Legislature(2025 - 2026)BELTZ 105 (TSBldg)
02/04/2025 03:30 PM Senate STATE AFFAIRS
Note: the audio
and video
recordings are distinct records and are obtained from different sources. As such there may be key differences between the two. The audio recordings are captured by our records offices as the official record of the meeting and will have more accurate timestamps. Use the icons to switch between them.
| Audio | Topic |
|---|---|
| Start | |
| HJR4 | |
| SB64 | |
| SB70 | |
| SB52 | |
| Adjourn |
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
| += | HJR 4 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| += | SB 64 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| += | SB 70 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| += | SB 52 | TELECONFERENCED | |
SB 64-ELECTIONS
3:35:11 PM
CHAIR KAWASAKI reconvened the meeting and announced the
consideration of SENATE BILL NO. 64 "An Act relating to
elections; relating to voters; relating to voting; relating to
voter preregistration for minors at least 16 years of age;
relating to voter registration; relating to the Alaska Public
Offices Commission; relating to synthetic media in
electioneering communications; relating to campaign signs;
relating to public official financial disclosures; relating to
the crime of unlawful interference with voting in the first
degree; and providing for an effective date."
3:35:43 PM
CHAIR KAWASAKI opened public testimony on SB 64.
3:36:03 PM
SUE SHERRIF, President, League of Women Voters of Alaska
(LWVAK), Fairbanks, Alaska, testified in support of SB 64. She
read the following written testimony:
[Original punctuation provided.]
We highlight three provisions of the bill that will
offer the State Division of Elections means of
improving the likelihood that a citizen's vote will be
counted at relatively low or no cost to the State:
1.Prepaid postage for absentee and mail-in ballots.
The fact that some ballots require more postage than
the standard stamp, that fewer people today
communicate by traditional mail and may not have
stamps on hand, and that postal service in many areas
of the state is contracted and may have limited hours
of service, while in other communities there may not
be local sales of postage stamps at all, means that
this proposal is a low-cost way to easily erase one
obstacle in the voting process.
2.Elimination of the signature requirement for
absentee and mail-in ballots. The Division of
Elections should use its resources to verify voters'
identities and should not rely on an often-illegible
signature of a witness who is not identified in any
other meaningful way on the cover envelope for mailed
ballots. The requirement puts up an unnecessary
barrier to some people who live by themselves or who
may be out of state or country, and this requirement
has in fact caused the rejection of the votes of
otherwise eligible and qualified voters.
3.A ballot cure process. Such a process would ensure
that the Division of Elections looks for problems with
return envelope identification information before the
election and, like 24 other states and the
Municipality of Anchorage, allows voters the chance to
provide missing information before their votes are
discarded. Currently the work of the Division of
Elections to identify problems is already established
but takes place after the election with no recourse
for the voters when they have been notified that their
vote did not count.
These three provisions along with others in the bill
will work to make voting more accessible to Alaskans
who wish to vote in the elections that the Alaska
Division of Elections works so diligently to ensure
are safe and secure.
3:40:00 PM
ED MARTIN, representing self, Kenai, Alaska testified with
concerns on SB 64. He stated that first, there's concern about
election division security and transparency, particularly
regarding mail-in ballots. He urged the legislature to pass a
resolution urging the President to issue an executive order
assigning postmasters as chain-of-custody officers for all
ballots. Second, he submitted a Freedom of Information Act
(FOIA) request on November 2 emailed followed up questions about
WPX Security and wants an answer from the Division. Third, he
stated that the election pamphlet needs correcting. He said he
had concerns about precinct labeling discrepancies for election
reporting.
3:44:36 PM
BARBARA HANEY, representing self, North Pole, Alaska, testified
with concerns on SB 64. She stated that first, the synthetic
media section (page 22, line 8) is too broad. This section
should be reconsidered or removedit's not the Division of
Elections' role and better suited for Alaska Public Offices
Commission (APOC). Second, the signage limit (page 25, line 22)
is unfair. Political signs are capped at 32 sq. ft., while
others (like business signs) can be 66 sq. ft. She stated that
for fair political visibility, the size limit should match
federal standards.
