Legislature(2025 - 2026)ADAMS 519
05/01/2025 01:30 PM House FINANCE
Note: the audio
and video
recordings are distinct records and are obtained from different sources. As such there may be key differences between the two. The audio recordings are captured by our records offices as the official record of the meeting and will have more accurate timestamps. Use the icons to switch between them.
Audio | Topic |
---|---|
Start | |
SB57 | |
HB27 | |
HB194 | |
Adjourn |
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+= | SB 57 | TELECONFERENCED | |
+= | HB 27 | TELECONFERENCED | |
+ | HB 194 | TELECONFERENCED | |
+ | TELECONFERENCED |
CS FOR SENATE BILL NO. 57(FIN) "An Act making appropriations, including capital appropriations and other appropriations; making reappropriations; making appropriations to capitalize funds; and providing for an effective date." 1:41:46 PM Co-Chair Foster MOVED to ADOPT the proposed committee substitute for CSSB 57(FIN), Work Draft 34-GS1460\U (Walsh, 4/30/25)(copy on file). Co-Chair Schrage OBJECTED for discussion. Co-Chair Schrage asked his staff to review the changes in the Committee Substitute (CS). ERIK GUNDERSON, STAFF, REPRESENTATIVE CALVIN SCHRAGE, reviewed the changes in the CS. He summarized that the CS increased deferred maintenance for kindergarten through grade twelve (K-12) schools, Judiciary, and the University of Alaska (UA). It also provided additional funding for the Alaska Travel Industry Association (AITA) while utilizing other funds and reappropriations. He noted that a few other changes were covered in the summary of changes document. He read from the Summary of Changes (copy on file): Page 3, lines 10-13: Department of Commerce, Community and Economic Development - increases the grant amount to Alaska Travel Industry Association from $2,500,000 to $5,000,000 from the general fund and specifies the grant is for "Tourism Marketing Activities in National and International Markets". Page 3, lines 17-18: Department of Education and Early Development - increases the appropriation from the general fund to Mt. Edgecumbe High School for Replacement of Dorm Windows from $1,365,000 to $2,730,000. Page 3, lines 19-21: Department of Education and Early Development - increases the appropriation to the Major Maintenance Grant Fund (AS 14.11.007) from $19,055,000 to $38,110,038, providing funding for the top 9 projects on the School Major Maintenance list. Page 5, lines 11-12: Office of the Governor - increases the appropriation to the Office of the Governor for Statewide Deferred Maintenance, Renovation, and Repair from $10,000,000 to $20,000,000 in designated funds from the Alaska Capital Income Fund. 1:45:22 PM Page 36, lines 24-25: University of Alaska - increases the appropriation from the general fund for Facilities Deferred Maintenance and Modernization from $5,000,000 to $10,000,000. Page 37, line 3: Judiciary - increases the appropriation from the general fund for Building Repairs from $750,000 to $1,500,000. Page 43, line 30 through page 44, line 3: Department of Commerce, Community, and Economic Development (DCCED) - appropriates from the general fund $600,000 to the Department of Commerce, Community, and Economic Development for organizational grants under AS 29.05.190 to the Xunaa Borough for Fiscal Years 26, 27, and 28. Page 44, lines 16 - 18: Department of Education and Early Development DEED) - inserts new subsection (b) as backfill language in the event that the balance of the major maintenance grant fund (AS 14.11.007) is less than $38,110,038, the shortfall amount would be appropriated from the general fund. Mr. Gunderson interjected that the last item was in relation to the Senate's recent CS for the operating budget which appropriated an estimated $30 million in FY 25 lapsing operating funds to capitalize DEED's Major Maintenance Grant Fund. 1:47:58 PM Co-Chair Schrage noted that Representative Galvin joined the meeting. Representative Stapp inquired about the $600,000 grant to the Hoonah (Xunna) Borough. He asked for details. Mr. Gunderson answered that the $600,000 was part of an organizational grant through DCCED. There was a forthcoming election in Hoonah regarding expanding the city to an organized borough. Funding was provided via state statute in the event a community transitions to an organized borough. Representative Hannan clarified that the "X" was pronounced as a "H". The funding was conditional on the outcome of the election in favor of the expansion. Representative Stapp asked if the $600,000 was supposed to be community assistance funding. Mr. Gunderson deferred the question to the Legislative Finance Division (LFD). MICHAEL