Legislature(2003 - 2004)
04/24/2003 03:40 PM Senate STA
| Audio | Topic |
|---|
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
SB 63-MUNICIPAL ANNEXATIONS AND DETACHMENTS
MARY JACKSON, staff to Senator Thomas Wagoner, explained this
bill was introduced as a result of the contentious Homer
annexation that raised the question of when the taxation of an
annexed area would begin. This bill remedies the question and
sets it in statute.
The Local Boundary Commission (LBC) reviewed original draft
legislation in September 2002 and recommended additional issues
be addressed in the bill. The new LBC concurred with the bill,
but requested it be expanded to include new incorporations as
well. The bill was amended and the proposed CS is the product.
CHAIR GARY STEVENS asked for a motion to adopt the CS as the
working document.
SENATOR GRETCHEN GUESS made a motion to adopt CSSB 63 \H version
as the working document. There was no objection.
MS. JACKSON explained the LBC supports the \H version that makes
the following changes:
· Section 1 extends the same time restrictions for annexed
areas in the current bill to newly incorporated areas.
· The CS deletes the immediate effective date that was in
the original bill.
In addition, the LBC asked for intent language and the legal
department was in the process of drafting an amendment to
accommodate the request.
CHAIR GARY STEVENS said he would hold the bill until the
amendment was available, but he would take public testimony that
day.
MARY GRISWOLD from Homer testified in support of the CS because
it clarifies in statute in cases of incorporation, annexation,
and detachments that property taxes accrue in full each January
1. It's consistent with existing policy across the state for
assessing property and adding new property to the tax rolls.
With many annexations there is also a corresponding detachment
from another government. Using January 1 as a cutoff date to
establish value and jurisdiction provides less disruption.
During the transition period, the government that is providing
services can be appropriately compensated through a contract
agreement worked out in the transition plans.
If the LBC was able to direct municipalities to levy taxes on
property within their jurisdiction as of any date other than
January 1, serious conflicts could arise. Also, adopting SB 63
without including incorporations risks multiple taxation when an
area within a service area of an organized borough incorporates
as a city before July 1. If the city levies taxes in the initial
year following incorporation while the taxes in the detached
area of the borough remain in effect, the property owners in the
new city would be taxed twice.
DAN BOCKHORST, staff to the LBC, advised the commission wrote a
letter to the Chair expressing three concerns regarding the
original legislation. Two were addressed in the CS and the third
issue is the subject of the proposed amendment Ms. Jackson spoke
to. He preferred to defer his comments until the amendment was
available for review.
DARROLL HARGRAVES said he sent a letter to the Chair on 4/23
addressed satisfactorily in the CS.
CHAIR GARY STEVENS acknowledged the letter was in the file and
advised the committee would take action on the bill when they
had the intent language from Legislative Legal.
DR. DOUGLAS STARK from Homer testified in support of SB 63.
CHAIR GARY STEVENS held SB 63 in committee.
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|