Legislature(2013 - 2014)BELTZ 105 (TSBldg)
03/21/2013 01:30 PM Senate LABOR & COMMERCE
| Audio | Topic |
|---|---|
| Start | |
| HB26 | |
| SB65 | |
| SB55 | |
| SB52 | |
| Adjourn |
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
| *+ | SB 65 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| += | HB 26 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| += | SB 55 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| += | SB 52 | TELECONFERENCED | |
SB 55-INSURER'S USE OF CREDIT SCORES
2:01:27 PM
CHAIR DUNLEAVY announced the consideration of SB 55. "An Act
relating to actions by insurers based on credit history or
insurance score." He noted that this was the second hearing.
2:01:46 PM
At ease
2:02:35 PM
CHAIR DUNLEAVY reconvened the meeting and opened public
testimony.
2:02:49 PM
MICHAEL DUNSMORE, representing himself, Anchorage, AK, testified
in opposition to SB 55. He said that the basic concept of
allowing credit scores to be used to determine insurance rates
is flawed. He heard testimony that an insurance company could
impose a higher rate if a person has a poor credit score and
lower the rate if a person has a good credit score. However, he
has a hard time believing that an insurance company would
voluntarily give a lower rate than was offered initially,
because that is not a good business model.
He offered his belief that it would be a poor decision to allow
insurance agencies to base their billings on a credit score that
is inherently not transparent and that the legislature can't
review. This would not benefit the people of Alaska, but it
would give insurance companies another arbitrary reason to deny
coverage or increase rates. In particular, the concept of this
bill has the potential to hurt low-income people. They are more
likely to have other concerns than paying attention to their
credit scores and are more likely to have difficulty paying
their bills. This bill would make it possible for insurance to
penalize them more and provide higher costs for their insurance
coverage. He asked the committee not to pass SB 55.
2:07:43 PM
DANIEL LYNCH, representing himself, Soldotna, AK, said he was
testifying in support of common sense and against SB 55. He said
credit ratings should have zero influence on insurance rates.
Insurance worthiness would be better judged by high school and
college grades, height, weight, or physical health, not credit
scores from an independent corporate business that is known to
have up to 40 percent inaccurate information.
He pointed out that people are constitutionally entitled to a
right of privacy. Therefore, it is a violation of a person's
privacy for a private credit rating organization to use the
person's credit information if the person doesn't voluntarily
provide it. A person's driving record, the value of their car,
home construction methods, renter's belongings and distances
from fire suppression or flood plains is information that can be
obtained without privacy violations. Noting that some
legislators have stated that accessing a person's credit score
is already allowed when the initial policy is written, he said
two wrongs don't make a right and the initial policy procedure
should be voided.
MR. LYNCH said he has a commercial driver's license and has
driven in Alaska for 20 years with no DUIs, moose collisions,
accidents, or tickets, yet his premiums have increased with each
bill. He imagined that his credit score is nonexistent or skewed
since he has no loans, credit cards, payment plans, or
subscriptions to credit agencies. He said that most young people
are just beginning to establish credit, but one layoff slip,
late payment, or health problem increases their insurance rates
and that isn't right. He urged the committee to get back to the
basics and protect the consumer, not the corporations.
2:11:49 PM
GEORGE PIERCE, representing himself, Kasilof, AK, testified in
opposition to SB 55, because an insurance company accessing his
credit score is an invasion of his privacy.
2:12:57 PM
KENTON BRINE, Northwest Regional Manager and Assistant Vice
President, Property Casualty Insurers Association of America
(PCI), Olympia, WA, said PCI is a national trade association of
property casualty insurance companies. Many of these companies
write policies in Alaska and they represent about 35 percent of
the home and auto insurance in this marketplace. He offered to
answer questions.
SENATOR MICCICHE asked if it was his position that the bill
would not raise people's insurance rates.
MR. BRINE relayed that federal antitrust laws forbid him from
predicting rates in a marketplace, but PCI has testified
previously that credit-based insurance scores benefit consumers.
Credit is an accurate predictor and studies show it either
improves the insured's risk or does no harm. He referenced the
testimony today and clarified that credit scoring is already
allowed for insurance companies. The bill simply allows the
practice to continue when a policy renews. He highlighted that
studies show that a significant number of Alaska policyholders
are receiving rate increases because insurance companies have to
strip out the credit at renewal and rerate the policyholder
after two years. That is causing rates to go up in Alaska today,
but that would end if insurers were allowed to use a
policyholder's credit at renewal.
SENATOR MICCICHE said he understands some of the opposition. He
related an experience two constituents had when they renewed
their vehicle insurance policy and observed that the rate
increase appeared to be somewhat arbitrary. He asked what would
keep some other, potentially arbitrary, factor from being used
to set insurance rates in the future.