PARTLOW, ANALYST, LEGISLATIVE FINANCE DIVISION (via teleconference), replied that the organizational grant was provided for via statute. He delineated that it was distributed in three payments over three years. The first payment was $200,000 within 30 days of certification of incorporation. The second payment of $200,000 was issued within 30 days of the start of the second fiscal year after incorporation. Finally, the third payment of $100,000 was issued within 30 days of the start of the third fiscal year. He concluded that the grant provided startup money for a new borough. Representative Stapp asked Mr. Partlow to repeat his answer. Mr. Partlow reiterated his answer specifying the distribution of funds. 1:52:20 PM Representative Stapp asked if the entire $600,000 had to be front loaded. Mr. Partlow replied that via statute the funding was all available upfront to the department, but not the community. Mr. Gunderson returned to the Summary of Changes: Page 45, line 19: Department of Transportation and Public Facilities (DOT) - increases the amount appropriated from reappropriations to the Department of Transportation and Public Facilities for federal- aid highway state match from $47,110,303 to $49,702,303. Page 45, lines 23-25: Department of Transportation and Public Facilities - reappropriates an estimated balance of $3,457,666 from sec. 13, ch. 29, SLA 2008, page 159, lines 20-22 Palmer Wasilla Highway Improvements Phase II, toward federal-aid highway match. Representative Johnson had some concerns and questions. She noted that the prior and following two items were reappropriations that were all decremented out of Matanuska-Susitna (Mat-Su) Borough ongoing highway projects. She thought that reappropriating funding in the middle of ongoing projects was unusual. She asked for comment. Co-Chair Schrage answered that it was a bit unusual, but he countered that so was the budget process in the current fiscal situation. He explained that the items were included in the CS for the committee to consider and scrutinize whether the progress made on the projects warranted further funding. He offered that it was a very difficult fiscal time for the state. He noted that the appropriations were made five years' prior, and all had significant unobligated balances. Representative Johnson thought there was a misunderstanding because the road projects were not completed and were in the middle of construction. She voiced that it was highly unusual to remove funding in the middle of a road project and believed that it was dangerous." She thought eliminating so much from Mat-Su projects was "interesting." She would continue to speak to the issue. Co-Chair Schrage replied that he took any project with a significant unobligated balance and included it in the CS for further consideration. He furthered that on the Palmer Wasilla Highway Improvements project the original appropriation occurred 17 years ago and it's taken until the current year to spend one-eighth of the funding. 1:57:24 PM Representative Johnson shared information regarding the Glenn Highway project, which was not a project currently in question. She recalled working on the project in the planning phases in 2005. She was intimately involved in the planning from 2010 through 2016 as mayor of Palmer. She related that right-of-way acquisition took a long time. She hoped the project would be finished in the coming summer. The project took 20 years, which was not slow or unusual. She pointed to the Fairview Loop project that involved a railroad crossing and right-of-way acquisitions. She would be looking closely at the reappropriations. She thought it was a terrible practice to start. Representative Allard asked if Andy Mills was available from the Department of Transportation and Public Facilities (DOT). She asked for clarification on the project. She shared Representative Johnson's concerns. Co-Chair Schrage answered in the negative and relayed that there was another representative available online. DOM PANNONE, DIRECTOR, PROGRAM MANAGEMENT AND ADMINISTRATION, DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION AND PUBLIC FACILITIES (via teleconference), asked which project was being referred to. Co-Chair Schrage answered that it was the Palmer Wasilla Highway Improvements Phase II project. Mr. Pannone replied that it was an "active" project. He expounded that the remaining balance of funds were for improvements that were within the scope of the project that were requested by the City of Wasilla via a resolution. The funds were encumbered, and the department intended to expend the funds in the coming summer. The department collaborated with the city on a planned