Legislature(1997 - 1998)
03/26/1997 01:50 PM Senate JUD
| Audio | Topic |
|---|
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
SB 63 DEADLY WEAPON OFFENSES BY JUVENILES
SENATOR DONLEY , sponsor of the measure, stated legislation similar
to SB 63 passed the Senate during the last legislative session but
died in the House Finance Committee in the last days of the
session. If SB 63 passes, a person between the ages of 16 and 18
would automatically go to adult court for a second offense
involving assault with a deadly weapon. Senator Donley estimated
five or six juveniles would fall in this category per year.
Number 469
ROBERT BUTTCANE , a juvenile probation officer supervisor based in
Anchorage, testified DHSS is opposed to SB 63 as drafted because it
lowers the automatic waiver to include class B and C felony
offenses. DHSS does not believe SB 63 creates an appropriate
response for these types of crimes. It is likely that a person who
commits this type of an offense for a second time would be
institutionalized in a youth corrections facility and in that
environment would undergo a variety of treatment programs to
address and correct those behaviors. DHSS believes the dual
sentencing approach, established in HB 97, is a better response to
young repeat offenders as opposed to a waiver into the adult
system.
SENATOR MILLER said Mr. Buttcane is admitting the current system
does not work if a youth offender is out committing offenses for a
second time.
SENATOR PEARCE asked Mr. Buttcane if he knew whether anyone has
been charged in the drive-by shooting incident at the McLaughlin
Youth facility. MR. BUTTCANE said an investigation is underway,
but did not know whether any formal charges have been filed.
CHAIRMAN TAYLOR noted SB 63 has been narrowly crafted to only
impact a juvenile who was previously adjudicated for a similar
offense. He asked what percentage of youth offenders who violate
this law actually have their cases go through adjudication. MR.
BUTTCANE did not have those statistics available, but estimated
offenses against persons that are petitioned before the court total
69 percent; the other 31 percent might include cases where a 13
year old became involved in a domestic violence dispute with an
alcoholic mother, and used a metal pipe or other instrument that is
classified as a dangerous weapon.
CHAIRMAN TAYLOR asked, of the 69 percent that result in a petition
being filed, what portion end up with a formal adjudication. MR.
BUTTCANE guessed approximately 90 percent, but some of those cases
end in probation.
CHAIRMAN TAYLOR commented he served as standing master for six
years and only remembers a handful of formal adjudications.
Frequently the probation officer would work with the family and
offender and the outcome would be a dismissal based on corrective
activities taking place, similar to an SIS on the criminal side.
He said any of those offenders that received such treatment would
not fall within SB 63 because it requires the offender to have
already been adjudicated once. MR. BUTTCANE replied the response
Senator Taylor described is fairly common for property offenses,
but is not as common for cases involving physical injury.
Number 565
SENATOR PEARCE asked what charges were filed against the six
juveniles referred to in Senator Donley's sponsor statement.
SENATOR DONLEY replied he reviewed a record of assaults with deadl
weapons that showed the number of repeat offenders and the crimes
that were repeated that involved deadly weapons but the individual
case studies were not available. MR. BUTTCANE said he would
identify those cases to determine the original offenses and provide
that information to the committee at a later date.
SENATOR PEARCE commented she asked because she has compassion for
a young person, or anyone, in an abusive situation, and is aware
crimes are committed in those situations that society sometimes
views differently. She said the fact that only 6 people would have
fallen under this category in 1995, despite a 200 percent increase
in juvenile crime between 1990 and 1994, tells us this bill would
not apply to a large pool of people. She suggested investigating
the six cases to determine whether those juveniles are from abusive
situations however she cautioned we have to remember that people
are often charged for a lesser offense than the offense committed.
Number 584
SENATOR MILLER stated if the second offense is not dealt with
adequately, the third offense might result in a death. MR.
BUTTCANE replied he appreciated Senator Miller's comment, and
agreed that in some cases it does not matter what treatment is
provided, some minors simply grow old but do not grow up. He
noted, however, in the vast majority of youth cases, those kids get
their lives together and need to be given an opportunity to change
and grow. He repeated DHSS believes an automatic waiver into adult
court for these cases is not the preferred option.
TAPE 97-24, SIDE B
MARGOT KNUTH , Assistant Attorney General, representing the
Governor's Cabinet on Youth and Justice, clarified the
Administration's position on SB 63. The repeat offenders that SB
63 focusses on do not need to be coddled. The first thing
identified by the Conference on Youth and Justice is that a small
group of youth offenders are at risk of becoming serious, chronic
offenders, and the state needs to be in their faces every step of
the way. The offenders being discussed comprise that group which
consists of repeat class B or C felony offenders. Given that
traditional methods of dealing with these offenders have not proven
effective, 40 states, as well as Alaska, have looked to automatic
waiver as the solution. The Conference on Youth and Justice spent
nine months examining that approach and takes issue with it.
Instead of automatic waivers for these juveniles, the Conference is
proposing a dual sentencing scheme in which the offender receives
both a juvenile sentence and an adult sentence as if automatic
waiver occurred. This approach creates more interaction between
the state and the offender and allows for closer surveillance of
the offender. Dual sentences also place the responsibility on the
offender to comply with the juvenile sentence in order to stay out
of an adult institution. It is an escape valve for the offender
who can and/or wants to be rehabilitated. If those offenders do
not comply with court orders for treatment, commit another offense,
do not pay restitution, or whatever, the adult sentence is imposed.
MS. KNUTH commented the Coalition for Juvenile Justice recently
published an annual report that examined the transformations
occurring in the juvenile system, and discusses the popularity of
the automatic waiver approach. She read the following excerpt from
that report:
"The consequences of this trend toward greater adult handling of
juvenile offenders have been varied. There is generally a greater
need for court and prosecutorial resources because of higher
demands, especially since the more punitive results may result in
fewer guilty pleas and more demands for jury trials. Juveniles
transferred to, and tried in adult court, usually serve a
significantly longer period of time in pretrial detention awaiting
a trial date and with more educational and other resource demands
on the facility. Although the results of studies are mixed,
juveniles tried in adult court may receive more probation and
shorter sentences than in juvenile court, especially for offenses
other than homicide, rape, and robbery. Juveniles tried as adults
also frequently have higher recidivism rates, offend earlier after
release, and commit more serious offenses."
Ms. Knuth noted the three measures of the effectiveness of any
criminal justice system are: the recidivism rate, how soon
reoffenses occur; and whether more serious offenses are committed.
She stated the automatic waiver approach is showing some flaws.
Consequently, some experts are now recommending dual sentences
because they are more tailored, keep the offender invested in their
own conduct, provide an escape valve for those who are salvageable,
and eliminate the need to repeat proceedings for those who do not
comply.
SENATOR MILLER moved SB 63 from committee with individual
recommendations. There being no objection, the motion carried.
SENATOR DONLEY commented the fact that adult sentencing criteria
will be used for some repeat offenders will deter juveniles from
reoffending.
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|