Legislature(2013 - 2014)BUTROVICH 205
03/26/2013 09:00 AM Senate STATE AFFAIRS
| Audio | Topic |
|---|---|
| Start | |
| Confirmation Hearings | |
| SB11 | |
| SB63 | |
| Adjourn |
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
| + | TELECONFERENCED | ||
| *+ | SB 11 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| = | SB 63 | ||
SB 63-CONTRACTS FOR PREPARATION OF BALLOTS
9:55:23 AM
CHAIR DYSON announced that the final order of business would be
SB 63.
LAURA PIERRE, Staff, Senator Anna Fairclough, provided
information related to SB 63 on behalf of the sponsor. She noted
a work draft in the packets for the members to consider.
CHAIR DYSON asked if it was the N version of SB 63.
MS. PIERRE said that was correct.
9:56:05 AM
SENATOR GIESSEL moved to adopt CSSB 63, labeled 28-LS0459\N, as
the working draft. There being no objection, it was so ordered.
MS. PIERRE addressed the committee's concerns from the last
hearing of the bill. She noted the sponsor worked with the
Division of Elections to find new language that would satisfy
the director regarding the flexibility of accepting bids based
on criteria other than low bid. The work draft now includes the
bid for the preparation of ballots under the Request For
Proposal (RFP) process in the state procurement code.
9:57:12 AM
CHAIR DYSON requested to know the changes made to version A,
resulting in version N.
MS. PIERRE explained that there is a title change in version N.
The new title now reads, "An Act making contracts for the
preparation of election ballots subject to the provisions of the
state procurement code." She related that language was removed
from subsection (3) of Section 1, which now reads, "The director
shall contract for the preparation of ballots under AS 36.30
(State Procurement Code)."
She described another change on page 4 - Section 2 was removed
and replaced with, "AS 36.30.850(b)(7) is amended to read:
contracts for the transportation of ballots under AS 15." This
includes the preparation of ballots under the procurement code.
SENATOR WIELECHOWSKI asked if the bill applies to both paper
ballots and electronic ballots.
MS. PIERRE deferred to Ms. Fenumai to answer.
9:59:40 AM
GAIL FENUMAI, Director, Division of Elections, Office of the
Lieutenant Governor, answered questions related to SB 63. She
said the bill would address printed paper ballots.
SENATOR WIELECHOWSKI requested information about transparency in
the procurement process.
MS. FENUMAI deferred to Mr. Jones.
10:00:29 AM
VERN JONES, Chief Procurement Officer, Division of General
Services, Department of Administration, answered questions
related to SB 63. He stressed that the procurement code is
completely transparent, depending on the method that is used.
There are four formal procurements. At the $50,000 and above
level, the ITB Process, which is a low bid process, is used and
it is advertised on the on-line public notice web site for 21
days. It is the same process for an RFP, plus results are
published. Small procurements for under $50,000 have informal
quotes or RFP's and use the same methods of advertising. There
are also exceptions built into the procurement process, such as
for emergencies and limited competition, which are less
transparent.
SENATOR WIELECHOWSKI asked, if there was a special election,
would the procurement process in place be able to meet the
timelines.
MR. JONES said the code is flexible and could adapt to a special
election timeframe and allow other types of procurements.
SENATOR WIELECHOWSKI envisioned a primary election situation
that requires a fast turnaround. He wondered if a blanket
procurement would be used for the entire election season.
10:04:27 AM
MS. FENUMAI said the division would procure ballots for the
entire calendar year.
SENATOR WIELECHOWSKI noted that it would not be known who would
be on the general election ballot until after the primary and
there would be tight deadlines.
MS. FENUMAI said that was correct; however, the RFP would go out
based on quantity.
SENATOR WIELECHOWSKI concluded that the procurement process
would not have to be repeated.
MS. FENUMAI said yes; an RFP would be issued based on estimated
quantities for both the primary and the general election.
CHAIR DYSON assumed the contract would have provisions in it if
there was a special election.
MS. FENUMAI agreed.
SENATOR WIELECHOWSKI asked if the division supports the bill.
10:05:46 AM
MS. FENUMAI related that the exception for ballot printing in
the procurement code has been in place since 1986. The division
has experienced no problems with the current printer since 2002.
She stated that if it is the will of the legislature to have the
ballots printed by a competitive bidder, the way the bill is
drafted now would be in the best interest of the division.
CHAIR DYSON stressed the importance of elections and the
necessity to find a reliable vendor.
SENATOR WIELECHOWSKI agreed. He inquired if the procurement code
allows for quality.
10:07:04 AM
MR. JONES replied that within the procurement code, the RFP
process specifically allows for the evaluation of prior
experience, qualifications, and quality of equipment, rather
than just price.
SENATOR COGHILL commented that there is a limited scope in
Alaska as to who can do the work. He noted the division has
contracted with the same vendor for a while. He wondered if past
performance could become part of the criteria.
MS. FENUMAI posited several possible questions the division
could ask in order to determine past performance and experience
in printing ballots.
SENATOR COGHILL gave an example, "Have you printed for a
municipality?"
MS. FENUMAI said it's obvious that no other printer has printed
ballots on a statewide basis so that would not be a fair
criteria to use in an RFP.
10:09:18 AM
SENATOR GIESSEL moved to report CSSB 63, version 28-LS0459\N,
from committee with individual recommendations and a forthcoming
fiscal note. There being no objection, CSSB 63(STA) was reported
from the Senate State Affairs Standing Committee.
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|---|---|
| SB 11 - Sponsor Statement.pdf |
SSTA 3/26/2013 9:00:00 AM |
SB 11 |
| SB 11 - Section Analysis.pdf |
SSTA 3/26/2013 9:00:00 AM |
SB 11 |
| SB 11 - Version A.pdf |
SSTA 3/26/2013 9:00:00 AM |
SB 11 |
| SB 11 - Fiscal Note -DCCED-DCRA-03-23-13.pdf |
SSTA 3/26/2013 9:00:00 AM |
SB 11 |
| SB 11 - Fiscal Note DOC-OC-03-22-13.pdf |
SSTA 3/26/2013 9:00:00 AM |
SB 11 |
| SB 11 - Handouts.pdf |
SSTA 3/26/2013 9:00:00 AM |
SB 11 |
| SB 11 - Fiscal Note -LAW-CRIM-03-22-13.pdf |
SSTA 3/26/2013 9:00:00 AM |
SB 11 |
| SB 11 - Alaska Committee Letter 2013.pdf |
SSTA 3/26/2013 9:00:00 AM |
SB 11 |