safety project and was responding to the public's needs for the project. Representative Allard asked how the removal of the funds would impact the area. Mr. Pannone responded that the safety project entailed turning lanes and traffic patterns that posed a risk to the traveling public. The funds were going to be under contract and encumbered. He was not certain on the technical issues if the funds were reappropriated while encumbered. He ascertained that if the project was under contract, it would subject DOT to potential legal action and the project would be delayed or stall out due to lack of funding. Representative Allard asked whether there were safety risks or if lives were at stake with the liability and she wondered if the state could be held liable if a lawsuit occurred. 2:03:21 PM Mr. Pannone did not say the state would be liable. The project was a requested safety improvement for the identified portion of road and without the funds it would not happen. Representative Bynum noted there were three projects totaling almost $12 million and only one project was briefly addressed. He requested more information concerning the Palmer Wasilla Highway Improvements Phase II project, the $8.149,630 Fairview Loop Road Reconstruction project and the Fairview Loop Road pedestrian pathway for $201,221. He shared that in Ketchikan, there was a Tongass Highway repaving project that was in the works for a decade and the project was done in phases due to difficulties in getting the right of way and other preliminary work done. He asked about the actual impacts" on all three projects by pulling the funds before the committee decided on the items. 2:06:28 PM Mr. Pannone answered that regarding the Palmer Wasilla Highway project the department intended to be under construction in the coming summer. He reiterated that the reappropriation would prevent the work from happening. He offered to speak to the Fairview Loop projects. Co-Chair Schrage interjected and inquired if pulling the funds killed or delayed the project. Mr. Pannone replied that the department would not be able to proceed . Representative Bynum wondered about the other projects. Co-Chair Schrage asked if they were currently under contract for construction during the coming summer. Mr. Pannone responded that the funds intended to be under contract within a "couple of months" but were not currently under contract. Representative Hannan asked what the original appropriation in 2008 was. She noted that it was as a phase two project and asked about other prior phases. Mr. Pannone replied that he did not have all of the specific projects or scopes of work on hand. He would follow up to answer the question. Representative Hannan asked if it was correct to conclude that some of the 2008 funding had been spent and the $3,457,666 was the amount remaining. Mr. Pannone replied that over $500,000 had been expended from the original $4 million appropriation. The department could also combine funding with other projects or have "multiple discreet scopes of work under an appropriation such as this." 2:10:05 PM Representative Tomaszewski shared that he had heard from a few contractors concerning the lack of work for the coming summer. He thought the project looked to be shovel ready and removal of the funding would stop the project for the summer. He worried about contractors in the state. He asked if it would kill the projects and lessen the pool of contracts. Mr. Pannone answered that he would agree with the statement that pulling the funding could reduce the number of projects DOT was trying to put on the street in the coming summer. Representative Bynum asked about the communities' expectation of the project. He also wondered if it had an impact on federal match. Mr. Pannone replied that the City of Wasilla assembly had conveyed the desire for DOT to complete the project. He believed the assembly understood the department was moving forward on the projects. He added that if the reappropriation was substituting "hard match" funding, DOT would continue to request the same amount of funding. 2:13:55 PM Representative Galvin asked for clarification if Mr. Pannone stated there was a federal match for the funds. Mr. Pannone responded that he was speaking to any reappropriations being used to provide matching funds for the current year's federal revenue and if the reappropriations were not made DOT would continue to request the original amount of match included in the governor's budget. Co-Chair Schrage would work to provide further clarity. Representative Allard stated that the Mat-Su was the fastest growing area in the state and pulling the project would be detrimental. Mr. Gunderson continued reviewing the changes in the CS: Page 45, lines 26-28: Department of Transportation and Public Facilities - reappropriates an estimated balance of $201,221 from sec. 7, ch.43, SLA 2010, page 36, lines 29-31, Fairview Loop Road pedestrian pathway, toward federal-aid highway match. Page 46, lines 1-3: Department of Transportation and Public Facilities - reappropriates an estimated balance of $8,149,630 from sec. 1, ch.17, SLA 2012, page 133, lines Fairview Loop Road reconstruction, toward federal-aid highway match. 