Legislature(2025 - 2026)SENATE FINANCE 532
04/09/2025 09:00 AM Senate FINANCE
Note: the audio ![]()
and video ![]()
recordings are distinct records and are obtained from different sources. As such there may be key differences between the two. The audio recordings are captured by our records offices as the official record of the meeting and will have more accurate timestamps. Use the icons to switch between them.
| Audio | Topic |
|---|---|
| Start | |
| SB113 | |
| SB39 | |
| SB64 | |
| SB92 | |
| Adjourn |
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
| += | SB 39 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | SB 64 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | SB 92 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| += | HB 56 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| += | SB 113 | TELECONFERENCED | |
SENATE BILL NO. 64
"An Act relating to elections; relating to voters;
relating to voting; relating to voter preregistration
for minors at least 16 years of age; relating to voter
registration; relating to the Alaska Public Offices
Commission; relating to synthetic media in
electioneering communications; relating to campaign
signs; relating to public official financial
disclosures; relating to the crime of unlawful
interference with voting in the first degree; and
providing for an effective date."
9:19:34 AM
SENATOR BILL WIELECHOWSKI, SPONSOR, introduced the bill. He
relayed that the bill was a comprehensive package of
reforms aimed at removing barriers to voting, cleaning up
voting rolls, reporting election results faster, and making
needed changes to Alaska election laws. The bill included
provisions from 12 previous bills by members of all four
caucuses and the governor. The Senate State Affairs
Committee had worked to refine the bill over 8 meetings.
The bill removed barriers to voting by creating a ballot
curing process that allowed voters to correct mistakes and
repealed the witness signature requirement that
disproportionately affected rural and military voters. The
witness signature was never verified and had previously
disenfranchised roughly 10 percent of the voters throughout
rural Alaska in the special election in 2022. In 2024,
Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson (JBER) had more mail
ballots rejected than any other district in the state. He
did not think it was a partisan issue.
Senator Wielechowski continued that in 2022 it was
estimated that the state voter registration list equaled
106 percent of the adult population. The bill clarified
residency definitions for voting. It improved Alaska's
voter roll clean up statutes and implemented a ballot
tracking system. It included numerous provisions to improve
the security and integrity of Alaska's elections. It
included a provision requiring synthetic media to include a
disclaimer on election communications. It included several
provisions to allow election results to be reported faster
and provide more transparency during the counting process.
Senator Wielechowski stressed that the bill required
preliminary ranked choice voting tabulations to be released
whenever updated results were released. It allowed election
to be certified five days earlier by creating a uniform
deadline for ballots to be received 10 days after the
election. He thought the bill was a comprehensive package
that would absolutely improve the state's election system.
Co-Chair Stedman wondered about automatic registration via
the Permanent Fund Dividend (PFD) application.
Senator Wielechowski replied that the bill did not change
or impact the automatic voter registration. He thought the
provision was added by voters via the initiative process,
which he thought had passed by the highest number of voters
in history.
9:22:57 AM
DAVID DUNSMORE, STAFF, SENATOR WIELECHOWSKI, relayed that
the only provision in the bill related to PFD registration
was added language to clarify that registering to vote via
the PFD application was not considered to be contacting the
division for purposes of the voter roll clean-up statutes.
Co-Chair Stedman had concerns related to automatic voter
registration. He thought the matter needed to be discussed
further.
Senator Kiehl asked about proposed changes to clean-up of
voter rolls.
Mr. Dunsmore explained that there were several provisions
in the bill related to the voter roll cleanup. He mentioned
a provision clarifying the definition of residency, which
Senate Majority counsel had worked on. There were
provisions that expedited notice for those that had not
voted. Several provisions were added related to individuals
establishing residency in another state. Additional
provisions added in the Senate State Affairs Committee
related to hiring consultants to conduct regular reviews of
voter rolls to identify areas of needed improvement.
9:26:15 AM
SONJA KAWASAKI, LEGAL COUNSEL, SENATE MAJORITY, explained
that current law allowed that once a person established
residency, an individual did not lose the right to vote if
there was an intent to return. The change proposed in the
bill would require a person that had an absence from the
state have a reasonable and articulable plan to return to
the state. The sponsor believed the provision would set a
higher bar for residency. There were voter cleanup
provisions that would address people that appeared to be no
longer residents of Alaska. The individuals would be sent a
notice that assurance was necessary to be considered a
resident.
Senator Kaufman wanted to be sure about the concept of
residency in the state. He wondered if the bill could be
misconstrued to require returning to the exact same
address.