MR. BRINE disagreed with the characterization that rates are set
arbitrarily because the models are sophisticated and preapproved
by the insurance department. He said he couldn't speculate about
what occurred with the policyholders Senator Micciche mentioned,
but some rating factors must have been unfavorable or factors
that were not related specifically to those people might have
caused rates to increase within a tier. He reiterated that one
of the benefits of credit scoring is that it is a highly
accurate predictor of loss, although it may not make intrinsic
sense to some people. He said that other rating factors that
might interfere with a person's ability to get lower cost
insurance fall to a lower level of rating criteria and credit
tends to replace it in those circumstances. He stated his belief
that it would be an overall benefit to consumers in Alaska to
pass this legislation. It would make Alaska more competitive and
attract more insurance companies to the state.
2:20:17 PM
SENATOR MICCICHE said his concern is for those consumers that
find the process somewhat of a mystery and don't realize that
there is a correlation between their credit scores and ranking.
CHAIR DUNLEAVY asked Mr. Kolb if the administration had a
position on the bill.
MR. KOLB offered his belief that the bill would be beneficial to
consumers in Alaska and offer opportunities for insurance
companies to be more competitive in their pricing, because
credit scores or the use of an insurance score does have a
statistical correlation to future risk.
CHAIR DUNLEAVY closed public testimony and solicited a motion.
2:22:01 PM
SENATOR MICCICHE moved to report SB 55, 28-LS0404\N, from
committee with individual recommendations and attached zero
fiscal note(s).
2:22:30 PM
SENATOR ELLIS stated that a number of his constituents have had
problems with credit ratings, credit scores, and inaccurate
information, so he wasn't a big supporter of the bill. However,
he would not object to moving the bill from committee.
CHAIR DUNLEAVY found no further comments or objection and
announced that SB 55 moved from the Senate Labor and Commerce
Standing Committee.
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|---|---|
| SB52_Amendments_3-18-13.pdf |
SL&C 3/21/2013 1:30:00 PM |
SB 52 |
| CS_SB52_VersionN.pdf |
SL&C 3/21/2013 1:30:00 PM |
SB 52 |
| SB52_CS_Sectional_Analysis_VersionN.pdf |
SL&C 3/21/2013 1:30:00 PM |
SB 52 |
| SB52_Mar 19 Memo re Amendments.pdf |
SL&C 3/21/2013 1:30:00 PM |
SB 52 |
| SB52_markup Version N.pdf |
SL&C 3/21/2013 1:30:00 PM |
SB 52 |
| SB65_Bill_VersionU.pdf |
SL&C 3/21/2013 1:30:00 PM |
SB 65 |
| SB 65 Sectional Analysis AMENDED.docx |
SL&C 3/21/2013 1:30:00 PM |
SB 65 |
| SB65_Sponsor_Statement.pdf |
SL&C 3/21/2013 1:30:00 PM |
SB 65 |
| SB65_Key_Terms_for_Trust_Bill.pdf |
SL&C 3/21/2013 1:30:00 PM |
SB 65 |
| SB65_FiscalNore_DOL_CIV.pdf |
SL&C 3/21/2013 1:30:00 PM |
SB 65 |
| SB65_FiscalNote-DCCED-DOI-03-15-13.pdf |
SL&C 3/21/2013 1:30:00 PM |
SB 65 |
| SB65_FiscalNote-DOA-DRB-3-15-13.pdf |
SL&C 3/21/2013 1:30:00 PM |
SB 65 |
| SB65_FiscalNote-DOR-TRS-03-16-13.pdf |
SL&C 3/21/2013 1:30:00 PM |
SB 65 |
| SB65_FiscalNote-LAW-CIV-03-19-13.pdf |
SL&C 3/21/2013 1:30:00 PM |
SB 65 |
| SB65_ABA Letter of Support for.pdf |
SL&C 3/21/2013 1:30:00 PM |
SB 65 |
| SB 65 Support Letter.pdf |
SL&C 3/21/2013 1:30:00 PM |
SB 65 |
| HB026 text.pdf |
SL&C 3/21/2013 1:30:00 PM |
HB 26 |
| HB 26 Sponsor Statement.pdf |
SL&C 3/21/2013 1:30:00 PM |
HB 26 |
| HB 26 Full Audit CPA Board.pdf |
SL&C 3/21/2013 1:30:00 PM |
HB 26 |
| HB 26 Summery Audit of CPA Board.pdf |
SL&C 3/21/2013 1:30:00 PM |
HB 26 |
| HB026-DCCED Fiscal note.pdf |
SL&C 3/21/2013 1:30:00 PM |
HB 26 |
| SB65_Support_AK Trust Laws from Joe Beedle.PDF |
SL&C 3/21/2013 1:30:00 PM |
SB 65 |
| SB65_support_AKUSA.pdf |
SL&C 3/21/2013 1:30:00 PM |
SB 65 |
| SB052_Fiscal Note_DCCED-DOI-03-19-13.pdf |
SL&C 3/21/2013 1:30:00 PM |
SB 52 |