2:16:47 PM Representative Johnson informed the committee that the road had been an ongoing issue for quite some time. She explained that there was an offramp to the Parks Highway that provided a path to Knik Goose Bay Road. Many commuters returning from Anchorage took the exit to bypass Wasilla and arrive at Knik Goose Bay Road, which was a rapidly growing neighborhood. The current road was an old wagon farm road that was highly trafficked. She elucidated that for old roads that had been in place there were a number of properties that had to be purchased for the right-of-way acquisition. She shared that the project was in the acquisition process. She relayed more information regarding acquisitions and utility relocations over five years regarding the Glenn Highway project. She emphasized that it took a lot of negotiations to get things in place before construction could be completed. The road in question had many houses and properties along it and was far from completion. Representative Allard had never seen reappropriating funding from ongoing projects. She did not support taking money from one project for another. She stressed that it could cost lives and was "dangerous. Representative Johnson drew attention to the second project; the pedestrian pathway. She related that the two projects were interrelated and was under the same appropriation. 2:21:17 PM Mr. Gunderson continued with the Summary of Changes: Page 46, lines 6-9: Department of Transportation and Public Facilities - reappropriates an estimated balance of $766, from sec. 1, ch.18, SLA 2014, page 63, line 4 and allocated on page 63, lines 12-13, as amended by secs. 14(d), 21(g), and 21(h), ch.1, TSSLA 2017, Knik Arm bridge project development, toward federal-aid highway match. Representative Johnson relayed that initially there was a much larger appropriation, and the funding was reappropriated to the Kivalina School. She hoped they would follow the rule to keep money in the same district. She understood the federal funding for the project was $40,000,000. Co-Chair Schrage commented that sometimes changes happened because they were warranted. Representative Stapp thought it probably cost more than $766. to reappropriate the $766. He thought the administrative cost alone exceeded the amount. Co-Chair Schrage did not have any experts available to perform the calculation. 2:23:58 PM Mr. Gunderson continued with the summary of changes: Page 46, line 15-17: Department of Commerce, Community, and Economic Development - Alaska Energy Authority - reappropriates an estimated balance of $782,125 from sec.14, ch.11, SLA 2022, page 117, lines 19-20, electrical vehicle infrastructure plan, toward federal-aid highway match. The Department of Commerce, Community, and Economic Development - removes reappropriation sec. 14, ch.11, SLA 2022 page 86, line 31, City of Nome, deep draft port. Representative Bynum cited the electric vehicle program. He noted that the program was suspended by the federal government and the program could not be revived. He asked if he was correct. Co-Chair Schrage answered in the affirmative. Representative Bynum believed the suspension was unfortunate. Representative Hannan related that the item was not in the summary of changes, but her colleague had spoken to the idea that reappropriations should remain within the same district. She pointed out that her district likely had the biggest loss on page 46, at a total of $36 million being reappropriated; none to her district. She did not believe that certain projects or regions were being picked on and believed that her district was the "biggest loser" Representative Johnson wanted to speak to the Juneau Access Road that had much local opposition. She pointed out the there currently was no road and she did not view it as a safety issue. Representative Hannan contended that she was not asserting it was a safety issue but was addressing the tradition of reappropriations remaining in the district. 