Ms. Kawasaki replied that current law required
establishment of residence in the House district in which
you were registered. Under the bill, if an individual left
the state and had an articulable and reasonable plan to
return at the residence at which they were registered, that
individual would still meet the qualifications for voting
in the House district. She thought that current law
dictated that if one moved within a Senate district, the
vote would count for statewide elections. The intent of the
bill was to allow a person to still vote if they moved
within the same House district.
Senator Kaufman asked if Ms. Kawasaki meant that a person
had to have an intent to return to the same House district.
Ms. Kawasaki answered, "in order to vote for elections in
that House district."
Senator Kaufman requested to follow up later.
9:30:54 AM
Senator Cronk asked about removal of the witness signature
and asked about issues with the signature.
Senator Wielechowski reiterated that in the 2022 special
election, roughly 10 percent of rural voters in the state
had votes thrown out for failing to provide a witness
signature. He discussed challenges in obtaining a witness
signature and noted that it disproportionately affected
people in rural areas and military districts. He understood
the rationale for a witness signature but pointed out that
it was not verified. He described a hypothetical situation
he discussed with the Division of Elections. He relayed
that the bill was a remedy for those that were
disenfranchised.
Senator Cronk shared that he had never had a constituent
call to describe the problem.
Mr. Dunsmore elaborated that the witness signature
requirement for absentee voting in the state law was a
unique provision. For other purposes, the division allowed
self-certification. He mentioned the ballot initiative
booklet. The witness signature did not provide election
integrity as there was no requirement that the person
signing verify the identity of the voter. He mentioned
service members overseas or Peace Corps volunteers. He
mentioned 2,700 ballots that were thrown out during the
special election.
Senator Kaufman asked how signatures were handled with
paper registration scanned and emailed.
Mr. Dunsmore asked if Senator Kaufman was referring to
voter registration.
Senator Kaufman answered affirmatively.
Mr. Dunsmore replied that he thought the division accepted
voter registration forms submitted electronically.
9:36:10 AM
CAROL BEECHER, DIRECTOR, DIVISION OF ELECTIONS, OFFICE OF
THE LIEUTENANT GOVERNOR, replied that for voter
registration forms, the signature was verified against
motor vehicle records or other identifiers if the signature
was not available.
Senator Kaufman asked if there was any provision for an
electronic signature.
Ms. Beecher replied in the negative but thought there was
an electronic signature provision in the bill. She noted
that the verifier signature was an image of the Division of
Motor Vehicles signature.
Co-Chair Stedman discussed automatic registration and
thought it had created problems for the Division of
Elections.
Ms. Beecher asked for more detail.
Co-Chair Stedman relayed that he was talking about
automatic voter registration through the PFD application.
Ms. Beecher described the automatic registration process
through the PFD application, which provided the division
with a list of individuals that had indicated they were
United States citizens on the application. The division did
not receive any forms from individuals that had noted they
were not a US citizen. Anyone on the list that was a new
registrant or had changed their address received a letter
asking if they wanted to be registered to vote. If the
letter was not answered, the individuals were automatically
registered.
Co-Chair Stedman thought individuals should have the
gumption to actively go register to vote and take an
interest in democracy, as opposed to automatic
registration. He found the process questionable.
Senator Kaufman mentioned that he had talked with a
surprising number of people during political campaigns that
relayed having not lived in the state for years but had
names on the voter lists. He asked if the bill would
address the problem.
9:40:30 AM
Ms. Beecher replied that the voter rolls would always
appear to be bloated if looking at the perspective of how
many eligible voters there were in Alaska compared to how
many eligible voters there were. The reason was due to the
intent to return language in statute. She listed examples
of individuals that could reside overseas (in the military)
or could be residing in another state and have the intent
to return to the state and still be eligible to vote in the
state. She discussed the amount of time it took to be
completely removed from voter rolls, which was in federal
law and lasted two general elections. If a person applied
for the PFD, it would be sufficient activity to continue on
the voter rolls.
Co-Chair Hoffman thought that individuals attending college
out of state would be included.
Senator Kaufman thought that there was a financial
incentive for staying on the voter rolls.
Co-Chair Stedman considered all 50 states and wondered
about a comparison between Alaska's voter lists.
Ms. Beecher replied that she had spoken to a secretary of
state from another state that experienced challenges with
voter rolls due to summer employees.
Senator Kaufman wondered about drop boxes and asked about
what might be in the bill.
Ms. Beecher responded that under the bill every region
(there were five regions) would be required to have a drop
box.
