Legislature(2013 - 2014)BELTZ 105 (TSBldg)
02/04/2014 01:30 PM Senate LABOR & COMMERCE
| Audio | Topic |
|---|---|
| Start | |
| SB61 | |
| SB58 | |
| Adjourn |
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
| += | SB 61 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| += | SB 58 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | TELECONFERENCED |
SB 58-CANCEL INS. ON CERTAIN ABANDONED PROPERTY
1:51:46 PM
CHAIR DUNLEAVY reconvened the meeting and announced the
consideration of SB 58. "An Act allowing an insurer to cancel an
insurance policy if property becomes entirely abandoned and the
abandonment increases the hazard insured against." He noted that
the bill received one hearing at the end of last session.
1:52:09 PM
SENATOR DENNIS EGAN, sponsor of SB 58, read the following
sponsor statement into the record:
SB 58 clarifies that insurance can be cancelled when a
property owner abandons the property, thereby
increasing a hazard covered by the insurance.
AS 21.36.210 lists allowable reasons for cancelling
personal insurance, including a grossly negligent act
by the insured that increases a covered hazard and
physical changes in the insured property that result
in the property becoming uninsurable. As this statute
is currently written, it is not clear whether these
reasons would include abandonment of the property by
the insured.
Homeowners insurance is underwritten based on the
property generally being occupied. An abandoned home
greatly increases the risk of damage beyond what was
contemplated in the insurance contract, including
damage caused by vandalism, broken water pipes and
fire. Cancellation of insurance when the property is
abandoned is necessary to manage insurance costs for
all consumers.
SB 58 clarifies that insurance on property that has
been entirely abandoned can be cancelled in Alaska, as
it can in all other states. However, it is important
to note that SB 58 would establish the most
restrictive circumstances in the country. For
instance, thirty days advance written notice must be
given to the insured and any lender on record. In
addition, insurance cannot be cancelled where the
owner demonstrates that the property is being
reasonably maintained and monitored. SB 58 is
responsible legislation that helps manage claims
costs, the risk pool and the cost of insurance
coverage for Alaska homeowners.
1:54:19 PM
SENATOR OLSON asked how the abandonment provision affects a
property that is mortgaged.
SHELDON WINTERS, Lobbyist, State Farm Insurance, Juneau, Alaska,
explained that the insurance company would provide the required
30-day notice of cancelation to the owner. SB 58 provides an
added protection that requires the insurance company to send
notice of cancellation to any lender of record that it is aware
of.
SENATOR OLSON asked how many other states have similar
legislation.
MR. WINTERS offered his understanding that every state has a
cancellation statute. Some statutes are more complex than
others, but in no state other than Alaska has State Farm had any
concern about the ability to cancel a policy on entirely
abandoned property. The issue arose in Alaska when the Division
of Insurance said that under a strict interpretation the current
statute would not allow cancelation even if the property was
entirely abandoned. He highlighted that SB 58 builds protections
into the statute to make sure that it only applies to property
that is unquestionably abandoned.
1:59:31 PM
SENATOR MICCICHE posed a hypothetical scenario similar to what
happened in the late 1980s when a lot of rental properties were
vacant for long periods. He asked how the bill would affect him
as owner of that abandoned rental.
MR. WINTERS said his understanding is that this only applies to
personal insurance which means fewer than four units. If the
rental falls under personal insurance, abandonment is defined as
nobody living there as intended in the insurance contract.
Vacancy between rentals wouldn't constitute abandonment.
Abandonment is when the property is vacant, uncared for, and not
maintained. He said it's counterintuitive to think that an
insurance company would want to cancel the insurance on a piece
of property without a significant reason.
2:01:29 PM
CHAIR DUNLEAVY opened public testimony.
2:01:39 PM
RUBEN WILLIS, representing himself, State Farm Insurance,
Juneau, Alaska, related his experience as an insurance agent in
Alaska. He stated support for SB 58 as a means of risk
management. If risk changes substantially, it's appropriate that
the cost isn't passed on to people who are taking care of their
homes and properties. He described the process he would go
through to contact the owner if an insured property appeared
abandoned.
2:04:00 PM
SENATOR OLSON asked how long it would take before an insurance
company would consider a vacant property abandoned.
MR. WILLIS clarified that State Farm hasn't canceled anyone for
abandoned property yet because it hasn't been an option, but the
most likely scenario is that he would find out directly from the
insured.
SENATOR OLSON restated the question about timeframes.
MR. WILLIS deferred to Mr. Winters.
2:05:56 PM
MR. WINTERS said there was some discussion early on about
putting in a timeframe so people would have a guide, but no
other state does that because it's too restrictive. He cited the
example of an abandoned house in Fairbanks in the winter.
However, with realtors' assistance the language in the bill was
narrowed to cover only clearly abandoned property. Even after
the notice goes out, the owner or their representative can show
the agent that the property is being cared for and it's not
deemed abandoned. In addition to the safeguards in the bill,
oversight by the Division of Insurance provides another layer of
protection to property owners.
SENATOR OLSON asked how many of his clients are not on the road
system.
MR. WILLIS estimated less than 25.
SENATOR OLSON asked if an insurance company could cancel the
insurance if a homeowner went to Acapulco for most of the winter
and their vacant house froze up even though a friend was
overseeing the property.
MR. WINTERS said that property is not entirely abandoned.
Moreover, the bill does not allow an insurance company to cancel
a policy after a claim is made. The bill addresses a property
that no longer fits within the risk pool.
SENATOR MICCICHE asked how recreational cabins fit in this
category, assuming they're insured.
2:12:07 PM
MR. WINTERS said those too would be protected because the
insurance is defined by the policy. By definition, a
recreational cabin is likely to be vacant for extended periods
of time, but that doesn't mean abandoned. He added the caution
that an insured home has to be occupied or have somebody taking
care of it.
CHAIR DUNLEAVY kept public testimony open and held SB 58 in
committee.
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|---|---|
| SB0058A.pdf |
SL&C 2/4/2014 1:30:00 PM |
SB 58 |
| SB 58 Sponsor Statement.pdf |
SL&C 2/4/2014 1:30:00 PM |
SB 58 |
| SB 58 State Farm Hand-out.pdf |
SL&C 2/4/2014 1:30:00 PM |
SB 58 |
| SB 58 email supporting - Babcock 022013.PDF |
SL&C 2/4/2014 1:30:00 PM |
SB 58 |
| SB 58 lttr supporting - Winters 022113.pdf |
SL&C 2/4/2014 1:30:00 PM |
SB 58 |
| SB 58 NAMIC's written testimony 020114.pdf |
SL&C 2/4/2014 1:30:00 PM |
SB 58 |
| SB58_Support_Letter- Brine 040413.pdf |
SL&C 2/4/2014 1:30:00 PM |
SB 58 |
| SB058-DCCED-DOI-01-21-14.pdf |
SL&C 2/4/2014 1:30:00 PM |
SB 58 |
| SB61_bill_text.PDF |
SL&C 2/4/2014 1:30:00 PM |
SB 61 |
| SB61_sponsor_statement.PDF |
SL&C 2/4/2014 1:30:00 PM |
SB 61 |
| SB61_sectional_analysis.PDF |
SL&C 2/4/2014 1:30:00 PM |
SB 61 |
| SB61_Support_letters_CFAB.pdf |
SL&C 2/4/2014 1:30:00 PM |
SB 61 |
| SB61_Support_Letter_ATIA.pdf |
SL&C 2/4/2014 1:30:00 PM |
SB 61 |
| SB061-DCCED-DBS-01-21-14.pdf |
SL&C 2/4/2014 1:30:00 PM |
SB 61 |