2:26:52 PM Representative Tomaszewski spoke to the road to Juneau. He would like to see more citizens of Alaska get the opportunity to come to Juneau via a road. Co-Chair Schrage noted there was a marine highway that was available for passenger and vehicle transport to the capitol. Mr. Gunderson continued with the Summary of Changes: Page 51, lines 3-7: Office of the Governor - updates reappropriation language for lapsing operating funds from the Office of the Governor to include expenses related to the commissioning of the USS Ted Stevens, US Navy Ship, and associated support activities in the state for fiscal years 2026 and 2027, not to exceed $100,000. Page 51, lines 23-28: Office of the Governor - updates reappropriation language for lapsing operating funds from the Office of the Governor to include capital costs and material purchases related to facilities repairs, information technology improvements and upgrades, food security, the 2026 Alaska Sustainable Energy Conference, government efficiencies, and resource development analyses, studies, and process reviews. 2:28:51 PM Representative Stapp thought change on page 51, lines 3 through 7 was an interesting reappropriation. He recounted that the state did not commission ships. He believed that reappropriating money from the governor's office for the items listed in the prior two items was unusual and wanted further clarification. 2:29:43 PM AT EASE 2:30:52 PM RECONVENED Co-Chair Schrage explained that the Navy destroyer, named after the late Senator Ted Stevens, would journey to Juneau and also visit Kodiak, Anchorage, and Ketchikan. He noted that there were funds reappropriated to provide some auxiliary support for the effort. Representative Stapp wondered what they were spending $100,000 on. Co-Chair Schrage would follow up on the specific costs. He was aware that the state wanted an active role in the effort. Representative Allard also would like further details. She found it peculiar. Representative Johnson thought that typically the military took great pride in showing off its equipment. She read the language from the prior version of the bill [CS SB 57 (FIN)] on page 49, lines 13 through 16: The unexpended and unobligated general fund balances of the following appropriations are reappropriated to the Office of the Governor for capital costs related to facility repair and maintenance, information technology infrastructure, elections equipment, and material purchases Representative Johnson believed that the reappropriations were removing the funding out of maintaining infrastructure. She was concerned that funding was eliminated for the purchase of elections equipment and believed that infrastructure should be maintained for reasons like a visiting ship. 2:34:23 PM Mr. Gunderson maintained that there was no requirement that $100,000 was spent by the Office of the Governor. The item merely granted authority to use up to that amount of lapsing funds as it saw fit. He read the final items from the Summary of Changes: Page 52, lines 22-25 - conforming changes. Page 52, lines 29-30: Adds contingency language that the $600,000 appropriation to the Xunaa Borough is contingent on the incorporation of the Xunaa Borough on or before December 31, 2025. Mr. Gunderson relayed high level changes to the CS. He indicated that there was a projected $730,000 reduction in Undesignated General Funds(UGF), a $40,000,000 increase in Designated General Funds (DGF), and a roughly $2,500,000 forecasted increase in other state funds. 2:35:45 PM Representative Johnson asked about the next step in the budget process. Co-Chair Schrage replied that there would be an amendment deadline set for the following week. Co-Chair Schrage WITHDREW the objection. Representative Johnson OBJECTED. Representative Johnson reiterated her concern regarding the reappropriations from the Mat-Su appropriations. She believed that it placed the projects in "jeopardy, increased the projects' costs and was a "disservice" to the citizens of Alaska who relied on the safety upgrades. 2:37:49 PM Representative Bynum supported Representative Johnson's perspective due to his understanding of the effects of delaying a project in mid-course. A roll call vote was taken on the motion. IN FAVOR: Galvin, Jimmie, Hannah, Schrage, Foster, Josephson OPPOSED: Johnson, Bynum, Tomaszewski, Allard, Stapp The MOTION PASSED (6/5). There being NO further OBJECTION, work draft 34-GS1460\U (Walsh, 4/30/25) was ADOPTED. Co-Chair Schrage set an amendment deadline for Monday, May 5 at 12:00 p.m. Representative Allard remarked on the amendment deadline. She asked to move the deadline to Tuesday. Co-Chair Schrage replied that he would not change the amendment deadline. CSSB 57(FIN) was HEARD and HELD in committee for further consideration. 2:40:03 PM AT EASE 2:40:38 PM RECONVENED