Senator Kaufman asked Ms. Beecher to repeat her answer.
Ms. Beecher relayed that the bill required drop boxes in
each of the five regional locations.
Senator Kaufman asked if the bill only required a drop box
in each of the five regions.
Ms. Beecher agreed.
9:44:40 AM
Senator Kiehl was curious about notices sent to inactive
voters, and applying for the PFD being considered as
sufficient voter action to remain on the list. He asked if
Section 9 of the bill would address the issue.
Mr. Dunsmore replied in the affirmative.
Senator Kaufman asked about the cost of maintaining drop
boxes.
Ms. Beecher replied that the fiscal note reflected an
anticipated $23,000 for the five drop boxes. There were
also shipping costs and storage costs to store the drop
boxes. The total was estimated to be $30,000 for the
additional purchase, with some costs ongoing.
9:46:56 AM
TOM STEWART, DIRECTOR OF POLICY, SECURE DEMOCRACY USA,
BALTIMORE (via teleconference), spoke in support of the
bill. He supported the CS from the Senate State Affairs
Committee. He stressed that strengthening election security
and improving voter freedoms were not mutually exclusive
and were necessary to build public trust. His organization
had worked with the legislature in a bipartisan manner
since 2022 to review and pose improvements to election
administration and voting integrity. He thought the bill
would ultimately improve Alaska's trust and confidence in
future elections. He highlighted provisions such as list
maintenance practices to help keep voter rolls accurate,
improved voter registration practices, strengthened ballot
tracking, speeding up reporting of results, and creating a
uniform statewide ballot cure process.
Mr. Stewart referenced further bill provisions that would
strengthen the election process. He discussed elimination
of the witness signature requirement, which he considered
was unfair in its application and disenfranchised rural and
senior voters disproportionately. He thought there were
better ways to verify voters.
9:51:00 AM
Co-Chair Hoffman OPENED public testimony.
9:51:19 AM
KENDRA KLOSTER, DIRECTOR OF GOVERNMENT RELATIONS, ALASKA
FEDERATION OF NATIVES, ANCHORAGE (via teleconference),
testified in support of the legislation. She noted that the
Alaska Federation of Natives (AFN) was the largest native
organization in the state. She discussed AFN's support of
accessible elections and expressed concerns about voter
disenfranchisement. She noted that the state had no ballot
curing process. She mentioned proposed voter reforms
supported by AFN, which would provide easier access. She
cautioned for provisions that could limit access, such as
repealing automatic voter registration. Additionally, she
expressed concern about the idea of not counting votes
received after election day. She mentioned mail
difficulties, rural areas, and military members.
Co-Chair Stedman wondered if AFN saw a high correlation
between Western Alaska and small towns in Southeast dealing
with uncounted ballots due to lack of witness signature. He
wanted to get a sense of the magnitude of the issue.
Ms. Kloster replied that she could provide a breakdown that
she would send to the committee. In 2024's general election
there was about an 8 percent rejected rate for mission
signatures. Districts 38, 39, and 40 had an even higher
rejected rate of about 14 percent.
9:55:31 AM
RANDY RUEDRICH, SELF, ANCHORAGE (via teleconference), spoke
against the bill. He had worked on state elections for many
years. He recounted that in 2001 there had been more people
registered in the state of Alaska than there were of voting
age. He thought the problem had been present for some time.
He did not think automated voter registration created the
problem. He discussed residency and pondered a "snowbird
law" and a "dropout law." He thought it was nonsensical to
expect voters that moved to return to the same residence.
Mr. Ruedrich discussed the witness signature requirement.
He did not support elimination of the witness signature
requirement. He considered the number of witness signature
challenges in the 2024 election, which he did not think
were numerous. He thought there was a complete
mischaracterization of the problem with the required
witness signature. He did not think the state needed a
ballot cure process. He supported an election day deadline
for ballots.
10:01:56 AM
MIKE GARVEY, POLICY DIRECTOR, AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES
UNION ALASKA, ANCHORAGE (via teleconference), spoke in
support of the legislation. He thought the bill would help
uphold the voting rights of Alaskans and improve the
integrity of elections. He supported repealing the witness
signature requirement and establishing a ballot curing
system. He discussed the ballot curing provision. He cited
data from the Division of Elections that indicated that in
the 2024 general election, 242 ballots were rejected in
districts of the committee members. He noted that the
Alaska Superior Court recently ruled that the
responsibility to implement a ballot curing system fell to
the legislature. He thought counting every eligible vote
was essential.
