Legislature(1997 - 1998)
01/28/1997 01:35 PM Senate TRA
| Audio | Topic |
|---|
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
SB 56 BUSINESS SIGNS/OUTDOOR ADVERTISING
Number 001
CHAIRMAN WARD called the Senate Transportation Committee meeting to
order at 1:35 p.m. and introduced SB 56 as the first order of
business before the committee.
JANEY WEININGER , Staff to Senator Green, explained that SB 56 would
amend Alaska Statute Title 19, allowing certain restricted
exceptions to current outdoor advertising so as to better serve the
traveling public and provide increased opportunity for Alaskans and
their businesses. Businesses off the main road would be allowed,
under SB 56, to use standardized signs measuring 18"x90" which
contained the business' name, directional arrows and symbols. The
program in SB 56 is modeled after an experimental directional
signage program that DOT/PF has been using since 1981. Although
the experimental program has been running without the legal
authority to do so, the program does conform with the Federal
Highway Administration (FHWA) standards as well as the Manual of
Uniform Traffic Devices. The legislation utilizes user-friendly
signage while maintaining scenic areas in the state. Ms. Weininger
informed the committee that SB 56 is supported by the Alaska
Campground Owners Association and the Alaska Visitor's Association
as well as many other tourist oriented businesses. Ms. Weininger
noted that SB 56 was introduced in the 19th Legislature as SB 181.
SB 181 passed the House and Senate overwhelmingly.
Number 064
BOYD BROWNFIELD , Deputy Commissioner of the Department of
Transportation & Public Facilities, informed the committee that the
Administration opposed SB 56 in its current form. The
Administration opposes a change in the statute that would
significantly perpetuate an increase of signage effecting the
scenic beauty of the Alaska highways. The Administration opposed
establishing a category of signs over which the state does not have
jurisdiction or control, specifically those on private lands.
Establishing a sign category outside of the state's right-of-way
would be difficult to enforce and could create legal and
administrative burdens for the state.
Mr. Brownfield said that the Administration opposed the reduction
of the penalty for an offense relating to an outdoor advertising
sign from a misdemeanor to a simple violation. A simple violation
does not have an additive affect as would a misdemeanor. Due to
limited staff, stretches of highway may lie unchecked for sign
compliance for three years. Mr. Brownfield commented that the
reduction of the penalty seemed to mean that Alaska's scenic
highways are not of importance. Furthermore, the reduction of the
penalty could allow a sign owner to violate a regulation and view
the fine every three or four years as a business expense.
Number 126
Mr. Brownfield pointed out that SB 56 states that directional signs
should be established "in a manner consistent with standards
established by the Federal Highway Administration and the Manual of
Uniform Traffic Control Devices." The FHWA's standards allow signs
of a maximum size of 650 square feet, with a maximum of 20'x50'.
Although, SB 56 does limit the size this merely brings Alaska one
step closer to billboards under the FHWA's standards. In
conclusion, Mr. Brownfield informed the committee that the Governor
had directed DOT to establish a committee consisting of members
from DOT, DCED, and the tourism industry in order to review signage
issues without compromising Alaska's scenery.
SAM KITO III , Special Assistant in DOT/PF, passed out the draft
task force report which outlines several options Alaska has with
regards to establishing signage for businesses along the highway
system. As a result of this information, DOT has created a group
to review the options for a signage policy as well as creating
regulations implementing the policy. The regulations should be
completed around the end of June 1997, but this could change as the
process evolves.
SENATOR LINCOLN inquired as to how individuals in rural Alaska who
own businesses off the highway would be addressed under this
legislation. BOYD BROWNFIELD informed the committee that the
possibility of placing signage before a recreational area was being
reviewed.
Number 202
SAM KITO III explained that the signage program being reviewed in
the task force would offer more than just the Tourist Oriented
Directional Signs (TODS) type. TODS notifies the traveling public
of amenities along the highway. The task force is reviewing a
federal program called LOGO signs as well as the option of placing
kiosks outside a community area. Currently, TODS signs are not
allowed in areas with a population greater than 5,000. With
regards to the rural areas, a service provider can place signs on
their own property or apply for a TODS sign. Mr. Kito acknowledged
that the TODS signs are fairly restrictive. The LOGO signs would
allow signs with icons describing a service and the distance to
that service. The regulations encompassing the TODS signs, the
LOGO program and the kiosks should address most of concerns of
those located on the rural road system.
BOYD BROWNFIELD noted that he and his staff had worked with Senator
Green last year on this issue in order to develop a mutually
acceptable regulation. That did not come to fruition, but did
impel a more in depth review of what can and cannot be done.
Number 249
SENATOR GREEN did not believe that the desire was to imprison a
person who violates sign regulations. The violation in the bill
allows DOT the same authority with violators of sign regulations.
With regards to the task force, many of the constituents who
attended left discouraged due to the lack of knowledge on the part
of the task force. Senator Green emphasized that the size was
specified in the title of the bill in order to avoid the
possibility of billboards. This bill is an extension of the
present practices that are not in code. This should be in the
interest of DOT.
BOYD BROWNFIELD pointed out the following two issues of
disagreement: placing signs on private property; changing the
violation from a misdemeanor to a simple violation. It is not
mandatory that a misdemeanor have a jail sentence. However, if a
person violates statute repeatedly harsher consequences would get
their attention. The problem is that the department does not have
the resources to police the offenders. When policing does occur,
once every third year or so, under SB 56 the violator could view
the fine as a business expense. The violator could absorb the fine
and build another sign, wait until the next policing occurs in a
few years.
SENATOR GREEN moved to report SB 56 out of committee with
individual recommendations and attached fiscal notes. Without
objection, it was so ordered.
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|