49 |
| SB 49 Research - State Laws on Workplace Restraining Orders 9.1.2015.pdf |
SSTA 3/13/2025 3:30:00 PM |
SB 49 |
| SB049-JUD-ACS-03-07-25.pdf |
SSTA 3/13/2025 3:30:00 PM |
SB 49 |
| SB0120A.pdf |
SSTA 3/13/2025 3:30:00 PM |
SB 120 |
| SB120 Climate Change Commission Sponsor.pdf |
SSTA 3/13/2025 3:30:00 PM |
SB 120 |
| SB120 Climate Change Commission Sectional Analysis.pdf |
SSTA 3/13/2025 3:30:00 PM |
SB 120 |
| SB 120 Ltr of Opposition.pdf |
SSTA 3/13/2025 3:30:00 PM |
SB 120 |