10:04:53 AM
BARBARA WARNER, EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, NATIONAL VOTE AT HOME
INSTITUTE, PORTLAND (via teleconference), testified in
support of the bill. She thought the bill would expand
access to mail ballots and the systems that supported
voters' confidence in them. She discussed best practices
proposed in the bill including eliminating the witness
signature requirement, implementing ballot tracking and
curing, providing drop boxes and prepaid postage for
returning ballots, and allowing for pre-processing of
ballots for election day. She supported adding a provision
to allow for a single sign-up, which would allow for voters
to receive all mail-in ballots going forward. She thought
the single sign up resulted in significant cost savings.
She discussed the popularity of mail-in ballots. She
referenced a resolution by the Anchorage Assembly that
allowed for mail-in ballots.
Co-Chair Hoffman CLOSED public testimony.
10:09:09 AM
Senator Kiehl reviewed the fiscal notes. He listed a zero
fiscal note from the Department of Administration, Alaska
Public Offices Commission, OMB Component 70.
Senator Kiehl addressed FN 3 from the Office of the
Governor, Division of Elections, OMB Component 21. The note
did not show a cost for FY 26, but showed an FY 27 cost of
$338.8 thousand in UGF for one full-time position and five
temporary positions. In the out years, the division
levelized the even and odd years for an average of $290.1
thousand. The one full-time position was constant, and the
temporary positions were for every other year.
Senator Wielechowski thanked the committee.
10:10:37 AM
AT EASE
10:11:08 AM
RECONVENED
SB 64 was HEARD and HELD in committee for further
consideration.
10:11:20 AM
AT EASE
10:13:13 AM
RECONVENED
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|---|---|
| SB 39 03.26.25 SFIN Follow-Up to 03.20.25 Hearing.pdf |
SFIN 3/20/2025 9:00:00 AM SFIN 4/9/2025 9:00:00 AM |
SB 39 |
| SB 39 Sectional Analysis version N 2.25.2025.pdf |
SFIN 3/20/2025 9:00:00 AM SFIN 4/9/2025 9:00:00 AM |
SB 39 |
| SB 39 Sponsor Statement Version N 2.25.2025.pdf |
SFIN 3/20/2025 9:00:00 AM SFIN 4/9/2025 9:00:00 AM |
SB 39 |
| SB 39 Summary of Changes Version N 2.25.2025.pdf |
SFIN 3/20/2025 9:00:00 AM SFIN 4/9/2025 9:00:00 AM |
SB 39 |
| SB 39 Supporting Documents.pdf |
SFIN 3/20/2025 9:00:00 AM SFIN 4/9/2025 9:00:00 AM |
SB 39 |
| SB 39 Letters of Opposition 2.25.2025.pdf |
SFIN 3/20/2025 9:00:00 AM SFIN 4/9/2025 9:00:00 AM |
SB 39 |
| SB 39 Letters of Support 2.25.2025.pdf |
SFIN 3/20/2025 9:00:00 AM SFIN 4/9/2025 9:00:00 AM |
SB 39 |
| SB 39 OLA - Alaska Comment Letter.pdf |
SFIN 3/20/2025 9:00:00 AM SFIN 4/9/2025 9:00:00 AM |
SB 39 |
| SB 39 Hudson Cook Testimony.pdf |
SFIN 3/20/2025 9:00:00 AM SFIN 4/9/2025 9:00:00 AM |
SB 39 |
| SB 39 Opposition Testimony ILPA AK.pdf |