3:50:25 PM
CHAIR KAWASAKI mentioned that the committee had some discussion
on the synthetic media section of the bill. He stated that there
are other similar bills moving through the committee, and the
committee would cover artificial intelligence in more depth
during another meeting. He stated that the 32 sq. ft. sign
limit, ties to an Alaska Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) case and
current billboard law.
3:51:50 PM
RANDY RUEDRICH, representing self, Anchorage, Alaska, testified
with concerns on SB 64. He stated that the witness signature on
absentee and mail-in ballots plays a key role in verifying the
voter's identity and without it, there's no other signature
verification in our process. He stated that in the last election
there were only 512 witness signature issues so given this low
rejection rate, there's no need for a complicated cure process
that adds confusion and cost.
3:56:38 PM
RITA TROMETTER, representing self, North Pole, Alaska, testified
with concerns on SB 64. She stated that Section 38 seems to
reject progress. AI, or "synthetic media," is a modern tool
widely used in the 2024 general election. She said we should
evolve with technology, as we do with computers. She stated that
Section 39 restricts free speech by limiting campaign sign size
on private property. A 32 sq. ft. sign isn't visible from a
highway if it's set back for beautification laws. She said
limiting signs during campaign season downplays the election's
importance and may conflict with past court rulings supporting
larger signs on private land.
3:59:11 PM
CHAIR KAWASAKI held SB 64 in committee.
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|---|---|
| HJR004B.pdf |
SSTA 2/4/2025 3:30:00 PM |
HJR 4 |
| CSHJR4 (RLS) Version G Explanation of Changes 1.26.25.pdf |
SSTA 2/4/2025 3:30:00 PM |
HJR 4 |
| HJR 4 Sponsor Statement 1.26.25.pdf |
SSTA 2/4/2025 3:30:00 PM |
HJR 4 |
| HJR004B.pdf |
SSTA 2/4/2025 3:30:00 PM |
HJR 4 |
| HJR4 Fiscal Note-LEG-SESS-01-24-2025.pdf |
SSTA 2/4/2025 3:30:00 PM |
HJR 4 |
| EF Resolution Opposing the Renaming of Denali.pdf |
SSTA 2/4/2025 3:30:00 PM |
|
| HJR 4 Support.pdf |
SSTA 2/4/2025 3:30:00 PM |
HJR 4 |
| Support letter. Public Citizen SB 64.pdf |
SSTA 2/4/2025 3:30:00 PM |
SB 64 |
| public testimony SB 70.pdf |
SSTA 2/4/2025 3:30:00 PM |
SB 70 |
| Support letters SB 52.pdf |
SSTA 2/4/2025 3:30:00 PM |
SB 52 |
| SB 52 Support letters3.pdf |
SSTA 2/4/2025 3:30:00 PM |
SB 52 |
| SB 64 Public Testimony.pdf |
SSTA 2/4/2025 3:30:00 PM |
SB 64 |
| Support.letters SB 64.pdf |
SSTA 2/4/2025 3:30:00 PM |
SB 64 |
| SB 64 opposition letters.pdf |
SSTA 2/4/2025 3:30:00 PM |
SB 64 |
| SB 64 Letter of Support_Native Movement (002).pdf |
SSTA 2/4/2025 3:30:00 PM |
SB 64 |
| Letters of support SB 64.3.13.25pdf.pdf |
SSTA 2/4/2025 3:30:00 PM |
SB 64 |
| SB 64. Ltr addressing pros.and cons.3.13.25.pdf |
SSTA 2/4/2025 3:30:00 PM |
SB 64 |
| SB64 Letter of Support 2-3-25(2).pdf |
SSTA 2/4/2025 3:30:00 PM |
SB 64 |
| SB 52 Sponsor Statement (updated).pdf |
SSTA 2/4/2025 3:30:00 PM |
SB 52 |