SFIN 3/20/2025 9:00:00 AM SFIN 4/9/2025 9:00:00 AM |
SB 39 |
| SB 39 Miller Testimony 2025.pdf |
SFIN 3/20/2025 9:00:00 AM SFIN 4/9/2025 9:00:00 AM |
SB 39 |
| SB 39 AFSA comment letter - AK SB 39 rate caps 03.20.2025.pdf |
SFIN 3/20/2025 9:00:00 AM SFIN 4/9/2025 9:00:00 AM |
SB 39 |
| SB 39 2025 03 31 OLA Ltr re SB 39 Testimony Inaccuracies.pdf |
SFIN 4/9/2025 9:00:00 AM |
SB 39 |
| SB 39 Watson Testimony.pdf |
SFIN 4/9/2025 9:00:00 AM |
SB 39 |
| SB 39 CRL Written Response re AK SB 39.pdf |
SFIN 4/9/2025 9:00:00 AM |
SB 39 |
| SB 39 INFiN AK Statement.3.20.25.pdf |
SFIN 4/9/2025 9:00:00 AM |
SB 39 |
| SB 39 mark up rate calculation TILA.pdf |
SFIN 4/9/2025 9:00:00 AM |
SB 39 |
| SB 64 Summary of Changes I to W 4.2.2025.pdf |
SFIN 4/9/2025 9:00:00 AM |
SB 64 |
| SB 64 Sponsor Statement version W 4.2.2025.pdf |
SFIN 4/9/2025 9:00:00 AM |
SB 64 |
| SB 64 Sectional Analysis version W 4.2.2025.pdf |
SFIN 4/9/2025 9:00:00 AM |
SB 64 |
| SB 64 Letters of Opposition 3.26.25.pdf |
SFIN 4/9/2025 9:00:00 AM |
SB 64 |
| SB 64 Letters of Support 3.26.25.pdf |
SFIN 4/9/2025 9:00:00 AM |
SB 64 |
| SB 92 DOR Presentation to SRES.pdf |
SFIN 4/9/2025 9:00:00 AM SRES 4/2/2025 3:30:00 PM |
SB 92 |
| SB 92 Email DOR to SRES Staff 3.11.25 re DOR Response to Questions.pdf |
SFIN 4/9/2025 9:00:00 AM |
SB 92 |
| SB 92 Email DOR to Senators 3.4.25 re Meeting Follow Up & Docs.pdf |
SFIN 4/9/2025 9:00:00 AM SRES 4/2/2025 3:30:00 PM |
SB 92 |
| Legislative Research on S-Corps in Other States.pdf |
SFIN 4/9/2025 9:00:00 AM |
SB 92 |
| Hilcorp - Where We Operate.pdf |
SFIN 4/9/2025 9:00:00 AM |
SB 92 |
| SB 92 Invited Testimony Presentation - CPA Tax Analysis Slides $10B.pdf |
SFIN 4/9/2025 9:00:00 AM |
SB 92 |
| SB 92 Testimony Wuestenfeld.pdf |
SFIN 4/9/2025 9:00:00 AM |
SB 92 |
| SB 92 Presentation to Senate Finance 4.9.25.pdf |
SFIN 4/9/2025 9:00:00 AM |
SB 92 |
| SB 92 Fiscal Note DOR - OLD NOTE.pdf |
SFIN 4/9/2025 9:00:00 AM |
SB 92 |
| SB 92 Sectional Analysis v.S |
SFIN 4/9/2025 9:00:00 AM |
SB 92 |
| SB 92 Public Testimony.pdf |
SFIN 4/9/2025 9:00:00 AM |
SB 92 |
| SB 92 Legislative Research Alaska Business Entities and Taxation.pdf |
SFIN 4/9/2025 9:00:00 AM |
SB 92 |
| SB 92 IRS Qualified Business Income Deduction.pdf |
SFIN 4/9/2025 9:00:00 AM |
SB 92 |
| SB 92 IRS 2024 Form 6251.pdf |
SFIN 4/9/2025 9:00:00 AM |
SB 92 |
| SB 92 Historical Documents Provided by (S)RES.pdf |
SFIN 4/9/2025 9:00:00 AM |
SB 92 |
| SB 92 DOR Presentation to SRES.pdf |
SFIN 4/9/2025 9:00:00 AM |
SB 92 |
| SB 92 Testimony Long.pdf |
SFIN 4/9/2025 9:00:00 AM |
SB 92 |
| SB 92 Testimony Demers.pdf |
SFIN 4/9/2025 9:00:00 AM |
SB 92 |
| SB 92 Testimony Griswold.pdf |
SFIN 4/9/2025 9:00:00 AM |
SB 92 |
| SB 92 Testimony Maurer.pdf |
SFIN 4/9/2025 9:00:00 AM |
SB 92 |
| SB 92 Testimony Faust.pdf |
SFIN 4/9/2025 9:00:00 AM |
SB 92 |
| SB 92 Testimony Brown.pdf |
SFIN 4/9/2025 9:00:00 AM |
SB 92 |
| SB 92 Testimony Baily.pdf |
SFIN 4/9/2025 9:00:00 AM |
SB 92 |
| SB 92 Testimony Martin.pdf |
SFIN 4/9/2025 9:00:00 AM |
SB 92 |
| SB 92 Testimony Allmeroth.pdf |
SFIN 4/9/2025 9:00:00 AM |
SB 92 |
| SB 39 Explanation of Changes ver. N to ver. I April 7 2025.pdf |
SFIN 4/9/2025 9:00:00 AM |
SB 39 |
| SB 39 work draft version I.pdf |
SFIN 4/9/2025 9:00:00 AM |
SB 39 |
| SB 113 3-24-25 CTIA Alaska SB 113 Letter.pdf |
SFIN 4/9/2025 9:00:00 AM |
SB 113 |
| SB 113 Banuelos Testimony.pdf |
SFIN 3/10/2025 9:00:00 AM SFIN 4/9/2025 9:00:00 AM |
SB 113 |
| SB 113 Public Testimony Allmeroth.pdf |
SFIN 3/10/2025 9:00:00 AM SFIN 4/9/2025 9:00:00 AM |
SB 113 |
| SB 113 Research - CCH AnswersConnect - Market Based Sourcing.pdf |
SFIN 3/6/2025 9:00:00 AM SFIN 3/10/2025 9:00:00 AM SFIN 4/9/2025 9:00:00 AM |
SB 113 |
| SB 113 Sponsor Statement version A 2.26.25.pdf |
SFIN 3/6/2025 9:00:00 AM SFIN 3/10/2025 9:00:00 AM SFIN 4/9/2025 9:00:00 AM |
SB 113 |
| SB 113 Sectional Analysis version A 2.26.25.pdf |
SFIN 3/6/2025 9:00:00 AM SFIN 3/10/2025 9:00:00 AM SFIN 4/9/2025 9:00:00 AM |
SB 113 |
| SB 113 Research - CCH AnswersConnect - Apportionment Formulas.pdf |
SFIN 3/6/2025 9:00:00 AM SFIN 3/10/2025 9:00:00 AM SFIN 4/9/2025 9:00:00 AM |
SB 113 |
| SB 113 Research Tax Division 2024 Annual Report excerpt.pdf |
SFIN 3/6/2025 9:00:00 AM SFIN 3/10/2025 9:00:00 AM SFIN 4/9/2025 9:00:00 AM |
SB 113 |
| SB 39 2025 04 07 OLA Letter to Sen Kaufman re SB 39.pdf |
SFIN 4/9/2025 9:00:00 AM |
SB 39 |
| SB 39 RBFC AK SB 39 Opposition Letter.pdf |
SFIN 4/9/2025 9:00:00 AM |
SB 39 |
| SB 113 Public Testimony.pdf |
SFIN 4/9/2025 9:00:00 AM |
SB 113 |
| SB 64 OOG DOE 040425.pdf |
SFIN 4/9/2025 9:00:00 AM |
SB 64 |
| SB 92 Explanation of Changes v.L to v.S.pdf |
SFIN 4/9/2025 9:00:00 AM |
SB 92 |
| SB 92 Sectional Analysis v.S.pdf |
SFIN 4/9/2025 9:00:00 AM |
SB 92 |
| SB 92 Sponsor Statement.pdf |
SFIN 4/9/2025 9:00:00 AM |
SB 92 |
| SB 39 RBFC AK SB 39 Opposition Letter (2).pdf |
SFIN 4/9/2025 9:00:00 AM |
SB 39 |
| SB 64 2025.4.8 NM SB 64 Letter of Support.pdf |
SFIN 4/9/2025 9:00:00 AM |
SB 64 |
| SB 92 Testimony Fredeen.pdf |
SFIN 4/9/2025 9:00:00 AM |
SB 92 |
| SB 92 testimony Stead.pdf |
SFIN 4/9/2025 9:00:00 AM |
SB 92 |
| SB 92 Support Letter 4_02_25.pdf |
SFIN 4/9/2025 9:00:00 AM |
SB 92 |
| SB 92 Testimony Droop.pdf |
SFIN 4/9/2025 9:00:00 AM |
SB 92 |
| SB 92 Testimony Schmidt.pdf |
SFIN 4/9/2025 9:00:00 AM |
SB 92 |
| SB 92 Testimony Rennolds.pdf |
SFIN 4/9/2025 9:00:00 AM |
SB 92 |
| SB 92 Testimoy Kandror.pdf |
SFIN 4/9/2025 9:00:00 AM |
SB 92 |
| SB 92 – Opposition Carlstrom.pdf |
SFIN 4/9/2025 9:00:00 AM |
SB 92 |
| SB 92 Testimony Stokes.pdf |
SFIN 4/9/2025 9:00:00 AM |
SB 92 |
| SB 92 citizen testimony.pdf |
SFIN 4/9/2025 9:00:00 AM |
SB 92 |